Impact of food variety on food consumption in Guadalajara, Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023181Keywords:
Mexican diet, sensory satiety, obesity, ultra-processed foods, nutrition educationAbstract
Food consumption in Guadalajara has been influenced by the transformation of the traditional Mexican diet towards a food model characterised by a high availability of ultra-processed products. It was observed that the variety of the diet had an impact on caloric intake, according to the Specific Sensory Satiety Theory (SSST), which argued that individuals tended to consume more when offered a varied diet as opposed to a monotonous one. The increase in the supply of processed foods, together with their affordability and the influence of the food environment, favoured the excessive consumption of high-calorie products. The proliferation of restaurants and supermarkets and aggressive marketing increased exposure to unhealthy options, especially among children and adolescents. In turn, cultural events and local festivities promoted greater consumption of foods high in sugars and fats. Despite efforts in nutritional education, the preference for palatable foods and the accelerated pace of life reduced the intake of fruit and vegetables. As a consequence, the rates of obesity and metabolic diseases increased. To mitigate these effects, it was suggested that public policies be implemented to regulate advertising, promote access to fresh food and reinforce nutritional education in Guadalajara.
References
1. Armitage G, Hervey GR, Rolls BJ, Rowe EA, Tobin G. The effects of supplementation of the diet with highly palatable foods upon energy balance in the rat. J Physiol. 1983;342:229-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014848
2. Asociación Psiquiátrica Americana. Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales DSM-IV-TR. Barcelona: Edit. Toray Masson; 2005.
3. Barber T, Viña JR, Viña J, Cabo J. Decreased urea synthesis in cafeteria-diet-induced obesity in the rat. Biochem J. 1985;230:675-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2300675
4. Becoña E, Vázquez F, Oblitas L. Promoción de los estilos de vida saludables. Investig En Detalle [Internet]. 2004;5. Disponible en: http://www.alapsa.org/detalle/05/index.htm
5. Blundel JE. Serotonin and appetite. Neuropharmacology. 1984;22:1537-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(84)90098-4
6. Bolles RC. A functionalistic approach to feeding. En: Capaldi ED, Powley TL, editores. Taste, Experience and Feeding: Development and learning. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10075-020
7. Booth DA. Satiety and appetite are conditioned reactions. Psychosom Med. 1977;39:76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197703000-00002
8. Booth DA. Cognitive experimental psychology of appetite. En: Boakes RA, Popplewell DA, Burton MJ, editores. Eating habits: food, physiology and learned behavior. Gran Bretaña: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1987. p. 175-209.
9. Brobeck JR. Food and temperature. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1960;16:439-66.
10. Cabanac M. Physiological role of pleasure. Science. 1971;173:1103-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.4002.1103
11. Cannon WB, Washburn AL. An explanation of hunger. Am J Physiol. 1912;29:441-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1912.29.5.441
12. Capaldi ED. Hunger and conditioned flavor preferences. En: Capaldi ED, Powley TL, editores. Taste, Experience, & Feeding: Development and Learning. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 157-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10075-011
13. Capaldi ED. Conditioned food preferences. En: Capaldi ED, editor. Why we eat, What we eat. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1996. p. 53-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10291-003
14. Carlson NR. Fundamentos de Psicología Fisiológica. España: Prentice Hall; 1996.
15. Fernández AF. Tratamiento cognitivo-conductual de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria (TCA): Anorexia y bulimia nerviosas. En: Caballo VE, editor. Manual para el tratamiento cognitivo-conductual de los trastornos psicológicos. Vol. 2. México: Siglo XXI; 1998. p. 185-208.
16. Foote JA, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, Basiotis PP, Carlson A. Dietary Variety Increases the Probability of Nutrient Adequacy among Adults. J Nutr. 2004;134:1779–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.7.1779
17. Guinard JX, Brun P. Sensory-specific satiety: comparison of taste and texture effects. Appetite. 1998;31:141-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1998.0159
18. Herman CP, Polivy J. What does abnormal eating tell us about normal eating? En: Meiselman HL, MacFie HJH, editores. Food choice acceptance and consumption. Gran Bretaña: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996. p. 207-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1221-5_5
19. Hetherington MM, Rolls BJ. Sensory-Specific Satiety: Theoretical Frameworks and Central Characteristics. En: Capaldi ED, editor. Why We Eat, What We Eat: The psychology of Eating. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1996. p. 267-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10291-010
20. Hetherington MM. Sensory-Specific Satiety and its importance in meal termination. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20:113-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(95)00048-J
21. Hetherington MM, Foster R, Newman T, Anderson AS, Norton G. Understanding variety: tasting different foods delay satiation. Physiol Behav. 2006;87:263-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.012
22. Hetherington MM, Pirie LM, Nabb S. Stimulus satiation: effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite. 2002;38:19-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0442
23. Hetherington MM, Rolls BJ, Burley VJ. The time course of sensory-specific satiety. Appetite. 1989;12:57-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6663(89)90068-8
24. Johnson J, Vickers Z. Effects of flavor and macronutrient composition of food servings on liking, hunger and subsequent intake. Appetite. 1993;21:25-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1993.1034
25. Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Asuntos Sociales. II Plan Andaluz Sobre Drogas y Adicciones. España: Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social, y Dia Cash, SL; 2002-2007.
26. Kazdin AE. Modificación de la conducta y sus aplicaciones prácticas. México: Manual Moderno; 2000.
27. Kennedy GC. The role of depot fat in the hypothalamic control and hormones during growth. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1953;157:1049-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb12936.x
28. Le Magnen J. Efficacy of olfatory, tactile and other food stimuli in the acquisition and manifestation of appetite in rats. Appetite. 1999;33:43-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0260
29. López-Espinoza A. Análisis experimental de la conducta alimentaria. An Psicol. 2007;23(2):258-63.
30. Martínez AG, López-Espinoza A, Aguilera V, Galindo A, De la Torre-Ibarra C. Observación y experimentación en psicología: una revisión histórica. Diversitas. 2007;3(2):213-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2007.0002.03
31. Marván LL, Pérez LA, Palacios GB. Sistema Mexicano de Alimentos Equivalentes. México: Fomento de Nutrición y Salud, AC; 2004.
32. Mayer J. Regulation of energy intake and body weight. The glucostatic theory and the lipostatic hypothesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1955;63:15-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1955.tb36543.x
33. McCrory MA, Fuss PJ, McCallum JE, Yao M, Vinken AG, Hays NP, Roberts SB. Dietary variety within food groups: association with energy intake and body fatness in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:440-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/69.3.440
34. Meiselman HL. The contextual basis for food acceptance, food choice and food intake: the food, the situation and the individual. En: Meiselman HL, MacFie HJH, editores. Food choice acceptance and consumption. Gran Bretaña: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996. p. 239-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1221-5_6
35. Pavlov IP. Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press; 1927.
36. Pinel JPJ. Biopsicología. España: Pearson; 2007.
37. Rolls BJ. Experimental analyses of the effects of variety in a meal on human feeding. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;42:932-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/42.5.932
38. Rolls BJ, van Duijvenvoorde PM, Rolls ET. Pleasantness changes and food intake in a varied four-course meal. Appetite. 1984;5:337-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(84)80006-9
39. Rozin P. Sociocultural influences on human food selection. En: Capaldi ED, editor. Why we eat, what we eat: The psychology of eating. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1996. p. 233-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10291-009
40. Unikel SC, Caballero RA. Guía Clínica para trastornos de la Conducta Alimentaria. México: Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente; 2010.
41. Weingarten HP. Learning, homeostasis, and the control of feeding behavior. En: Capaldi ED, Powley TL, editores. Taste, Experience and Feeding: Development and learning. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 14-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10075-002
42. Young PT. The experimental analysis of appetite. Psychol Bull. 1941;38(3):129-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053492
43. Young PT. Hedonic organization and regulation of behavior. Psychol Rev. 1966;73(1):59-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022630
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Carolina De La Torre Ibarra (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
