doi: 10.56294/mw2024473

REVIEW

Virtual higher education in Bolivia: Towards a comprehensive organizational, technological, and pedagogical model

Educación superior virtual en Bolivia: Hacia un modelo organizativo, tecnológico y pedagógico integral

Richard Jorge Torrez Juaniquina¹ *, Piter Henry Escobar Callejas¹  *, Edgar Olivares Alvares¹  *, Pablo José Guerrero¹  *, Ramiro José Iglesias Pérez²  *

¹ Universidad Pública de El Alto, La Paz. Bolivia.

² Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba. Bolivia.

Cite as: Torrez Juaniquina RJ, Escobar Callejas PH, Olivares Alvares E, Guerrero PJ, Iglesias Pérez RJ. Virtual higher education in Bolivia: Towards a comprehensive organizational, technological, and pedagogical model. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education. 2024; 3:473. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024473

Submitted: 27-09-2023            Revised: 17-05-2024                   Accepted: 22-08-2024                 Published: 23-08-2024

Editor: PhD. Prof. Estela Morales Peralta

Corresponding author: Richard Jorge Torrez Juaniquina *

ABSTRACT

Introduction: virtual education has taken on a central role in higher education, allowing to overcome geographical barriers and improve access to knowledge. In Bolivia, the transition to this modality faces challenges related to technological infrastructure, teacher training, and institutional regulation.

Objective: the purpose of this research is to propose a comprehensive model for virtual higher education in Bolivia, ensuring an efficient implementation that optimizes teaching and learning processes.

Method: the study employs a qualitative approach based on document analysis and systematic literature review. The PRISMA method is used to select relevant research in recognized databases such as Scopus, SciELO, and Web of Science. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to ensure the relevance of the analyzed studies.

Results: the study findings indicate that virtual education promotes access and flexibility in learning, but its success depends on factors such as teacher training, technological infrastructure, and the quality of the organizational models adopted. Hybrid and fully online approaches were identified, highlighting the importance of interaction among teachers, students, and administrators. Technological tools such as LMS platforms, video conferencing, gamification, and multimedia resources were analyzed, enhancing the learning experience.

Conclusion: virtual education in Bolivia has the potential to transform higher education, but its consolidation requires clear policies, investment in technology, and continuous teacher training. A comprehensive model should include quality standards, innovative learning strategies, and effective regulation to ensure accessibility and equity in virtual education.

Keywords: Virtual Education; Higher Education; Educational Technology; Organizational Model.

RESUMEN

Introducción: la educación virtual ha adquirido un papel central en la enseñanza superior, permitiendo superar barreras geográficas y mejorar el acceso al conocimiento. En Bolivia, la transición hacia esta modalidad enfrenta desafíos relacionados con la infraestructura tecnológica, la formación docente y la regulación institucional.

Objetivo: el propósito de esta investigación es proponer un modelo integral para la educación superior virtual en Bolivia, garantizando una implementación eficiente que optimice los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje.

Método: el estudio emplea un enfoque cualitativo basado en análisis documental y revisión sistemática de literatura. Se utiliza el método PRISMA para seleccionar investigaciones relevantes en bases de datos reconocidas como Scopus, SciELO y Web of Science. Se establecieron criterios de inclusión y exclusión para garantizar la pertinencia de los estudios analizados.

Resultados: los hallazgos del estudio indican que la educación virtual favorece el acceso y la flexibilidad en el aprendizaje, pero su éxito depende de factores como la formación docente, la infraestructura tecnológica y la calidad de los modelos organizativos adoptados. Se identificaron enfoques híbridos y completamente en línea, destacando la importancia de la interacción entre docentes, estudiantes y administradores. Asimismo, se analizaron herramientas tecnológicas como plataformas LMS, videoconferencias, gamificación y recursos multimedia, que potencian la experiencia de aprendizaje.

Conclusión: la educación virtual en Bolivia tiene el potencial de transformar la enseñanza superior, pero su consolidación requiere de políticas claras, inversión en tecnología y capacitación docente continua. Un modelo integral debe incluir estándares de calidad, estrategias de aprendizaje innovadoras y una regulación efectiva que garantice la accesibilidad y equidad en la educación virtual.

Palabras clave: Educación Virtual; Enseñanza Superior; Tecnología Educativa; Modelo Organizativo.

INTRODUCTION

The increasing digitization of education has significantly transformed teaching and learning methods, making the virtual modality a central and indispensable part of today’s higher education.⁽¹⁾ In this dynamic and constantly evolving context, the present study aims to design a comprehensive and adapted model that facilitates the effective implementation of the virtual modality in higher education institutions in Bolivia. This proposal arises from the pressing need to adjust these educational models to the Bolivian reality, where digital inclusion and quality training are essential for students’ academic and professional development. This is especially relevant in an increasingly competitive and demanding global environment, where students must be prepared to face continuous challenges and take advantage of virtual education opportunities.⁽²⁾

Higher education in Bolivia is in a significant transition phase, facing diverse and complex challenges that range from inequities of access to the quality of the education provided. Despite efforts to expand access to university education throughout the country, there is still marked inequality between urban and rural areas and within metropolitan areas, where some populations have very few opportunities for access. Educational institutions have to constantly adapt to the new demands of the labor market and the technological changes that directly impact the educational process.⁽³⁾ The evolution towards virtual teaching modalities presents both a favorable opportunity and a considerable challenge, given that this requires adequate technological infrastructures and trained teaching staff that can effectively integrate digital tools into their pedagogical practices. Therefore, continuous training of teaching professionals is crucial to ensure that the best use of the new technologies is made.

In this sense, the evolution of higher education in Bolivia has been marked by a series of transformations that have allowed for the gradual incorporation of virtual modalities. Higher education has sought to adapt to the demands of a constantly changing world, prioritizing inclusion and accessibility. Since the first experiences in distance learning, there has been an increase in student enrollment thanks to the implementation of virtual platforms that offer online courses and academic programs. This phenomenon responds to the need for flexibility in learning and the demands of the labor market, which nowadays requires digital skills. The virtual modality is presented as an effective response to geographical and infrastructure limitations, allowing students to access quality education from anywhere in the country.⁽⁴⁾

Likewise, the models for implementing the virtual modality in higher education institutions have varied widely, adapting to the specific needs of each context. Some approaches range from the hybrid model, which combines face-to-face and virtual teaching, to completely online modalities that promote autonomous learning.⁽⁵⁾ These models must consider key aspects such as teacher training, student interaction, and technological accessibility. In addition, successfully implementing these modalities requires solid institutional support, including continuous training for academic staff and the creation of virtual spaces for collaboration. In this way, it is possible to achieve a comprehensive educational experience that fosters knowledge and the development of critical skills in a virtual environment.

For this reason, educational technologies and virtual platforms are essential tools for implementing the virtual modality in higher education. The diversity of platforms, such as Moodle, Blackboard, and Google Classroom, allows institutions to select those that best suit their needs. These platforms facilitate the administration of courses and content and encourage interaction and collaborative work between teachers and students. Integrating tools such as discussion forums, videoconferencing, and multimedia resources enhances learning, allowing for more dynamic and participatory experiences. However, the effectiveness of these technologies depends on an adequate infrastructure and constant training of users, which means that institutions must invest in technological improvement and training teachers and students to ensure optimal use of available resources.⁽⁶⁾

Given the above, this study aims to propose a comprehensive model for implementing virtual higher education institutions in Bolivia, covering organizational, pedagogical, and technological aspects. The growing adoption of the virtual modality in Bolivian higher education demands a structured and coherent response that guarantees adequate integration. As the demand for distance education continues to increase, it is imperative to develop a model that not only considers the technological infrastructure but also responds to the country’s cultural and social context.

This study seeks to contribute to the professionalization of virtual education, ensuring that educational institutions have the appropriate infrastructure and methodologies adapted to current needs. This work’s relevance lies in its potential to raise the quality of education, expand access to higher education for a larger number of students, and prepare graduates for a constantly changing digital work environment.

METHOD

This study adopts a qualitative approach based on documentary and exploratory analysis. Qualitative analysis allows for in-depth interpretation and understanding of the information gathered in academic texts, identifying trends, patterns, and gaps in the existing literature. Likewise, the exploratory nature of the research facilitates the identification of new approaches and perspectives on virtual higher education, organizational models in e-learning, and educational policies in Bolivia.

The combination of these methods provides a holistic view of the subject of study, allowing not only the description of the current state of knowledge in the field but also the generation of a theoretical basis that can serve as a starting point for future research or proposals for improvement in the field of education.

To guarantee rigor and transparency in information collection, the research follows the PRISMA method, which is widely used in systematic literature reviews. This method allows for a structured organization of the selection process of scientific articles, ensuring that the information used is relevant, up-to-date, and of high quality.

The systematic review was done in academic databases of great prestige and recognition, such as Scopus, SciELO, and Web of Science. The choice of these databases responds to the need to access research published in indexed journals that meet editorial quality and peer review criteria.

The PRISMA method is developed in four phases:

1. Identification: At this stage, an exhaustive search of scientific articles was carried out in the selected databases, using keywords and Boolean operators to optimize the results.

2. Selection: Duplicate studies and those that did not meet the criteria of relevance for the research were eliminated.

3. Eligibility: A detailed reading of the abstracts and, subsequently, of the full texts was carried out, ensuring that the articles met the inclusion criteria.

4. Inclusion: Finally, the studies that provided key information for the analysis were selected and were categorized and evaluated.

This methodology allows us to filter and select studies that contribute significantly to the development of knowledge about virtual higher education in Bolivia, guaranteeing that the documentary analysis is based on quality academic evidence.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To ensure the relevance and quality of the studies analyzed, inclusion and exclusion criteria were established in order to delimit the scope of the systematic review.

Inclusion criteria:

• Academic research that addresses the topic of virtual higher education, with a focus on its characteristics, benefits and challenges.

• Studies that analyze organizational models in e-learning environments, considering aspects such as teaching methodologies, institutional management and technologies used.

• Articles that examine educational policies in Bolivia related to distance higher education, their implementation, regulations and challenges.

• Publications indexed in scientific journals and available in recognized databases, with a publication period not exceeding the last ten years.

Exclusion criteria:

• Studies that are not directly related to higher education or that focus exclusively on lower educational levels.

• Publications without empirical evidence or without a solid theoretical framework to support their conclusions.

• Articles available only in languages other than Spanish or English, given that these are the predominant languages in the review.

• Grey literature, such as theses, technical reports, blogs or non-peer-reviewed documents, as they do not have the same level of academic validation as indexed publications.

• Compliance with these criteria ensures that the systematic review is based on relevant, high-quality studies, allowing for an in-depth and well-founded analysis of virtual higher education in Bolivia.

Figure 1. Prisma diagram

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Virtual education has emerged as a fundamental educational paradigm in contemporary society, allowing access to learning without location and time limitations.^(7,8) In this context, organizational models are crucial in establishing structures facilitating interaction between educational actors, such as teachers, students, and administrators. These models not only define the internal dynamics of virtual institutions but also significantly impact the quality of teaching and learning. Institutions must adopt strategic approaches that respond to the changing needs of their communities, thus promoting an education that is inclusive and accessible to all.⁽⁹⁾

Virtual education is a teaching-learning process mediated by digital technologies that allows educators and students to access information and interact in virtual environments. Its main characteristics include flexibility in terms of time and place, which facilitates the inclusion of diverse populations and learning styles.⁽¹⁰⁾ It is also based on using digital platforms that enable course management, asynchronous and synchronous communication, and the availability of multimedia educational resources. Virtual education also encourages collaborative learning, excelling in adapting to individual needs, promoting a student-centered approach and self-regulated learning, and online assessments that contribute to feedback and validation of the educational process.⁽¹¹⁾

Therefore, organizational models in virtual institutions are fundamental to guarantee the efficiency and effectiveness of educational processes in digital environments. These models structure the interaction between teachers, students, and administrators and establish the guidelines for the distribution of roles,⁽¹²⁾ time management, and the implementation of appropriate technologies. A transparent organization allows for better integration of resources and a proactive response to learning needs, which translates into a more cohesive and accessible educational experience. Furthermore, by fostering a culture of collaboration and effective communication, these models contribute to creating dynamic learning communities where good practices can be shared and pedagogical innovation is promoted, which is fundamental in the current context of digital transformation.⁽¹³⁾

In this sense, the educational actors in virtual institutions are fundamental to guarantee meaningful and practical learning. Teachers, tutors, and administrators are among them, each with specific and complementary roles.⁽¹⁴⁾ Teachers are responsible for designing the educational content and facilitating the teaching-learning process, while tutors provide continuous support to students, guiding them in their academic and emotional progress. Finally, administrators manage the platforms and resources necessary for the functioning of the virtual environment,⁽¹⁵⁾ ensuring that quality standards are met and good practices are implemented in the educational organization. Effective interaction between these actors creates a collaborative and enriching learning environment.

On the other hand, the role of the teacher in virtual education transcends the mere transmission of knowledge, as they become a facilitator of autonomous and collaborative learning.^(16,17) In this environment, teachers must be able to use various technological tools to encourage student interaction and engagement. This involves creating engaging multimedia content, participating in discussion forums, and offering timely feedback. In addition, teachers must adapt to different learning styles, using a differentiated approach that considers the strengths and weaknesses of each student. At the same time, they must promote self-regulation and responsibility in learning,⁽¹⁸⁾ guiding students in managing their time and resources.

Likewise, the tutor’s roles and responsibilities in virtual environments are vital for students’ academic success. The tutor acts as a bridge between the teacher and the students, providing personalized support and attention to the concerns that arise throughout the educational process.⁽¹⁶⁾ Among their main functions are the monitoring of academic progress, the resolution of doubts, and the motivation of students to actively participate in the dynamics of the course. In addition, the tutor must foster an inclusive and collaborative environment where the opinions and experiences of each student are valued, thus promoting meaningful learning.⁽¹⁹⁾ It is also essential that the tutor maintains constant and accessible communication, using different channels to meet their tutees’ needs effectively.

On the other hand, the role of the administrator in virtual institutions is key to guaranteeing the correct functioning of the educational platform and user satisfaction. This professional is responsible for the technical and operational management of the virtual environment, including user administration, platform supervision, and ensuring that educational quality policies are met.^(20,21) The administrator must also coordinate the development of technological resources that facilitate learning and guarantee that the content is up-to-date and accessible to all students. In addition, the administrator must maintain fluid communication with teachers and tutors to understand their needs and optimize the online learning experience.⁽²²⁾

For this reason, virtual education has been radically transformed by incorporating key technologies that improve the teaching and learning experience. These technologies include learning management platforms (LMS), assessment tools, and innovative teaching resources.^(23,24) LMS platforms allow educators to organize content, manage student interaction, and track academic progress, facilitating a more personalized education. On the other hand, virtual assessment tools help implement practical formative and summative assessments, allowing teachers to measure learning in an accurate and timely manner. Innovative teaching tools such as interactive online classes and multimedia resources enrich the educational process and encourage active student participation.^(25,26)

Therefore, learning management platforms (LMS) are fundamental in virtual education, providing a structured environment where courses, content, and resources can be hosted.⁽²⁷⁾ Among their most outstanding features is the ability to organize course material in an accessible way, the integration of communication tools such as forums and chats to encourage interaction and the possibility of monitoring student performance through analytical reports. An effective LMS should offer flexibility in course creation, customization options, and facilities for continuous assessment.⁽²⁸⁾ This versatility allows not only for the efficient administration of courses but also for the creation of a richer and more adaptive learning experience, adjusting to the needs of each student.⁽²⁹⁾

Similarly, assessment tools in virtual environments are crucial to guarantee learning effectiveness, as they allow educators to measure student performance efficiently and objectively.^(30,31) These tools include online questionnaires, automated assessments, and assessment rubrics, which facilitate grading and constructive feedback. They also offer the possibility of formative assessments throughout the course, allowing students to identify their strengths and areas for improvement.⁽³²⁾ These tools must be accessible and seamlessly integrated into the learning environment, ensuring that the diversity of learning styles is respected and an inclusive environment is promoted. Thus, assessments are not just a means of grading but a valuable strategy for guiding the educational process.^(33,34)

In the same vein, innovative teaching tools play a fundamental role in virtual education, helping to create dynamic and engaging learning experiences.^(35,36) These include technologies such as augmented and virtual reality, which allow students to interact with content in an immersive way, as well as videoconferencing platforms that facilitate real-time communication. Collaborative tools are also essential, fostering teamwork and social learning through shared projects.⁽³⁷⁾ Incorporating gamification in the design of activities has also proven effective in increasing student motivation and engagement. Educators must select and adapt these tools to specific learning objectives, ensuring that each resource used aims to maximize active participation and develop key skills in students.^(38,39)

In this sense, virtual education in Bolivia faces a regulatory framework that seeks to regulate its implementation and guarantee educational quality. This framework, promoted by the Ministry of Education, includes guidelines that establish the parameters for the training and certification of virtual programs. However, the reality reveals that educational institutions still face significant challenges, such as inadequate technological infrastructure, teacher training, and content adaptation. In addition, there is a perceived need to strengthen the supervision and evaluation of institutions operating in the virtual environment. This highlights the importance of creating more effective policies addressing regional contexts’ diversity and the resources available to guarantee inclusive and quality education in virtual environments.⁽⁴⁰⁾

For this reason, the policies of the Ministry of Education in Bolivia have evolved to address the particularities of virtual education, emphasizing inclusion and universal access. A set of regulations has been established to regulate online education, ensuring that these institutions comply with quality standards regarding content, methodologies, and assessments. Among the highlights of these policies is the obligation for virtual education platforms to be registered and authorized and the need for teachers to be trained in educational technologies. However, despite these efforts, challenges remain, such as the lack of a specific framework to regulate the continuous training of educators in virtual environments, which limits the effectiveness of the policies implemented and affects the quality of teaching.⁽⁴¹⁾

Finally, implementing virtual education in Bolivia faces multiple regulatory challenges that impact its development and effectiveness. One of the main problems is the disparity in access to technology and the Internet, which can result in a significant educational gap between different regions of the country. The lack of investment in infrastructure and adequate training makes it difficult for educational policies to be translated into effective practices. Furthermore, there is an urgent need to establish more rigorous control and evaluation mechanisms that ensure the programs’ quality and protect students from fraud and unverified educational offers. In this context, coordination between the government, academic institutions, and regulatory bodies becomes essential to address these challenges and promote accessible, quality virtual education.⁽⁴²⁾

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual higher education in Bolivia represents a key opportunity to democratize access to knowledge and improve the quality of online learning. A comprehensive model that addresses pedagogical, technological, and organizational aspects can significantly consolidate a more inclusive and effective education system. However, for this model to be successful, it is essential to establish a clear and updated regulatory framework that regulates and facilitates the expansion of virtual universities. The absence of specific regulation can create obstacles to consolidating these institutions, limiting their impact on higher education in the country.

Likewise, virtual education’s success largely depends on teacher training and the incorporation of innovative technologies. Educators must acquire digital and methodological skills to design dynamic and compelling learning experiences. In addition, the adoption of advanced technological tools, such as interactive platforms, artificial intelligence, and adaptive learning environments, can enhance the quality of online teaching.

In conclusion, virtual higher education in Bolivia has the potential to transform access to knowledge and academic training, but this requires a joint effort between the State, educational institutions, and teachers. Only through a comprehensive strategy that combines clear policies, teacher training, and technological advances will it be possible to consolidate a sustainable and high-quality online education model.

REFERENCES

1. Navarro, R., Baldeon, G., García, A., Bernal, V. Adaptación del Modelo de Aceptación de Tecnologías para Explorar las Intenciones de Uso en la Educación Virtual. Digital Education Review. [Internet] 2023 Dec. 29. (44), 13-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2023.44.13-22

2. Ordóñez-Ortiz GG, Manchay-Orbea JA, Palacios-González JJ, Cuenca-Mera JX, Manchay-Orbea JC. Virtual university education: opportunities to respond to current changes and challenges. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies [Internet]. 2023;4(3):e23047. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v4i3.664

3. Yépez, M. A. P., Ron, M. V. L., Santillán, I. G., Posso, Á. Condiciones del aprendizaje virtual en época de pandemia en educación básica: Análisis desde el género y la etnia. Digital Education Review, [Internet] 2023 Dec. 29. (44) 83-92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2023.44.83-92

4. Alcón Soler E, Camacho Cuena E, Martin Montaner J. La movilidad virtual en la educación superior de habla hispana. jis [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 6;13(S1). Available from: https://ojed.org/jis/article/view/6601

5. Reyes Mejía MG, Lavanda Reyes FA, Ruiz Reyes RE, Castillo Samanamud LA, Reyes Ruiz JL. educación virtual y el desempeño docente en una universidad pública peruana. revHUMAN [Internet]. 2022;11(Monográfico):1–13. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4242

6. Lozada Maldonado FH, Mobili Roccaro DA. Entornos virtuales para la enseñanza de histología: innovación en ciencias de la salud. rebe [Internet]. 2024;6(11):55–61. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.61287/rebe.v6i11.1182

7. Salazar Mata H, Berlanga-Ramírez J, Zapata-Morán M. Preferencias de aprendizaje a distancia en la educación universitaria ante la pandemia global desatada por el COVID-19. Educ Humanismo [Internet]. 2022;24(43). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.24.43.5646

8. Vega Granda RA, Bazurto Rodríguez IM, Jaramillo Palacios GP. El Constructivismo en entornos virtuales y su aplicación en los estudiantes. propuestas [Internet]. 2023;5(9):28–37. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.61287/propuestaseducativas.v5i19.2

9. Cabrera Félix C. Integración de los recursos tecnológicos en la enseñanza virtual: Impacto y desafíos durante COVID-19. rc [Internet]. 2024;4(8):33–49. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.62319/concordia.v.4i8.31

10. Caballero-Garriazo JA, Rojas-Huacanca JR, Sánchez-Castro A, Lázaro-Aguirre AF. Systematic review on the application of Virtual Reality in University Education. Rev Electrón Educ [Internet]. 2023;27(3):1–18. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-3.17271

11. Flores-Cueto JJ, Garay-Argandoña R, Hernández RM. Modelo de calidad educativa de programas virtuales: Caso de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres. Rev Venez Gerenc [Internet]. 2021;26(6 Edición Especial):697–710. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.26.e6.42

12.  Barral Zegarra R. La educación en des-tiempos del Covid-19. Crisis, tecnologías y futuro. propuestas [Internet]. 2021;3(5):76–85. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.33996/propuestas.v3i5.252

13. Lasnibat Godoy T, Flores Sepúlveda M, Puraivan Huenumán E. Un estudio de clases virtual para promover la construcción del infinito actual en estudiantes de educación media y primer año de universidad desde la perspectiva de la teoría APOE. EduMate [Internet]. 2022;34(3):218–47. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.24844/em3403.08

14. Mesa Rave N, Gómez Marín A, Arango Vásquez SI. Escenarios colaborativos de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediados por tecnología para propiciar interacciones comunicativas en la educación superior. RIED Rev Iberoam Educ Distancia [Internet]. 2023;26(2):259–82. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.2.36241

15. Ramírez García AG, Espejel García A, Pirela Hernández AA, Castillo Escalante IC. Educación virtual: alternativa en un sistema educativo globalizado. Rev Venez Gerenc [Internet]. 2021;26(6 Edición Especial):376–89. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.26.e6.23

16. González Lorente C, Martínez-Clares P, Pérez-Cusó J, González-Morga N. Tutoría universitaria con Kahoot y foros virtuales: una innovación docente en los grados de educación de la Universidad de Murcia. Rev Complut Educ [Internet]. 2023;34(3):495–506. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rced.79477

17. Castillo Vega JM, Cañete-Estigarribia DL. Percepción del profesorado sobre la Educación en tiempos de pandemia en Paraguay. Edutec Rev Electrón Tecnol Educ [Internet]. 2022;(82):332–48. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2022.82.2653

18. Marrero Galván JJ, Hernández Padrón M. La trascendencia de la realidad virtual en la educación STEM: una revisión sistemática desde el punto de vista de la experimentación en el aula. Bordón Rev Pedagog [Internet]. 2022;74(4):45–63. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2022.94179

19. Mostacedo Herbas ME. La evaluación formativa en los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje: Una revisión de la literatura. rebe [Internet]. 2023;5(9):7–22. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.61287/rebe.v5i9.1

20. Granillo-Macias R. Adapting to remote learning during COVID-19: An engineering education approach. Ing Investig [Internet]. 2023;43(3):e101349. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.101349

21. Chavarría Campos PS. Efectos sociales y laborales en las familias del Municipio de Potosí ocasionadas por el COVID-19. rc [Internet]. 2024;4(7):40–50. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.62319/concordia.v.4i7.28

22. Lorenzo Martín E, Reinoso Tapia R, Usategui Martín R, Delgado Iglesias J. Competencia digital del profesorado de educación secundaria en tiempo de COVID-19. Investig em ensino ciênc [Internet]. 2022;27(3):59–77. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2022v27n3p59

23. Gómez-Moreno C, Perez-Mendez A, Hernández-Murillo AM, Ortega-Ortiz C, Cortés-Hernàndez NC, Ávila-Funes JA, et al. Educación en geriatría en México: Revisión del escenario educativo actual en médicos en formación (EDUREV). Investig educ médica [Internet]. 2023;12(48):18–29. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2023.48.23501

24.  Rodríguez Caldera B. Realidad Aumentada en Educación Primaria: Revisión sistemática. Edutec Rev Electrón Tecnol Educ [Internet]. 2021;(77):169–85. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.77.1703

25. Ruiz Mendoza K, Castillo Villapudua K, Arteaga MM. Conclusiones educativas a un año de la Covid-19: ventajas y desventajas de la Educación Remota de Emergencia. rebe [Internet]. 2021;3(5):114–27. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.33996/rebe.v3i5.728

26. Romero-Reverón R. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on current anatomy education: A Venezuelan medical student’s perspective. Gac Med Caracas [Internet]. 2022;130(2). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.47307/gmc.2022.130.2.10

27. Moral-Sánchez SN, Ruiz Rey FJ, Cebrián-de-la-Serna M. Analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots and satisfaction for learning in mathematics education. ijeri [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 15; (20):1-14. Available from: https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/8196

28. Meneses Martínez S, Tobón Tobón S, Gonzales-Sánchez A del C, López-Quesada G, Romero-Carazas R. Training projects, Virtual Education and Pandemic by COVID-19: from opportunity analysis to strategic decision making. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2022;1:40. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.56294/dm202278

29. Estrada Molina O, Fuentes Cancell DR, García Hernández A. El engagement en la educación virtual: Experiencias durante la pandemia COVID-19. Texto Livre [Internet]. 2021;14(2):e33936. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33936

30. Almeida Filho N. Metapresentiality: a foundational concept for a critical theory of digital health. Salud Colect [Internet]. 2023;19:e4655. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18294/sc.2023.4655

31. Ticona M, Zela Payi NO, Vásquez Machicao L. Ansiedad y estrés en la educación virtual en el periodo de emergencia sanitaria por el COVID-19. rcsi [Internet]. 2021;1(2):27–37. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.51252/rcsi.v1i2.161

32. Silva Díaz FR, Fernández-Ferrer G, Vázquez-Vílchez M, Ferrada C, Narváez R, Carrillo-Rosúa J. Tecnologías emergentes en la educación STEM. Análisis bibliométrico de publicaciones en Scopus y WoS (2010-2020). Bordón Rev Pedagog [Internet]. 2022;74(4):25–44. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2022.94198

33. Avendaño WR, Luna HO, Rueda G. Educación virtual en tiempos de COVID-19: percepciones de estudiantes universitarios. Form Univ [Internet]. 2021;14(5):119–28. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062021000500119

34. Ayala R. Un zoom a la educación virtual: biopolítica y aprendizaje centrado en el estudiante. Educ médica [Internet]. 2021;22(3):177–80. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2021.01.004

35. Castelo-Rivas WP, Pardo Santoru ME, Manzano Albán JI, Cedeño Recalde AR, Jaramillo RA. Estrés académico, salud mental y funcionamiento familiar de estudiantes de enfermería en condiciones de educación virtual. Revista Cubana de Medicina General Integral. 2023;(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-21252023000400010&script=sci_arttext

36. Abreu JM, Guimarães B, Castelo-Branco M. The role of virtual interactive simulators in medical education: Exploring their integration as an assessment methodology in clinical years. Educ médica [Internet]. 2021;22(6):325–9. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2021.06.011

37. Quiñones-Negrete MM, Martin-Cuadrado AM, Coloma-Manrique CR. Rendimiento académico y factores educativos de estudiantes del programa de educación en entorno virtual. Influencia de variables docentes. Form Univ [Internet]. 2021;14(3):25–36. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062021000300025

38. Mantilla Contreras MA, Lopez Cacua J. MOOC, a tool for strengthening mathematical competencies in higher education. J Res Math Educ [Internet]. 2021;10(3):318–40. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/redimat.8563

39. Goyzueta Rivera SI. Factores de impacto en el aprendizaje virtual en los estudiantes de la Universidad Católica Boliviana “San Pablo” Regional Cochabamba. propuestas [Internet]. 2021;3(5):10–42. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.33996/propuestas.v3i5.249

40. Tuesta Panduro JA, Diaz Espinoza M, Castillo Salazar RN, Criollo Hidalgo V. Responsabilidad social de la universidad peruana en el contexto de la educación virtual. Rev Cienc Soc - Univ Zulia, Fac Cienc Econ Soc [Internet]. 2022;Esp. 28(6):329–39. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28073815023

41. Manzanilla-Granados HM, Navarrete-Cazales Z, López-Hernández PA. POLÍTICAS EDUCATIVAS PARA LA INNOVACIÓN, INCLUSIÓN Y TIC EN BOLIVIA, PARAGUAY Y URUGUAY. Educ Soc [Internet]. 2023;44. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/es.261474

42. Vera EJZ, Inga CV, Nizama GES, Santisteban JSG, Salazar EJA, del Pilar Mercedes Pajuelo Villarreal R. Desafíos del aula invertida para la educación universitaria en los Países Andinos [Internet]. 2023. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gnsm4

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

The authors did not receive financial support for the development of this research.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORSHIP

Conceptualization: Richard Jorge Torrez Juani.

Data curation: Edgar Olivares Alvares.

Formal analysis: Piter Henry Escobar Callejas.

Research: Edgar Olivares Alvares.

Methodology: Ramiro José Iglesias Pérez.

Project administration: Piter Henry Escobar Callejas.

Resources: Pablo José Guerrero.

Software: Ramiro José Iglesias Pérez.

Supervision: Piter Henry Escobar Callejas.

Validation: Richard Jorge Torrez Juani.

Visualization: Pablo José Guerrero.

Writing – original draft: Edgar Olivares Alvares.

Writing – review and editing: Richard Jorge Torrez Juani.