Impact of Personalized Healthcare Messaging on Patient Outcomes and Medical Communication Effectiveness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024496

Keywords:

Personalized Healthcare Messaging, AI-driven Medical Communication, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning in Healthcare, Electronic Health Records (EHR) Integration

Abstract

Involving patients, ensuring they follow their therapy, and enhancing their overall health all depend on effective communication in healthcare. Sending broad messages and notes seldom is one of the traditional medical communication techniques that always appeal to patients. Fewer of them follow their medication regimens, fewer of them react, and more of them have to return to the hospital as result. The research investigates how tailored healthcare message motivated by artificial intelligence affects It generates health messages unique to every patient by aggregating Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML), and Electronic Health Records (EHR). Using a 500-person sample divided in two, the proposed approach was tested: 250 persons utilised regular means of communication while 250 others received tailored messages from artificial intelligence. The personalised message group had notably higher responses rates (82.5% vs. 55.3%), drug adherence (89.4% vs. 67.8%), and patient contentment (8.9 vs. 6.7 out of 10). Furthermore declining from 21.4% (standard) to 12.3% (personalised) and from 18.5% to 8.2% were hospital readmissions and missed appointments. These findings indicate that tailored healthcare messaging driven by artificial intelligence greatly increase patient engagement, enable adherence to their treatment plan, and save healthcare expenditures. The paper also covers moral concerns, data security difficulties, and system capacity for expansion. It underlines the importance of striking a balance in healthcare communication between artificial intelligence and human control. The findings reveal that messaging systems driven by artificial intelligence and natural language processing might transform the way modern healthcare is provided, therefore opening a more adaptable and patient-centered communication channel.

References

Salciccioli, J.D.; Marshall, D.C.; Goodall, R.; Crowley, C.; Shalhoub, J.; Patel, P.; Molyneaux, P.L. Interstitial lung disease incidence and mortality in the UK and the European Union: An observational study, 2001–2017. ERJ Open Res. 2022, 8, 00058-2022.

Soriano, J.B.; Kendrick, P.J.; Paulson, K.R.; Gupta, V.; Abrams, E.M.; Adedoyin, R.A.; Adhikari, T.B.; Advani, S.M.; Agrawal, A.; Ahmadian, E. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 585–596.

Yoon, P.W.; Bastian, B.; Anderson, R.N.; Collins, J.L.; Jaffe, H.W. Potentially preventable deaths from the five leading causes of death—United States, 2008–2010. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2014, 63, 369.

Xie, M.; Liu, X.; Cao, X.; Guo, M.; Li, X. Trends in prevalence and incidence of chronic respiratory diseases from 1990 to 2017. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 49.

Gillett, K.; Lippiett, K.; Astles, C.; Longstaff, J.; Orlando, R.; Lin, S.; Powell, A.; Roberts, C.; Chauhan, A.; Thomas, M. Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: An evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2016, 3, e000145.

Nyberg, S.T.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Pentti, J.; Madsen, I.E.; Sabia, S.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Goldberg, M. Association of healthy lifestyle with years lived without major chronic diseases. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 760–768.

Hill, K.; Vogiatzis, I.; Burtin, C. The importance of components of pulmonary rehabilitation, other than exercise training, in COPD. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2013, 22, 405–413.

Spruit, M.A.; Burtin, C.; De Boever, P.; Langer, D.; Vogiatzis, I.; Wouters, E.F.; Franssen, F.M. COPD and exercise: Does it make a difference? Breathe 2016, 12, e38–e49.

Trant, A.A.; Szekely, B.; Mougalian, S.S.; DiGiovanna, M.P.; Sanft, T.; Hofstatter, E.; Silber, A.; Adelson, K.B.; Chagpar, A.; Killelea, B. The impact of communication style on patient satisfaction. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 176, 349–356.

Binita Panda. (2015). Efficacy of Training in Human Capital Development: The Case of Utkal University. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(1), 13 - 25.

Adil, M. Risk communication in healthcare: An overview. J. Commun. Healthc. 2008, 1, 363–372.

Chichirez, C.; Purcărea, V. Interpersonal communication in healthcare. J. Med. Life 2018, 11, 119.

Fusch, P.I.; Ness, L.R. Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. Qual. Rep. 2015, 20, 1408–1416.

Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Thematic Analysis; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.

Tulsky, J.A.; Beach, M.C.; Butow, P.N.; Hickman, S.E.; Mack, J.W.; Morrison, R.S.; Street, R.L.; Sudore, R.L.; White, D.B.; Pollak, K.I. A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern. Med. 2017, 177, 1361–1366.

Constand, M.K.; MacDermid, J.C.; Dal Bello-Haas, V.; Law, M. Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014, 14, 1–9.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Mohanty AK, Balaji B, Dev S, Sharma S, Dawar S, Agarwal V. Impact of Personalized Healthcare Messaging on Patient Outcomes and Medical Communication Effectiveness. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Jul. 5];3:496. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/496