The impact of generational differences in the work environment: bibliometric analysis and systematic review in Scopus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2023198Keywords:
generational difference, generations, work environment, bibliometrics, literature reviewAbstract
The objective of the study is to conduct a systematic bibliometric study of literature on the impact of generational differences in the work environment between 2004 and 2024. This work used bibliometrics as a methodology, which involved the observation of bibliometric indicators in Scopus (country, author, source, type of document, institutional affiliation, among others). In addition, a systematic review of the literature was carried out. The results show that between 2020 and 2024, there was a 29% increase in the amount of research on this topic. In terms of research contributions, the United States ranks first with 31.1%. In addition, with seven publications, the most prominent source was the Journal of Nursing Management, and with 698 citations Lyons was the most cited author. Likewise, articles related to the social sciences represented 22% of the total number of publications, while 92% of the documents were scientific articles. It is concluded that research on generational differences in the work environment has advanced, in terms of the breadth of topics addressed, collaboration of authors, level of international cooperation and availability of relevant data. Therefore, the bibliometric analysis and systematic review shows that, while the coexistence of diverse generations can generate tensions and challenges related to values, communication and expectations, it also offers a unique opportunity to enrich organizational dynamics. Finally, this study provides an empirical basis for a critical evaluation of the research and a foundation for future research.
References
1. Andrade L, Bolaños M, Lopez P. Liderazgo y grupos generacionales: Caso de estudio en una entidad financiera. Rev Nac Adm. 2022;13(1):e3850. https://dx.doi.org/10.22458/rna.v13i1.3850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22458/rna.v13i1.3850
2. Ávila H. Multiculturalidad e interculturalidad: el papel de la educación superior para la generación de competencias interculturales para el contexto organizacional. Educ Humanism. 2022;24(3):13-34. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.24.43.4838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.24.43.4838
3. Ayoobzadeh M, Schweitzer L, Lyons S, Ng E. A tale of two generations: a time-lag study of career expectations. Pers Rev. 2024;53(27):1649-1665. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2022-0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2022-0101
4. Baham C, Kalgotra P, Nasirpouri Shadbad F, Sharda R. Generational differences in handling technology interruptions: a qualitative study. Eur J Inf Syst. 2022;32(5):858-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2070557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2070557
5. Bernedo-Moreira D, Papanicolau J, Loayza-Apaza Y, Pacompía H, Gonzales López J. Generational diversity and labor productivity, a pressing problem in Peruvian public institutions. Salud Cienc Tecnol Conf. 2023;2(381):1-8. https://conferencias.ageditor.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023381
6. Brečko D. Intergenerational Cooperation and Stereotypes in Relation to Age in the Working Environment. Chang Soc Personal. 2021;5(1):103-125. doi:10.15826/csp.2021.5.1.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2021.5.1.124
7. Caló L. Métricas de impacto y evaluación de la ciencia. Rev Perú Med Exp Salud Pública. 2022;39(2):236-240. https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpmesp/2022.v39n2/236-240/es DOI: https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2022.392.11171
8. Campbell C, Patrician P. Generational preferences in the nursing work environment: A dimensional concept analysis. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(4):927-937. doi:10.1111/jonm.13024. PMID: 32255219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13024
9. Deschênes A-A. Satisfaction with work and person–environment fit: are there intergenerational differences? An examination through person–job, person–group and person–supervisor fit. Int J Organ Theory Behav. 2021;24(1):60-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-02-2020-0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-02-2020-0025
10. Egerová D, Komárková L, Kutlák J. Generation Y and generation Z employment expectations: A generational cohort comparative study from two countries. E+M Ekon Manag. 2021;24(3):93-109. doi:10.15240/tul/001/2021-03-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-03-006
11. Eldermire E, Heyns E, Howard H. Unsubstantiated Conclusions: A Scoping Review on Generational Differences of Leadership in Academic Libraries. Libr Fac Staff Scholar Res. 2019;45(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102054
12. Ferreira N. Positive coping skills, thriving and social connectedness: Are there generational differences in the digital workplace? Agile coping in the digital workplace: Emerging issues for research and practice. Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70228-1_5
13. Goh E, Okumus F. Avoiding the hospitality workforce bubble: Strategies to attract and retain generation Z talent in the hospitality workforce. Tour Manag Perspect. 2020;33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100603
14. Herron J, Ferris C, Gilliam A. Generational and occupational differences in human factors knowledge and awareness: a comparison study. BMJ Mil Health. 2020;168(5):372-376. doi:10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001487
15. Ho H, Yeung DY. Conflict between younger and older workers: an identity-based approach. Int J Confl Manag. 2021;32(19):102-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2019-0124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2019-0124
16. Hultman K. Building a culture of employee optimization. Organ Dev J. 2020;38(2):35-48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343615429_Building_a_Culture_of_Employee_Optimization
17. Janssen D, Carradini S. Generation Z Workplace Communication Habits and Expectations. IEEE Trans Prof Commun. 2021;64(2):137-153. doi:10.1109/TPC.2021.3069288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3069288
18. Kinger N, Kumar S. Generational differences in work values in the workplace. Folia Oeconom Stetin. 2023;23(2):204-221. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2023-0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2023-0027
19. Kolb J, Magnan E, Carethers J, Patel S. Leveraging Generational Differences in the Gastroenterology Workforce to Promote Satisfaction and a Harmonious Work Environment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22(11):2172-2176. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.08.002
20. Kutlak J. Individualism and self-reliance of Generations Y and Z and their impact on the working environment: An empirical study across 5 European countries. Probl Perspect Manag. 2021;19(1):39-52. doi:10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.04
21. Lasierra M. Diferencias generacionales en el trabajo en España. Una revisión. Rev Bras Gest Negoc. 2019;21(4):953-69. doi: 10.7819/rbgn.v21i5.4024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i5.4024
22. Leslie B, Anderson C, Bickham C, Horman J, Overly A, Gentry C, et al. Generation Z Perceptions of a Positive Workplace Environment. Employee Responsib Rights J. 2021;33(3):171-87. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09366-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09366-2
23. Leyva I, Rodríguez E, Vázquez M, Ávila E. Indicadores bibliométricos y métricas alternativas en la evaluación de la producción científica. REDINFOHOI. 2023:1-13. Disponible en: https://redinfohol.sld.cu/index.php/redinfohol/2023/paper/view/34/31
24. Llerena Paz M, Arévalo Avecillas M. Indicadores bibliométricos: origen, definición y aplicaciones científicas en el Ecuador. Espíritu Emprendedor TES. 2021;5(1):130-53. doi: 10.33970/eetes.v5.n1.2021.253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33970/eetes.v5.n1.2021.253
25. Ludviga I. Workplace Expectations Versus Reality: Are Millennials So Different? Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics. Springer; 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52294-0_3
26. Lyons ST, LeBlanc JE. Generational Identity in the Workplace: Toward Understanding and Empathy. Open J Soc Sci. 2019;11(7):270-91. doi: 10.4337/9781788113427.00022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113427.00022
27. Lyons ST, Schweitzer L, Urick MJ, Kuron L. A dynamic social-ecological model of generational identity in the workplace: Research. J Intergener Relatsh. 2018;17(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/15350770.2018.1500332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2018.1500332
28. Mahmoud AB, Fuxman L, Mohr I, Reisel WD, Grigoriou N. We aren't your reincarnation! Workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. Int J Manpow. 2021;42(1):193-209. doi: 10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448
29. Martínez-Valdez R, Catache-Mendoza M, Huerta-Cerda Z. Diferencias en la motivación laboral entre la Generación X y la Generación Y, y su impacto en las organizaciones. Vinculategica Efan. 2020;6(1):993-1003. doi: 10.29105/vtga6.1-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga6.1-648
30. Mehra P, Nickerson C. Organizational communication and job satisfaction: what role do generational differences play? Int J Organ Anal. 2019;27(3):524-47. doi: 10.1108/IJOA-12-2017-1297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2017-1297
31. Monzón-Nebot E, Álvarez-Álvarez C. Healthcare interpreters X, Y, Z: Exploring generational differences in interpreters' values and job satisfaction using self-determination theory. Transl Space. 2024;13(1):126-48. doi: 10.1075/ts.23018.mon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.23018.mon
32. Moreno Carrillo L, Toscano Moctezuma J. Gestión estratégica de los equipos de trabajo intergeneracionales en las organizaciones. Rev Torreón Univ. 2022;11(32). doi: 10.5377/rtu.v11i32.15004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5377/rtu.v11i32.15004
33. Öngel V, Günsel A, Gençer Çelik G, Altındağ E. Digital Leadership’s Influence on Individual Creativity and Employee Performance: A View through the Generational Lens. Behav Sci. 2024;14(1):3. doi: 10.3390/bs14010003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010003
34. Paros A, Kelly P, Sprinkle T. Enhancing project team outcomes despite provisional work: a discussion to leverage cross-generational advantages. Team Perform Manag. 2022;28(3/4):191-204. doi: 10.1108/TPM-08-2021-0059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-08-2021-0059
35. Pascarella L, Marulanda K, Duchesneau E, Sanchez-Casalongue M, Kapadia M, Farrell T. Preferred Feedback Styles Among Different Groups in an Academic Medical Center. J Surg Res. 2023;288:215-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.02.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.02.044
36. Pawlak N, Serafin L, Czarkowska-Paczek B. Analysis of the influence of intergenerational differences on cross-generational cooperation among nurses. Pielegniarstwo XXI Wieku. 2022;21(1):45-9. doi: 10.2478/pielxxiw-2022-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2022-0007
37. Pittman M, Jung S, Gordon S. Which came first, work-personal conflict or work environment? Extending the generational debate on cohort differences in turnover intention. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2024;36(10):3283-99. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2023-0827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2023-0827
38. Raudales-García EV, Patricia-Chinchilla L. Análisis exploratorio del desempeño laboral en tres generaciones: X, Millennials y Centennials. Yachay Rev Cien Cult. 2023;12(1):53-7. doi: 10.36881/yachay.v12i1.667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36881/yachay.v12i1.667
39. Reynoso C, Tiburcio A, Pérez G, Ortiz J, Michel P. Cultura de bienestar laboral; un reto impulsado por el liderazgo transformacional. Análisis Plural. 2023;5(2):1-15. doi: 10.31391/ap.vi5.87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31391/ap.vi5.87
40. Rojas T. Beneficios laborales y diversidad generacional: Caso de la Red de Bibliotecas de la Universidad La Salle en México. Rev Latinoam Investig Soc [Internet]. 2021 [citado 2025 Feb 19];4(2):11-27. Disponible en: https://revistasinvestigacion.lasalle.mx/index.php/relais/article/view/2759
41. Sadowski I, Zawistowska A, Muszyński M. Generational Change in Work-Related Agency Beliefs in Polan. KZfSS Kölner Z Soziol Sozialpsychol [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2025 Feb 19];76:163-85. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11577-024-00956-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-024-00956-0
42. Sánchez Acosta M, Quisimalín Santamaría H, Quinatoa Lema L, Garzón Montaguano A. Cambio generacional en empresas familiares: claves para una transición efectiva. Bol Coyunt [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2025 Feb 19];(41):20-29. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.31243/bcoyu.41.2024.2333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31243/bcoyu.41.2024.2333
43. Sanz J. Bibliometría: origen y evolución. Hosp Domic [Internet]. 2022 [citado 2025 Feb 19];6(3):105-7. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2530-51152022000300105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v6i3.168
44. Schrimpf A, Scheiwe E, Bleckwenn M. Insights from end-of-career general practitioners on changing working conditions and generational differences: considerations for future strategies. BMC Prim Care [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2025 Feb 19];25(1):171. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02419-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02419-z
45. Skýpalová R, Stojanová H, Troger H, Caha Z. Human Resource Management across Generations within the Context of World of Work 4.0. Emerg Sci J [Internet]. 2023 [citado 2025 Feb 19];7(3):843-53. Disponible en: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-013
46. Stevanin S, Voutilainen A, Bressan V, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Rosolen V, Kvist T. Nurses' Generational Differences Related to Workplace and Leadership in Two European Countries. West J Nurs Res [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2025 Feb 19];42(1):14-23. Disponible en: 10.1177/0193945919838604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919838604
47. Toro I, Labrador-Fernández J, De Nicolás V. Generational diversity in the workplace: psychological empowerment and flexibility in Spanish companies. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2019 [citado 2025 Feb 19];10(1). Disponible en: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01953
48. Trisasanti H, Dhammasaccakarn W, Rinthaisong I, Limpradit B. Intercultural communication apprehension as a mediator between generational differences and conflicts. J Behav Sci [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2025 Feb 19];15(3):66-84. Disponible en: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13013495
49. Viterouli M, Belias D, Koustelios A, Tsigilis N. Optimizing Adaptive Performance: Exploring Organizational Learning Culture across Generations. J Chin Hum Resour Manag [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2025 Feb 19];15(4):3-27. Disponible en: 10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800501.20241504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800501.20241504
50. Yadav R, Chaudhari S. Do leadership behaviour preferences differ among generations? A qualitative study of Gen X, Y, and Z in India. Asian Bus Manag [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2025 Feb 19];23:337-65. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-024-00266-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-024-00266-5
51. Zhao X, Zhang T, Choi M, Xu J. Are different generations of female employees trapped by work-family conflicts? A study on the impact of family-supportive supervisor behavior on thriving at work. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2024 [citado 2025 Feb 19];15. Disponible en: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1339899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1339899
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rafael Romero-Carazas, Victor Cornejo-Aparicio, Antony Paul Espiritu-Martinez , Jessica Karina Saavedra-Vasconez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
