Investigating Factors Affecting Prosthetic Use and Adjustment in Lower Limb Amputee Rehabilitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023147Keywords:
Prosthetic Use, Lower Limb Amputation, Rehabilitation, Adjustment, Functional MobilityAbstract
Successful rehabilitation following lower limb amputation relies on effective prosthetic use and adjustment, influenced by various physical, psychological, and environmental factors. Understanding these factors is essential for optimizing rehabilitation strategies and improving amputees' quality of life. Research investigates the key factors affecting prosthetic use and adjustment in lower limb amputee rehabilitation, focusing on prosthetic functionality, user characteristics, psychosocial adaptation, and rehabilitation-related influences. A total of 298 adult’s lower limb amputees participated in structured interviews. Patient demographics, amputation-related information, prosthetic use, and the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) were all evaluated using standardized questionnaires to gather data. Key factors analyzed included physical and health, psychological, activity, functional and lifestyle, personal and social, and environmental factors. Statistical analysis methods, including descriptive statistics, correlation and regression analysis, were conducted to determine significant associations between prosthetic use and adjustment outcomes. Findings show that prosthetic satisfaction was usually positive, and participants reported functional mobility and moderate psychological adjustment. The use of prosthetics, socket fit, residual limb health, and daily prosthesis wear time were important factors affecting prosthetic use. Employment position, psychological resilience, social reintegration, and access to rehabilitation were all substantially correlated with adjustment results. Research emphasizes that to optimize prosthesis use and long-term adjustment, rehabilitation must incorporate medical, psychological, and social support measures.
References
1. Desrochers J, Frengopoulos C, Payne MW, Viana R, Hunter SW. Relationship between body image and physical functioning following rehabilitation for lower-limb amputation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2019 Mar 1;42(1):85-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000329.
2. Amorelli C, Yancosek K, Morris R. Amputees Unanimous: A 12-step program. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2019 Jun;43(3):293-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364619836027.
3. Talbot SG, Carty MJ, Jensen SE, Dumanian GA. Adjustment to amputation and interest in upper limb transplantation. SAGE open medicine. 2019 Jun;7:2050312119858248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119858248.
4. Dekker R, Hristova YV, Hijmans JM, Geertzen JH. Pre-operative rehabilitation for dysvascular lower-limb amputee patients: A focus group study involving medical professionals. Plos one. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0204726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204726.
5. Cutti AG, Verni G, Migliore GL, Amoresano A, Raggi M. Reference values for gait temporal and loading symmetry of lower-limb amputees can help in refocusing rehabilitation targets. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2018 Sep;15:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0403-x.
6. Richardson C, Olleveant N, Crawford K, Kulkarni J. Exploring the role of cortical reorganization in postamputation phantom phenomena, including phantom limb pain in lower limb amputees: a cross-sectional study of the patterns of referral of sensations into the phantom. Pain Management Nursing. 2018 Dec 1;19(6):599-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2018.04.004.
7. Westerkamp EA, Strike SC, Patterson M. Dietary intakes and prevalence of overweight/obesity in male non-dysvascular lower limb amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2019 Jun;43(3):284-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364618823118.
8. Saetta G, Grond I, Brugger P, Lenggenhager B, Tsay AJ, Giummarra MJ. Apparent motion perception in lower limb amputees with phantom sensations:“obstacle shunning” and “obstacle tolerance”. Cortex. 2018 Jul 1;104:220-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.003.
9. Henson DP, Edgar C, Ding Z, Sivapuratharasu B, Le Feuvre P, Finnegan ME, Quest R, McGregor AH, Bull AM. Understanding lower limb muscle volume adaptations to amputation. Journal of biomechanics. 2021 Aug 26;125:110599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110599.
10. Turner S, McGregor AH. Perceived effect of socket fit on major lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation: a clinician and amputee perspective. Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation. 2020 Sep 1;2(3):100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100059.
11. Şimsek N, Öztürk GK, Nahya ZN. The mental health of individuals with post-traumatic lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. Journal of patient experience. 2020 Dec;7(6):1665-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520932451.
12. Chen L, Feng Y, Chen B, Wang Q, Wei K. Improving postural stability among people with lower-limb amputations by tactile sensory substitution. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2021 Dec;18:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00952-x.
13. Charkhkar H, Christie BP, Triolo RJ. Sensory neuroprosthesis improves postural stability during Sensory Organization Test in lower-limb amputees. Scientific reports. 2020 Apr 24;10(1):6984. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63936-2.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Samir Ranjan Jena , Jyothi S. Renuka , Ranjana Singh (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
