Professional ethics in the field of scientific publications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202340Keywords:
Ethics in Scientific Publication, Scientific Misconduct, Plagiarism, Scientific PublicationAbstract
Nowadays, more and more people want to publish their research, which has led to an increase in incorrect practices related to ethics and are called scientific misconduct. This paper aims to characterize the fundamental manifestations of misconduct in scientific research and the ways to combat them, for this purpose a search of bibliographies in databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and SciELO was carried out, where the search strategies used were: ethics in scientific publication, plagiarism and scientific misconduct, publications in Spanish and English were considered, using 18 references. Finally, it was determined that the main ethical misconduct in scientific publications include invention, falsification, plagiarism, etc. and that the best way to combat them is to resort to formative evaluation at different levels of undergraduate and graduate studies
References
1. Castro-Rodríguez Y. El plagio académico desde la perspectiva de la ética de la publicación científica. Rev Cub Inf En Cienc Salud. 2020;31(4).
2. Rodríguez-Venegas E de la C, Zamora-Fung R. Autoría y dilemas éticos en la publicación científica. Rev Cub Med. 2021; 60(1).
3. Guraya SY, Guraya SS. The confounding factors leading to plagiarism in academic writing and some suggested remedies: A systematic Review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(5):767-72.
4. Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism, and Text Recycling: Ethical Problem in Academic Publication. Headache. 2019;59(1):107.
5. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practices. 2018. https://publicationethics.org/files/u7141/1999pdf13.pdf
6. Halgamuge MN. The use and analysis of anti-plagiarism software: Turnitin tool for formative assessment and feedback. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2017;25(6):1-15.
7. Aliukonis V, Margarita Poškuté M, Gefenas E. Perish or Publish Dilemma: Challenges to Responsible Authorship. Medicina. 2020; 56:123.
8. Abad-García MF. El plagio y las revistas depredadoras como amenaza a la integridad científica. Anales de Pediatría. 2019; 90(1):e1-e8.
9. Del Río Martínez JH, Del Río Valdés DC. Ética y conductas inapropiadas en la práctica de la investigación. Rev Med Ética[Internet]. 2020[citado el 30 de septiembre del 2021]; 31(1):49-69.
10. Zúñiga Vargas JP. Comportamiento ético en la publicación científica: malas conductas y acciones para evitarlas. Rev Educ. 2020;44(1):428-37.
11. Solís Sánchez G, Cano Garcinuño A, Antón Gamaero M, Manrique de Lara LA, Rey Galán C. Plagio y ética en las publicaciones científicas. An Pediatr (Barc). 2019; 90(1): 1-2.
12. Lam Díaz RM. Mala conducta científica en la publicación. Rev Cuba Hematol Inmunol Hemoter. 2018;34(1):96-101.
13. Luiten JD, Verhemel A, Dahi Y, Luiten EJT, Gadjradj PS. Honorary Authorships in Surgical Literature. World J. Surg. 2018; 43:696-703.
14. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. ICMJE. Modern Medical Laboratory Journal. 2020. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/definingthe-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
15. Holcombe AO. Contributorship, not authorship: Use credit to indicate who did what. Publications. 2019;7:48.
16. ORI. The Office of Research Integrity. 28 Guidelines at a glance on avoiding plagiarism. RCR Casebook: data acquisition a management. 2019. https://ori.hhs.gov/briefoverview-conflict-interests#gl28
17. Revista Infodir C. Metodología para la implementación de la taxonomía CRediT a revistas científicas del sistema nacional de salud. INFODIR. 2020 https://revinfodir.sld.cu/index.php/infodir/article/download/969/1151
18. Espinoza DM. Consideraciones éticas en el proceso de una publicación científica. Rev. Med. Clin. Condes. 2019;30(3):226-30
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luis Manuel Abreu Pereira, Yanier Espinosa Goire , Andy Guillermo Paumier Durán (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
