Psychometric validation of the REM Spirituality Index: Approach to a new typology of spirituality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023153Keywords:
Spirituality, Search for Meaning, Assistance to Others, Self-Care, Intrapersonal or Reflective Spirituality, Relational or Prosocial SpiritualityAbstract
Introduction: the present study aims to analyze the psychometric properties of the REM Spirituality Scale by evaluating four subscales: self-care, connections, assistance to others, and search for existential meaning and significance.
Methods: An instrumental study was conducted to analyze the psychometric properties of a scale designed to assess spirituality, specifically in its self-care dimension. We worked with a purposive sample of 60 adults who were administered a self-administered questionnaire of 100 items corresponding to the self-care subscale of the REM Spirituality Index. A reliability analysis (Cronbach's alpha) and an Exploratory Factor Analysis were carried out to examine each subscale's internal consistency and underlying factor structure.
Results: The results show adequate internal consistency in the four dimensions (α between 0.68 and 0.92) and differentiated factor structures that reflect the multidimensionality of spirituality. In particular, factors linked to self-care, meaningful social relationships, altruism, and the search for existential purpose were identified.
Conclusions: The differentiation between internal spirituality (focused on self-care and personal reflection) and external spirituality (focused on social connections and altruistic helping) is proposed, which broadens the theoretical understanding of the construct of spirituality and its psychometric measurement.
References
1. Miller WR, Thoresen CE. Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field. American Psychologist. 2003; 58(1): p. 24-35.
2. Koenig HG. Spirituality & Health Research: Methods, Measurement, Statistics, and Resources United States: Templeton Press; 2011.
3. Godbey G. Leisure and leisure services in the 21st century United States: Venture Publishing; 2009.
4. Baltes PB. Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology. 1998; 34(6): p. 611-622.
5. Armstrong K. La gran transformación España: Paidós; 2008.
6. House J. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988; 241: p. 540–545.
7. Reyes-Garza G, Eslava-Zapata R. Sense of Belonging: A key construct in leadership management. Health Leadership and Quality of Life. 2023; 2: p. 209.
8. Chacón-Guerrero E, Eslava-Zapata R, Sánchez Castillo V. Analysis of leadership styles in Latin American managers: An approach based on the Blake & Mouton test. Health Leadership and Quality of Life. 2023; 2: p. 291.
9. Kottak CP. Cultural anthropology: Appreciating cultural diversity United States: McGraw Hill; 2022.
10. Hill PC, Pargament KI. Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. American Psychologist. 2003; 58(1): p. 64–74.
11. Gallup G. The Gallup poll: Public opinion 1995 United States: Scholarly Resources; 1995.
12. McCullough ME. Research on religion-accommodative counseling: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1999; 46(1): p. 92–98.
13. Kelly EW. Counselor values: A national survey. Journal of Counseling and Development. 1995; 73: p. 648–653.
14. Shafranske EP, Maloney HN. Clinical psychologists’ religious and spiritual orientation and their practice of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy. 1990; 27(1): p. 72–78.
15. Brawer PA, Handal PJ, Fabricatore AN, Roberts R, Wajda-Johnston VA. Training and education in religion/spirituality within APA-accredited clinical psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2022; 33: p. 203–206.
16. Richards PS, Bergin AE. A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy United States: American Psychological Association; 1997.
17. Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and health: Research and clinical applications. ISRN Psychiatry. 2012;: p. 278730.
18. Montero I, León OG. A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2007; 7(3): p. 847-862.
19. Koenig HG. Spirituality & health research: Methods, measurement, statistics, and resources United States: Templeton Press; 2012.
20. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. [Online].; 2017.. Disponible en: https://www.apa.org/ethics/code.
21. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications (4a ed.) United States: Sage ; 2017.
22. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory United States: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
23. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis United States: Cengage Learning; 2019.
24. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics United Kingdom: Pearson; 2019.
25. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS United Kingdom: Routledge; 2020.
26. Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de Helsinki – Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. [Online].; 2013.. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki.
27. González-García JC, Lozano-Pineda C, Cuartas-Díaz M, Torres-Barreto ML. Ejercicio lúdico gamificado enfocado en la inteligencia emocional. Región Científica. 2023; 2(1): p. 202365.
28. Gómez-Ortiz EJ, Peñaranda-Soto E. El nuevo liderazgo y la transformación de las organizaciones del siglo XXI. Revista Gestión y Desarrollo Libre. ; 5(9): p. 217-235.
29. Ruiz-Díaz-de-Salvioni VV. Estrategias innovadoras para un aprendizaje continuo y efectivo durante emergencias sanitarias en Ciudad del Este. Región Científica. 2023; 2(1): p. 202338.
30. Hall TW, Edwards KJ. The Spiritual Assessment Inventory: A theistic model and measure for assessing spiritual development. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2022; 41: p. 341–357.
31. Krause N. Neighborhood deterioration, religious coping, and changes in health during late life. The Gerontologist. 1998; 38: p. 653–664.
32. Wheatley MT, Kellner-Rogers M. The community of the future San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers & The Peter Drucker Foundation; 1998.
33. Méndez-Suárez P, Arteaga-Ciavato PA, aimes-Gauta GA. Liderazgo y participación de la mujer en la toma de decisiones en las empresas. Revista Gestión y Desarrollo Libre. 2023; 8(16): p. 1-10.
34. Quiroz-Leal S. Tipos de liderazgo: una perspectiva liberadora desde la consejería profesional. Revista Gestión y Desarrollo Libre. 2021; 6(12).
35. Lazarus RS, Delongis A. Psychological stress and coping in aging. American Psychologist. 1983; 38: p. 245–254.
36. Payne EC, Robbins SB, Dougherty L. Goal-directedness and older-adult adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1991; 38(3): p. 302–308.
37. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference United States: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
38. Kline P. A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design United Kingdom: Routledge; 2015.
39. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics United States: Sage ; 2018.
40. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2005; 10(1): p. 7.
41. Howard MC. A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2016; 32(1): p. 51-62.
42. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods. 1999; 4(3): p. 272-299.
43. Muñiz J. Teoría clásica de los tests España: Pirámide; 2018.
44. Pargament KI. Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred United States: Guilford Press; 2007.
45. Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernández-Baeza A, Tomás-Marco I. Exploratory factor analysis of the items: A practical guide. Anales de Psicología. 2014; 30(3): p. 1151-1169.
46. Oviedo HC, Campo-Arias A. Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría. 2005; 34(4): p. 572-580.
47. Kaiser HF, Rice J. Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1974; 34(1): p. 111-117.
48. Carlo G, Randall BA. The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2002; 31(1): p. 31-44.
49. Batson CD. Altruism in humans New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
50. Rushton JP, Chrisjohn RD, Fekken GC. The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences. 1981; 2(4): p. 293-302.
51. Frankl VE. El hombre en busca de sentido España: Herder; 2004.
52. Pargament KL, Kennell J, Hathaway W, Grevengoed N, Newman J, Jones W. Religion and the problem-solving process: Three styles of coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1988; 27: p. 90–104.
53. Eslava-Zapata R, Montilla RE, Guerrero EC, Gómez-Cano CA, Gómez-Ortiz E. Social Responsibility: A bibliometric analysis of research state and its trend. Data and Metadata. 2023; 2: p. 117-128.
54. Saroglou V. Religion, spirituality, and altruism. In Handbook of altruism and prosocial behavior United States: American Psychological Association; 2013.
55. Gottlieb RS. Spirituality: What it is and why it matters New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
56. Quiroz-Leal S, Eslava-Zapata R. Teacher motivation: An empirical study with teachers educating students with identified disabilities in a diverse classroom environment. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2023; 2: p. 1-12.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rómulo Esteban Montilla, Edixon Chacón-Guerrero, Rolando Eslava-Zapata (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
