Doctor-Patient Trust and Communication: A Dyadic Perspective on Relationship Interdependence and Reciprocity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023110

Keywords:

Doctor-Patient, Trust, Communication, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Emotional Support

Abstract

Interpersonal trust shows a fundamental role in shaping the quality of doctor-patient interactions, directly influencing communication effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and adherence to medical recommendations. Understanding the dynamic interplay between doctor and patient trust levels can provide deeper insights into how communication processes unfold and how trust influences these exchanges. This exploration aims to explore the association between interpersonal trust and the quality of dyadic communication in healthcare settings. 200 participants were selected and participated in structured interviews and completed trust and communication quality assessments. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 26) and AMOS for Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and regression analysis were performed to explore associations among the variables, while SEM was applied to test the structural relationships between trust perception, communication effectiveness, and adherence. The findings revealed a regression analyses of trust perception (β = 0.68, t =8.92) and doctor’s responsiveness (β = 0.64, t = 8.11). SEM results confirmed that higher trust perception significantly improves doctor communication (β = 0.68, p < 0.01), enhances patient trust (β = 0.64, p < 0.01), and doctor responsiveness (β = 0.63, p < 0.01). Additionally, improved communication effectiveness acted as a mediator between trust perception and patient adherence, reinforcing the importance of trust-building efforts. The investigation highlights that interpersonal trust plays a crucial role in enhancing doctor-patient communication. Higher trust levels lead to clearer information exchange, stronger emotional support, and greater adherence to medical advice.

References

1. Gu L, Deng J, Xu H, Zhang S, Gao M, Qu Z, Zhang W, Tian D. The impact of contract service policy and doctor communication skills on rural patient-doctor trust relationship in the village clinics of three counties. BMC Health Services Research. 2019 Dec; 19:1-9.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3875-x

2. Wei D, Xu A, Wu X. The mediating effect of trust on the relationship between doctor-patient communication and patients' risk perception during treatment. PsyCh journal. 2020 Jun; 9(3):383-91.https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.327

3. Du L, Wu R, Chen X, Xu J, Ji H, Zhou L. Role of treatment adherence, doctor–patient trust, and communication in predicting treatment effects among tuberculosis patients: difference between urban and rural areas. Patient preference and adherence. 2020 Nov 24:2327-36. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S277650

4. Du L, Xu J, Chen X, Zhu X, Zhang Y, Wu R, Ji H, Zhou L. Rebuild doctor–patient trust in medical service delivery in China. Scientific reports. 2020 Dec 15; 10(1):21956.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78921-y

5. Jiang S. The relationship between face-to-face and online patient-provider communication: examining the moderating roles of patient trust and patient satisfaction. Health communication. 2020 Feb 23.https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1563030

6. Honavar SG. Patient–physician relationship–Communication is the key. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2018 Nov 1; 66(11):1527-8.https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1760_18

7.Chakr VC. Building up trust in the doctor-patient relationship. Andes Pediatrica. 2021 Jun 22; 92(3):480-2.

8.Ray A, Pathak-Ray V. Withering trust: Redefining the doctor patient relationship. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2018 Nov 1; 66(11):1529-30.https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_821_18

9. Petrocchi S, Iannello P, Lecciso F, Levante A, Antonietti A, Schulz PJ. Interpersonal trust in doctor-patient relation: Evidence from dyadic analysis and association with quality of dyadic communication. Social science & medicine. 2019 Aug 1; 235:112391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112391

10. Hesse C, Rauscher EA. The relationships between doctor-patient affectionate communication and patient perceptions and outcomes. Health communication. 2019 Jul 3; 34(8):881-91.https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1439269

11. Chang PC, Wu T, Du J. Psychological contract violation and patient’s antisocial behaviour: A moderated mediation model of patient trust and doctor-patient communication. International Journal of Conflict Management. 2020 Jun 18; 31(4):647-64.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-07-2019-0119

12. Akseer R, Connolly M, Cosby J, Frost G, Kanagarajah RR, Lim SH. Clinician–patient relationships after two decades of a paradigm of patient-centered care. International Journal of Healthcare Management. 2021 Jul 3; 14(3):888-97.https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1713535

13. Mazzi MA, Rimondini M, van der Zee E, Boerma W, Zimmermann C, Bensing J. Which patient and doctor behaviours make a medical consultation more effective from a patient point of view. Results from a European multicentre study in 31 countries. Patient education and counseling. 2018 Oct 1; 101(10):1795-803.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.019

14.Hong H, Oh HJ. The effects of patient-centered communication: exploring the mediating role of trust in healthcare providers. Health communication. 2020 Mar 20; 35(4):502-11.https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1570427

15.Parker L, Ryan R, Young S, Hill S. Medications and doctor-patient communication. Australian journal of general practice. 2021 Oct 1; 50(10):709-14.https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.079370789996250

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Varma P, Sarkar A, Dash M. Doctor-Patient Trust and Communication: A Dyadic Perspective on Relationship Interdependence and Reciprocity. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Mar. 10];2:110. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/110