Leveraging AI-Driven Health Informatics for Predictive Analytics in Chronic Disease Management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024507

Keywords:

AI-driven health informatics, predictive analytics, chronic disease management, machine learning, personalized treatment

Abstract

People are getting long-term illnesses like diabetes, heart disease, and high blood pressure more and more often. Because of this, it's even more important to find better ways to handle these situations and move quickly when they happen.  Using AI-powered health informatics in predictive analytics seems like a good way to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes when dealing with long-term illnesses.  This study looks at how AI models, like machine learning algorithms, predictive modelling, and data-driven analytics, can change how long-term illnesses are watched, identified, and treated.  By looking at a lot of data from smart tech, medical pictures, and electronic health records (EHRs), AI systems can find patterns and guess how a disease will get worse before the symptoms show up.  By finding high-risk patients early on, these insights can help healthcare workers make the best use of resources, give more personalised care, and cut costs. Using AI in health technology also makes it easier to make systems that can keep an eye on people with long-term illnesses in real time. These systems can keep an eye on vital signs, living factors, and drug compliance all the time.  This can help people get help right away, which can cut down on problems and hospital stays.  AI technologies can also help automate repetitive chores like data filing, medical support, and decision-making, which frees up healthcare workers to spend more time caring for patients directly.  However, using AI to handle chronic diseases can be hard because of issues with data protection, the need for uniform data forms, and making sure that AI models can be understood and held accountable.  At the end of the paper, the future uses of AI in managing chronic diseases are talked about. It is emphasized that healthcare workers, data scientists, and lawmakers need to keep researching and working together to get the most out of AI-driven health informatics.

References

Dave, M.; Patel, N. Artificial intelligence in healthcare and education. Br. Dent. J. 2023, 234, 761–764.

Brambilla, A.; Sun, T.-Z.; Elshazly, W.; Ghazy, A.; Barach, P.; Lindahl, G.; Capolongo, S. Flexibility during the COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Healthcare Facility Assessment Tools for Resilient Evaluation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11478.

Prakash, S.; Balaji, J.N.; Joshi, A.; Surapaneni, K.M. Ethical Conundrums in the Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare-A Scoping Review of Reviews. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1914.

Cacciamani, G.E.; Chu, T.N.; Sanford, D.I.; Abreu, A.; Duddalwar, V.; Oberai, A.; Kuo, C.-C.J.; Liu, X.; Denniston, A.K.; Vasey, B.; et al. PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcare. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 14–15.

Pisapia, A.; Banfi, G.; Tomaiuolo, R. The novelties of the regulation on health technology assessment, a key achievement for the European union health policies. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. CCLM 2022, 60, 1160–1163.

Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Lassi, N.; Zhang, X. Privacy Protection in Using Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare: Chinese Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1878.

Townsend, B.A.; Sihlahla, I.; Naidoo, M.; Naidoo, S.; Donnelly, D.-L.; Thaldar, D.W. Mapping the regulatory landscape of AI in healthcare in Africa. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1214422.

Marengo, A.; Pagano, A. Investigating the Factors Influencing the Adoption of Blockchain Technology across Different Countries and Industries: A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics 2023, 12, 3006.

Moldt, J.-A.; Festl-Wietek, T.; Madany Mamlouk, A.; Nieselt, K.; Fuhl, W.; Herrmann-Werner, A. Chatbots for future docs: Exploring medical students’ attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence and medical chatbots. Med. Educ. Online 2023, 28, 2182659.

Bartels, R.; Dudink, J.; Haitjema, S.; Oberski, D.; van ‘t Veen, A. A Perspective on a Quality Management System for AI/ML-Based Clinical Decision Support in Hospital Care. Front. Digit. Health 2022, 4, 942588.

Shams, R.A.; Zowghi, D.; Bano, M. AI and the quest for diversity and inclusion: A systematic literature review. AI Ethics 2023.

Feng, J.; Phillips, R.V.; Malenica, I.; Bishara, A.; Hubbard, A.E.; Celi, L.A.; Pirracchio, R. Clinical artificial intelligence quality improvement: Towards continual monitoring and updating of AI algorithms in healthcare. npj Digit. Med. 2022, 5, 66.

Boonstra, A.; Laven, M. Influence of artificial intelligence on the work design of emergency department clinicians a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2022, 22, 669.

Moitreyee Paul, Purnachandra Saha. (2015). Workplace Spirituality–The Essence of Modern Business Organizations. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(3), 50 - 56.

Hogg, H.D.J.; Al-Zubaidy, M.; Talks, J.; Denniston, A.K.; Kelly, C.J.; Malawana, J.; Papoutsi, C.; Teare, M.D.; Keane, P.A.; Beyer, F.R.; et al. Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, 39742.

Miller, G.J. Stakeholder roles in artificial intelligence projects. Proj. Leadersh. Soc. 2022, 3, 100068.

Kordi, M.; Dehghan, M.J.; Shayesteh, A.A.; Azizi, A. The impact of artificial intelligence algorithms on management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review. Inform. Med. Unlocked 2022, 29, 100891.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Sharma P, verma V vrat, Mane M, Patil S, Samal A, Sruthi M, et al. Leveraging AI-Driven Health Informatics for Predictive Analytics in Chronic Disease Management. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 May 6];3:507. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/507