Ethical and Legal Challenges in the Use of Robotics for Critical Surgical Interventions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024501

Keywords:

Robotic Surgery, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Surgical Ethics, Legal Accountability, Patient Autonomy, Medical Robotics

Abstract

Many significant operations now use robots, which has transformed contemporary medicine by enabling quicker, less intrusive therapies for patients that are more exact. Robotic-assisted surgical systems—powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)—have generated societal and legal questions as well as fresh avenues for medical outcome improvement. Privacy threats, judgements made by artificial intelligence, patient liberty, who is accountable for medical blunders, and equitable access to robotic surgical technology are among the most pressing concerns of individuals. It becomes more difficult to determine who is liable as the legislation evolves, particularly in cases where AI faults or failures lead to surgical blunders. Using artificial intelligence to perform real-time surgical decisions raises ethical questions about the requirement of human direction, the reality that machine learning systems could be biassed, and Robotic systems are also rather costly, hence they can only be employed in facilities with means to do so. This creates less equitable access to contemporary medical procedures. This article addresses these concerns by examining the new technology, risk-reducing tactics, legal frameworks, and policy recommendations required to guarantee moral and ethical use of robotically assisted surgical procedures. The research reveals that physicians must be extremely well educated, artificial intelligence must be very clear, and laws all around must be united if we want to make robotic surgery safer, more successful, and more accessible for more people. Strict legal employment criteria, clear ethical standards, and equitable healthcare procedures will direct future advancement in AI-driven robotic surgery to the highest degrees of patient safety and medical innovation. 

References

Pucchio, A.; Rathagirishnan, R.; Caton, N.; Gariscsak, P.J.; Del Papa, J.; Nabhen, J.J.; Vov, V.; Lee, W.; Moraes, F.Y. Exploration of exposure to artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: A Canadian cross-sectional mixed-methods study. BMC Med. Educ. 2022, 22, 815.

Liu, P.R.; Lu, L.; Zhang, J.Y.; Huo, T.T.; Liu, S.X.; Ye, Z.W. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Overview. Curr. Med. Sci. 2021, 41, 1105–1115.

Masters, K. Artificial intelligence in medical education. Med. Teach. 2019, 41, 976–980.

Jyoti Prakash Rath, Maheshwar Sahu. (2014). Promotion of Health Insurance Services for Financing Health Care Expenditure in Odisha. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(2), 1 - 6.

Pakkasjärvi, N.; Krishnan, N.; Ripatti, L.; Anand, S. Learning Curves in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6935.

Winkler-Schwartz, A.; Bissonnette, V.; Mirchi, N.; Ponnudurai, N.; Yilmaz, R.; Ledwos, N.; Siyar, S.; Azarnoush, H.; Karlik, B.; Del Maestro, R.F. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Best Practices Using Machine Learning to Assess Surgical Expertise in Virtual Reality Simulation. J. Surg. Educ. 2019, 76, 1681–1690.

Seil, R.; Hoeltgen, C.; Thomazeau, H.; Anetzberger, H.; Becker, R. Surgical simulation training should become a mandatory part of orthopaedic education. J. Exp. Orthop. 2022, 9, 22.

Moglia, A.; Morelli, L.; D’Ischia, R.; Fatucchi, L.M.; Pucci, V.; Berchiolli, R.; Ferrari, M.; Cuschieri, A. Ensemble deep learning for the prediction of proficiency at a virtual simulator for robot-assisted surgery. Surg. Endosc. 2022, 36, 6473–6479. [PubMed]

Secinaro, S.; Calandra, D.; Secinaro, A.; Muthurangu, V.; Biancone, P. The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A structured literature review. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2021, 21, 125.

Arora, V.M. Harnessing the Power of Big Data to Improve Graduate Medical Education: Big Idea or Bust? Acad. Med. 2018, 93, 833–834.

Yang, Z.; Talha, M. A Coordinated and Optimized Mechanism of Artificial Intelligence for Student Management by College Counselors Based on Big Data. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021, 2021, 1725490.

Schwalbe, N.; Wahl, B. Artificial intelligence and the future of global health. Lancet 2020, 395, 1579–1586.

Jackson, J.W. Enhancing self-efficacy and learning performance. J. Exp. Educ. 2002,

Milne-Ives, M.; de Cock, C.; Lim, E.; Shehadeh, M.H.; de Pennington, N.; Mole, G.; Normando, E.; Meinert, E. The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e20346.

Tanaka, H.; Nakamura, S. The Acceptability of Virtual Characters as Social Skills Trainers: Usability Study. JMIR Hum. Factors 2022, 9, e35358.

Shorey, S.; Ang, E.; Yap, J.; Ng, E.D.; Lau, S.T.; Chui, C.K. A Virtual Counseling Application Using Artificial Intelligence for Communication Skills Training in Nursing Education: Development Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e14658.

Antel, R.; Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, S.; Guadagno, E.; Harley, J.M.; Poenaru, D. The use of artificial intelligence and virtual reality in doctor-patient risk communication: A scoping review. Patient Educ. Couns. 2022, 105, 3038–3050.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Vashisht N, Goyal W, Choudhary S, Jayakumar SS, Patil S, Mohapatra CK, et al. Ethical and Legal Challenges in the Use of Robotics for Critical Surgical Interventions. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Jul. 5];3:501. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/501