Comprehensive Evaluation of Computerized Information Systems in Enhancing Nursing Practice and Clinical Decisions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023123

Keywords:

Computerized Health Information Systems (CHIS), Nursing Practice, Evidence-Based Practice, Clinical Decision-Making, Clinical Education, Workflow Efficiency

Abstract

Nursing practice has been revolutionized by the incorporation of computerized health information systems into clinical settings, which have improved workflow efficiency, supported evidence-based decision-making, and improved patient data management. The efficacy in enhancing clinical decision-making and nursing practice requires a thorough assessment. The purpose of the research is to examine how computerized health information systems affect clinical decision-making, patient safety, and nursing workflows while identifying critical elements that affect efficacy in various healthcare settings. A comprehensive survey with an emphasis on system usability, integration into clinical processes, and perceived influence on patient outcomes was administered to 210 registered nurses from different hospital units. To achieve a comprehensive assessment, a mixed-method approach was used, combining qualitative observations and quantitative statistical analysis. It examines how computerized health information systems boost multidisciplinary collaboration, increase documentation accuracy, and assist clinical decision-making in real-time. To investigate the connections between system effectiveness, user experience, and clinical performance, descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used, such as regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results show computerized health information systems greatly enhance decision support, clinical workflow effectiveness, and documentation accuracy. It emphasizes how crucial computerized health information systems are to contemporary nursing practice. Maximizing the influence of systems on patient care and decision-making requires improving system design, ensuring training is appropriate, and matching features with clinical requirements. 

References

1. Miller EM, Hill PD. Intuition in clinical decision making: Differences among practicing nurses. Journal of Holistic Nursing. 2018 Dec;36(4):318-29.https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010117725428

2. Zaybak A, Özdemir H, Erol A, Ismailoğlu EG. An Exploration of Nursing Students' Clinical Decision‐Making Process. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 2018 Oct 1;29(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12179

3. Razieh S, Somayeh G, Fariba H. Effects of reflection on clinical decision-making of intensive care unit nurses. Nurse education today. 2018 Jul 1;66:10-4.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.009

4. White KA, Fetter ME, Ruth-Sahd LA. Extern programs promote confidence and reduce anxiety with clinical decision-making in nursing students. Nurse educator. 2019 Sep 1;44(5):239-44.https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000625

5. Chung FF, Wang PY, Lin SC, Lee YH, Wu HY, Lin MH. Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: qualitative research. BMC nursing. 2021 Jun 1;20(1):85.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00597-0

6. Duarte HM, Dixe MD. Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS-PT©) in nursing students: translation and validation. Revistabrasileira de enfermagem. 2021 Sep 1;74(suppl 6):e20210032.https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0032

7. Wright J, Scardaville D. A nursing residency program: A window into clinical judgment and clinical decision making. Nurse Education in Practice. 2021 Jan 1;50:102931.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.09.014

8. Farčić N, Barać I, Plužarić J, Ilakovac V, Pačarić S, Gvozdanović Z, Lovrić R. Personality traits of core self-evaluation as predictors on clinical decision-making in the nursing profession. Plos one. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233435.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233435

9. Inangil D, Cura ŞÜ. Nursing students’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses and clinical decision-making. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2020 Apr 1;10(2):131-6.https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.568335

10. Bagnasco A, Dasso N, Rossi S, Timmins F, Aleo G, Catania G, Zanini M, Sasso L. A qualitative descriptive inquiry of the influences on nurses' missed care decision‐making processes in acute hospital pediatric care. Journal of nursing management. 2020 Nov;28(8):1929-39.https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12935

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Nayak D, Jayakumar SS, Mehta S. Comprehensive Evaluation of Computerized Information Systems in Enhancing Nursing Practice and Clinical Decisions. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Mar. 10];2:123. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/123