Effect of dietary characteristics on food consumption in humans

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024479

Keywords:

Sensory Specific Satiety, Varied Diet, Monotonous Diet, Food Consumption, Self-Regulatory Behaviour

Abstract

The Specific Sensory Satiety Theory (SSST) has attempted to explain the mechanism of modification of self-regulatory behaviour (Hetherington & Rolls, 1996), proposing that subjects tend to consume a greater quantity of food when it has diverse sensory properties (varied diet). In contrast, subjects consume a smaller amount of food if it has similar sensory properties (monotonous diet). With regard to the effects of presenting diets with monotonous and varied sensory characteristics on humans, there are numerous studies that affirm that the availability of diverse foods is one of the factors that contribute to their overconsumption and, therefore, self-regulatory behaviours are not observed (McCrory, Fuss, McCallum, Yao, Vinken, Hays & Roberts, 1999; Rolls, 1985; Rolls, 2007). The main objective of this work was to experimentally evaluate the effect of foods with monotonous and varied sensory characteristics on food consumption in humans. To this end, three experiments were carried out: 1) Experiment 1: aimed to assess the consumption behaviour of monotonous and varied diets, presented in different sequences with intervals of approximately 23 hours between each presentation. Sixteen naïve experimental university students of both sexes, aged between 18 and 27, took part. The main results of Experiment 1 showed that the groups exposed to a single type of food presented a stable consumption. On the other hand, in the groups exposed to monotonous and varied foods, it was observed that the variety influenced the increase in consumption by the participants; Experiment 2: aimed to evaluate the effect of exposing the participants to monotonous or varied diets presented in different sequences with intervals of approximately 23 hours between each presentation. Sixteen naïve experimental university students of both sexes, aged between 18 and 27, took part; the main results showed that the groups exposed to the varied diet selected and consumed a greater quantity of food in comparison with the groups exposed to the monotonous diet, regardless of whether the food was provided simultaneously or successively. On the other hand, it was observed that the group exposed to monotonous foods simultaneously selected and consumed more foods than the group exposed to foods successively, while the group exposed to varied foods successively selected and consumed a greater quantity of foods in comparison to the group exposed to varied foods simultaneously. and, 3) Experiment 3: Experiment 2 was replicated with the following objectives: a) To evaluate the effects of exposing participants to monotonous or varied diets, simultaneously or successively, on consumption behaviour; and b) To identify the differences and/or similarities between the effects on the resulting behavioural parameters and the effects on the behavioural parameters observed in Experiment 2. Sixteen naïve experimental university students of both sexes, aged between 18 and 27, took part; the main results showed that the groups exposed to varied foods selected and consumed a greater quantity of food compared to the groups exposed to monotonous foods, regardless of whether the foods were provided simultaneously or successively. On the other hand, it was observed that the group exposed to monotonous foods simultaneously selected and consumed more portions than the group exposed to foods successively, while the group exposed to varied foods successively selected and consumed a greater number of portions compared to the group exposed to varied foods simultaneously.

 

References

1. Armitage G, Hervey GR, Rolls BJ, Rowe EA, Tobin G. The effects of supplementation of the diet with highly palatable foods upon energy balance in the rat. J Physiol. 1983;342:229-51.

2. Asociación Psiquiátrica Americana. Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales DSM-IV-TR. Barcelona: Edit. Toray Masson; 2005.

3. Barber T, Viña JR, Viña J, Cabo J. Decreased urea synthesis in cafeteria-diet-induced obesity in the rat. Biochem J. 1985;230:675-81.

4. Becoña E, Vázquez F, Oblitas L. Promoción de los estilos de vida saludables. Investig En Detalle [Internet]. 2004;5. Disponible en: http://www.alapsa.org/detalle/05/index.htm

5. Blundel JE. Serotonin and appetite. Neuropharmacology. 1984;22:1537-51.

6. Bolles RC. A functionalistic approach to feeding. En: Capaldi ED, Powley TL, editores. Taste, Experience and Feeding: Development and learning. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 3-13.

7. Booth DA. Satiety and appetite are conditioned reactions. Psychosom Med. 1977;39:76-81.

8. Booth DA. Cognitive experimental psychology of appetite. En: Boakes RA, Popplewell DA, Burton MJ, editores. Eating habits: food, physiology and learned behavior. Gran Bretaña: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1987. p. 175-209.

9. Brobeck JR. Food and temperature. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1960;16:439-66.

10. Cabanac M. Physiological role of pleasure. Science. 1971;173:1103-7.

11. Cannon WB, Washburn AL. An explanation of hunger. Am J Physiol. 1912;29:441-54.

12. Capaldi ED. Hunger and conditioned flavor preferences. En: Capaldi ED, Powley TL, editores. Taste, Experience, & Feeding: Development and Learning. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 157-69.

13. Capaldi ED. Conditioned food preferences. En: Capaldi ED, editor. Why we eat, What we eat. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1996. p. 53-80.

14. Carlson NR. Fundamentos de Psicología Fisiológica. España: Prentice Hall; 1996.

15. Fernández AF. Tratamiento cognitivo-conductual de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria (TCA): Anorexia y bulimia nerviosas. En: Caballo VE, editor. Manual para el tratamiento cognitivo-conductual de los trastornos psicológicos. Vol. 2. México: Siglo XXI; 1998. p. 185-208.

16. Foote JA, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, Basiotis PP, Carlson A. Dietary Variety Increases the Probability of Nutrient Adequacy among Adults. J Nutr. 2004;134:1779–85.

17. Guinard JX, Brun P. Sensory-specific satiety: comparison of taste and texture effects. Appetite. 1998;31:141-57.

18. Herman CP, Polivy J. What does abnormal eating tell us about normal eating? En: Meiselman HL, MacFie HJH, editores. Food choice acceptance and consumption. Gran Bretaña: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996. p. 207-38.

19. Hetherington MM, Rolls BJ. Sensory-Specific Satiety: Theoretical Frameworks and Central Characteristics. En: Capaldi ED, editor. Why We Eat, What We Eat: The psychology of Eating. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1996. p. 267-90.

20. Hetherington MM. Sensory-Specific Satiety and its importance in meal termination. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20:113-7.

21. Hetherington MM, Foster R, Newman T, Anderson AS, Norton G. Understanding variety: tasting different foods delay satiation. Physiol Behav. 2006;87:263-71.

22. Hetherington MM, Pirie LM, Nabb S. Stimulus satiation: effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite. 2002;38:19-28.

23. Hetherington MM, Rolls BJ, Burley VJ. The time course of sensory-specific satiety. Appetite. 1989;12:57-68.

24. Johnson J, Vickers Z. Effects of flavor and macronutrient composition of food servings on liking, hunger and subsequent intake. Appetite. 1993;21:25-39.

25. Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Asuntos Sociales. II Plan Andaluz Sobre Drogas y Adicciones. España: Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social, y Dia Cash, SL; 2002-2007.

26. Kazdin AE. Modificación de la conducta y sus aplicaciones prácticas. México: Manual Moderno; 2000.

27. Kennedy GC. The role of depot fat in the hypothalamic control and hormones during growth. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1953;157:1049-60.

28. Le Magnen J. Efficacy of olfatory, tactile and other food stimuli in the acquisition and manifestation of appetite in rats. Appetite. 1999;33:43-51.

29. López-Espinoza A. Análisis experimental de la conducta alimentaria. An Psicol. 2007;23(2):258-63.

30. Martínez AG, López-Espinoza A, Aguilera V, Galindo A, De la Torre-Ibarra C. Observación y experimentación en psicología: una revisión histórica. Diversitas. 2007;3(2):213-25.

31. Marván LL, Pérez LA, Palacios GB. Sistema Mexicano de Alimentos Equivalentes. México: Fomento de Nutrición y Salud, AC; 2004.

32. Mayer J. Regulation of energy intake and body weight. The glucostatic theory and the lipostatic hypothesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1955;63:15-43.

33. McCrory MA, Fuss PJ, McCallum JE, Yao M, Vinken AG, Hays NP, Roberts SB. Dietary variety within food groups: association with energy intake and body fatness in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:440-7.

34. Meiselman HL. The contextual basis for food acceptance, food choice and food intake: the food, the situation and the individual. En: Meiselman HL, MacFie HJH, editores. Food choice acceptance and consumption. Gran Bretaña: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996. p. 239-63.

35. Pavlov IP. Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press; 1927.

36. Pinel JPJ. Biopsicología. España: Pearson; 2007.

37. Rolls BJ. Experimental analyses of the effects of variety in a meal on human feeding. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;42:932-9.

38. Rolls BJ, van Duijvenvoorde PM, Rolls ET. Pleasantness changes and food intake in a varied four-course meal. Appetite. 1984;5:337-48.

39. Rozin P. Sociocultural influences on human food selection. En: Capaldi ED, editor. Why we eat, what we eat: The psychology of eating. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1996. p. 233-63.

40. Unikel SC, Caballero RA. Guía Clínica para trastornos de la Conducta Alimentaria. México: Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente; 2010.

41. Weingarten HP. Learning, homeostasis, and the control of feeding behavior. En: Capaldi ED, Powley TL, editores. Taste, Experience and Feeding: Development and learning. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 14-27.

42. Young PT. The experimental analysis of appetite. Psychol Bull. 1941;38(3):129-64.

43. Young PT. Hedonic organization and regulation of behavior. Psychol Rev. 1966;73(1):59-86.

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
De La Torre Ibarra C. Effect of dietary characteristics on food consumption in humans. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Jul. 5];3:479. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/479