Exploring Health Professionals' Perspectives on Patient Confidentiality and Contributing Factors in Resource-Limited Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023142Keywords:
Health Professionals, Patient Confidentiality, Knowledge, Awareness, Contributing FactorsAbstract
Patient confidentiality is a fundamental ethical and legal obligation for healthcare professionals and a critical component of high-quality patient care. However, maintaining confidentiality in resource-limited environments presents significant challenges. This research explores health professionals' perspectives on patient confidentiality and the factors influencing their knowledge, awareness, and behaviors in such settings. 323 health professionals participated, using an organized, individually conducted questionnaire established on expert validation and appropriate influencing factors. The research examined socio-demographic, work-related, and institutional factors that can impact health professionals' perspectives on patient confidentiality. The data was analyzed using SPSS 25.0, employing descriptive statistics, t-tests, and regression analysis to assess the relationships between variables. The results indicate that only 29.5% of participants exhibited positive behaviors toward patient confidentiality, while 42.2% demonstrated good knowledge, and 30.3% were aware of confidentiality principles. The findings reveal that while healthcare professionals possess a reasonable understanding of patient confidentiality, their behavioral adherence remains limited. Strengthening training programs, institutional policies and ethical awareness initiatives is crucial to enhancing healthcare professionals' knowledge and behaviors, ultimately fostering patient trust, legal compliance, and improved healthcare quality in resource-limited environments.
References
1. Ewuoso C. Patient confidentiality, the duty to protect, and psychotherapeutic care: perspectives from the philosophy of Ubuntu. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2021 Apr;42(1):41-59.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0
2. Balikuddembe JK, Reinhardt JD. Can digitization of health care help low-resourced countries provide better community-based rehabilitation services? Physical therapy. 2020 Feb;100(2):217-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzz162
3. Griffiths F, Watkins JA, Huxley C, Harris B, Cave J, Pemba S, Chipwaza B, Lilford R, Ajisola M, Arvanitis TN, Bakibinga P. Mobile consulting (mConsulting) and its potential for providing access to quality healthcare for populations living in low-resource settings of low-and middle-income countries. Digital health. 2020 Apr;6:2055207620919594. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620919594
4. McGraw D, Mandl KD. Privacy protections to encourage the use of health-relevant digital data in a learning health system. NPJ digital medicine. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00362-8
5. Shah SM, Khan RA. Secondary use of electronic health record: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Access. 2020 Jul 22;8:136947-65. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3011099
6. Lustgarten SD, Garrison YL, Sinnard MT, Flynn AW. Digital privacy in mental healthcare: current issues and recommendations for technology use. Current opinion in psychology. 2020 Dec 1;36:25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.012
7. Gonzalez R, Gasco J, Llopis J. Information and communication technologies and human resources in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2020 Nov 13;32(11):3545-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0272
8. van Boekholt TA, Duits AJ, Busari JO. Health care transformation in a resource-limited environment: exploring the determinants of a good climate for change. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2019 Feb 28:173-82. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S194180
9. Wagner A, Rieger MA, Manser T, Sturm H, Hardt J, Martus P, Lessing C, Hammer A, WorkSafeMed Consortium E. Luntz MA Rieger H. Sturm A. Wagner A. Hammer T. Manser P. Martus M. Holderried. Healthcare professionals' perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research. 2019 Dec;19:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7
10. Goldstein RF, Walker RE, Teede HJ, Harrison CL, Boyle JA. The healthy pregnancy service to optimize excess gestational weight gain for women with obesity: a qualitative study of health professionals' perspectives. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020 Dec 17;9(12):4073. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124073
11. Nyoni CN, Grobler C, Botma Y. Towards continuing interprofessional education: Interaction patterns of health professionals in a resource-limited setting. PloS one. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253491. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253491
12. Lee K, Lim K, Jung SY, Ji H, Hong K, Hwang H, Lee HY. Perspectives of patients, health care professionals, and developers toward blockchain-based health information exchange: qualitative study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020 Nov 13;22(11):e18582. https://doi.org/10.2196/18582
13. Enaizan O, Zaidan AA, Alwi NH, Zaidan BB, Alsalem MA, Albahri OS, Albahri AS. Electronic medical record systems: Decision support examination framework for individual, security, and privacy concerns using multi-perspective analysis. Health and Technology. 2020 May;10:795-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0278-7
14. Mogre V, Johnson NA, Tzelepis F, Paul C. Barriers to diabetic self‐care: A qualitative study of patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2296-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14835
15. Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T. The potential of blockchain technology for health information exchange: experimental study from patients’ perspectives. Journal of medical Internet research. 2019 Jun 20;21(6):e14184. https://doi.org/10.2196/14184
16. Wei H, Corbett RW, Ray J, Wei TL. A culture of caring: the essence of healthcare interprofessional collaboration. Journal of interprofessional care. 2020 May 3;34(3):324-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1641476
17. Basholli A, Lagkas T, Bath PA, Eleftherakis G. Sensor-based platforms for remote management of chronic diseases in developing regions: a qualitative approach examining the perspectives of healthcare professionals. Health informatics journal. 2021 Jan;27(1):1460458220979350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220979350.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ved Vrat Verma , Samir Samal , Jyothi S. Renuka (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
