Machine Learning Applications in Medical Information Science for Automated Diagnosis and Treatment Plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024515Keywords:
Machine Learning, Medical Information Science, Automated Diagnosis, Personalized Treatment Plans, Disease Prediction, Decision Support SystemsAbstract
Machine learning (ML) simplifies diagnostic and treatment planning automation in medical computer science. This is profoundly altering the healthcare industry. Thanks to rapid development in machine learning algorithms and their capacity to evaluate large, complicated information, medical decision-making has become far more accurate and simplified. By searching for trends in patient data including medical records, diagnostic images, and genetic information that might not be clear-cut for human specialists, machine learning models might assist clinic-based clinicians in These models not only enable doctors to identify issues early on but also enable them to create tailored treatment strategies for every patient's requirement. In managing repetitious tasks, forecasting how illnesses would worsen, and recommending therapies, ML techniques like supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and deep learning have also demonstrated astonishing outcomes. Dealing with chronic illnesses, cancer, and emergency care scenarios calls specifically for these abilities. Furthermore improving decision support systems driven by ML helps to reduce medical errors and maximise the resources of healthcare systems. Including machine learning models into medical information systems might help to improve patient outcomes, simplify tasks, and reduce costs as healthcare keeps becoming digital. However, societal issues, data security, and the necessity of legal structures have to be considered to guarantee that ML technologies are applied responsibly in the medical field.
References
Li, J.P.; Haq, A.U.; Din, S.U.; Khan, J.; Khan, A.; Saboor, A. Heart Disease Identification Method Using Machine Learning Classification in E-Healthcare. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 107562–107582.
Leite, A.F.; Vasconcelos, K.d.F.; Willems, H.; Jacobs, R. Radiomics and machine learning in oral healthcare. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2020, 14, 1900040.
Esteva, A.; Robicquet, A.; Ramsundar, B.; Kuleshov, V.; DePristo, M.; Chou, K.; Cui, C.; Corrado, G.; Thrun, S.; Dean, J. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 24–29.
Feurer, M.; Klein, A.; Eggensperger, K.; Springenberg, J.; Blum, M.; Hutter, F. Efficient and robust automated machine learning. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada, 7–12 December 2015; pp. 2962–2970.
Hutter, F.; Kotthoff, L.; Vanschoren, J. Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019.
Yao, Q.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.; Dai, W.; Li, Y.F.; Tu, W.W.; Yang, Q.; Yu, Y. Taking human out of learning applications: A survey on automated machine learning. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1810.13306.
Waring, J.; Lindvall, C.; Umeton, R. Automated machine learning: Review of the state-of-the-art and opportunities for healthcare. Artif. Intell. Med. 2020, 104, 101822.
Ooms, R.; Spruit, M. Self-Service Data Science in Healthcare with Automated Machine Learning. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2992.
Borkowski, A.A.; Wilson, C.P.; Borkowski, S.A.; Thomas, L.B.; Deland, L.A.; Grewe, S.J.; Mastorides, S.M. Google Auto ML versus Apple Create ML for Histopathologic Cancer Diagnosis; Which Algorithms Are Better? arXiv 2019, arXiv:1903.08057.
Tsamardinos, I.; Charonyktakis, P.; Lakiotaki, K.; Borboudakis, G.; Zenklusen, J.C.; Juhl, H.; Chatzaki, E.; Lagani, V. Just Add Data: Automated Predictive Modeling and BioSignature Discovery. bioRxiv 2020.
Karaglani, M.; Gourlia, K.; Tsamardinos, I.; Chatzaki, E. Accurate Blood-Based Diagnostic Biosignatures for Alzheimer’s Disease via Automated Machine Learning. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3016.
M.V.S.Sudhakar. (2015). A study on extent of impact shown by the occupational stressors on various types of consequences among call center agents. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(4), 49 - 55.
Gehrmann, S.; Dernoncourt, F.; Li, Y.; Carlson, E.T.; Wu, J.T.; Welt, J.; Foote, J., Jr.; Moseley, E.T.; Grant, D.W.; Tyler, P.D. Comparing rule-based and deep learning models for patient phenotyping. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1703.08705.
Nigam, P. Applying Deep Learning to ICD-9 Multi-Label Classification from Medical Records; Technical Report; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2016.
Venkataraman, G.R.; Pineda, A.L.; Bear Don’t Walk IV, O.J.; Zehnder, A.M.; Ayyar, S.; Page, R.L.; Bustamante, C.D.; Rivas, M.A. FasTag: Automatic text classification of unstructured medical narratives. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234647.
Yogarajan, V.; Montiel, J.; Smith, T.; Pfahringer, B. Seeing The Whole Patient: Using Multi-Label Medical Text Classification Techniques to Enhance Predictions of Medical Codes. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.00430.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohan Garg, Prabhjot Kaur, Joginder, Manashree Mane, Kunal Meher, Tapasmini Sahoo, Vundela Swathi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
