Health Informatics Systems for Information and Decisional Control in Cancer Patients' Medical Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023129Keywords:
Health Informatics Systems (HIS), Cancer Patients, Decision-Making, Medical Advice, Decisional ControlAbstract
Health Informatics Systems (HIS) are technology-based solutions that enhance healthcare efficiency by collecting, managing, and analyzing health data, including electronic health records, clinical decision support systems, and telemedicine platforms. HISs utilize technology to manage healthcare data, improve patient care, and enhance decision-making. The aim is to develop and evaluate HIS that enhances information management and decisional control in cancer patients' medical decision-making, ensuring informed and patient-centered care. The research surveyed 412 individuals who had been diagnosed with cancer. To ensure a diverse patient population, participants were selected from multiple healthcare institutions. The analysis utilized the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) to assess patients' preferred level of involvement in medical decisions. Patients were grouped into four decision-making categories: self-reliant, guided decision-making, co-decision, and non-participatory. The data was analyzed using SPSS 26 software to guarantee methodological rigor and reliability. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) compare means across multiple groups to determine whether significant differences exist in decision-making preferences among cancer types. Self-reliance and guided decision-making are prevalent in the early stages, while non-participatory decision-making increases in the advanced stages. Logistic regression shows significant associations between HIS usage and decision-making styles. ANOVA confirms statistical differences in decision-making approaches across different patient groups. The findings highlight the diverse decision-making preferences among cancer patients, emphasizing the need for tailored HIS that support informed, and patient-centered care. Enhancing real-time data access and predictive insights can empower patients and improve collaborative decision-making in oncology.
References
1. Allen LA, Venechuk G, McIlvennan CK, Page RL, Knoepke CE, Helmkamp LJ, Khazanie P, Peterson PN, Pierce K, Harger G, Thompson JS. An electronically delivered patient-activation tool for intensification of medications for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the EPIC-HF trial. Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):427-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0702-z
2. Treffers T, Putora PM. Emotions as social information in shared decision-making in oncology. Oncology. 2020 Jun 17;98(6):430-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505341
3. Tricou C, Yennu S, Ruer M, Bruera E, Filbet M. Decisional control preferences of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care. Palliative & supportive care. 2018 Oct;16(5):544-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000803
4. Dutta O, Lall P, Patinadan PV, Car J, Low CK, Tan WS, Ho AH. Patient autonomy and participation in end-of-life decision-making: An interpretive-systemic focus group study on perspectives of Asian healthcare professionals. Palliative & supportive care. 2020 Aug;18(4):425-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951519000865
5. Rundo L, Pirrone R, Vitabile S, Sala E, Gambino O. Recent advances of HCI in decision-making tasks for optimized clinical workflows and precision medicine. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2020 Aug 1;108:103479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103479
6. Ankolekar A, Vanneste BG, Bloemen-van Gurp E, van Roermund JG, van Limbergen EJ, van de Beek K, Marcelissen T, Zambon V, Oelke M, Dekker A, Roumen C. Development and validation of a patient decision aid for prostate Cancer therapy: from paternalistic towards participative shared decision making. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2019 Dec;19:1-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0862-4
7. Aljabri D, Dumitrascu A, Burton MC, White L, Khan M, Xirasagar S, Horner R, Naessens J. Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2018 Dec;18:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4
8. Agarwal R, Epstein AS. Advanced care planning and end-of-life decision-making for patients with cancer. In Seminars in oncology nursing 2018 Aug 1 (Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 316-326). WB Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.012
9. Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Torres-Castaño A, Ramos-Garcia V, Alvarez-Perez Y, Gonzalez-Hernandez N, Buron A, Pignone M, Serrano-Aguilar P. Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2019 Dec;19:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6
10. Wilson LS, Blonquist TM, Hong F, Halpenny B, Wolpin S, Chang P, Filson CP, Master VA, Sanda MG, Chien GW, Jones RA. Assigning value to preparation for prostate cancer decision making: a willingness to pay analysis. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2019 Dec;19:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0725-4
11. van Dams R, Grogan T, Lee P, Punglia R, Raldow A. Impact of health-related quality of life and prediagnosis risk of major depressive disorder on treatment choice for stage I lung cancer. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 2019 Sep;1:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.19.00072
12. Filson CP, Hong F, Xiong N, Pozzar R, Halpenny B, Berry DL. Decision support for men with prostate cancer: concordance between treatment choice and tumor risk. Cancer. 2021 Jan 15;127(2):2038. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33241
13. Fagerlin A, Holmes-Rovner M, Hofer TP, Rovner D, Alexander SC, Knight SJ, Ling BS, A. Tulsky J, Wei JT, Hafez K, Kahn VC. Head to head randomized trial of two decision aids for prostate cancer. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2021 May 12;21(1):154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01505-x
14. Hlubocky FJ, Sher TG, Cella D, Wroblewski KE, Peppercorn J, Daugherty CK. Anxiety shapes expectations of therapeutic benefit in phase I trials for patients with advanced cancer and spousal caregivers. JCO oncology practice. 2021 Feb;17(2):e101-10. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00646
15. Bombard Y, Clausen M, Shickh S, Mighton C, Casalino S, Kim TH, Muir SM, Carlsson L, Baxter N, Scheer A, Elser C. Effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER decision aid for the selection of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: a randomized clinical trial. Genetics in Medicine. 2020 Apr;22(4):727-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0702-z.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Soumya Surath Panda , Manashree Mane , Sourabh Kumar Singh (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
