Innovation in teaching citizenship: The impact of Design Thinking in the classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024644Keywords:
Education for citizenship, Design Thinking, active methodologies, participatory teaching, meaningful learningAbstract
Introduction: Citizenship Education (CE) was established as a key component in the formation of critical citizens committed to society. Over time, it was observed that its traditional teaching, based on memorization and transmission of theoretical knowledge, failed to generate a real connection with the daily life of students. In response to this problem, Design Thinking (DT) emerged as an innovative methodology that promoted active participation and critical thinking in learning.
Development: The research analyzed the application of Design Thinking in the teaching of CE, highlighting its ability to improve students' motivation and understanding. It was identified that this methodology allowed students to detect real problems, formulate creative solutions and work collaboratively in their implementation. In addition, DT strengthened essential skills such as empathy, decision making and autonomous learning. It was shown that its use in the classroom encouraged reflection and the practice of citizenship values, overcoming the limitations of traditional approaches.
Conclusions: The findings confirmed that Design Thinking enhanced CE teaching by making it more interactive and relevant. However, its implementation required teacher training and curricular adjustments. It was concluded that this methodology not only improved students' learning, but also fostered their participation in democratic and social life, strengthening their role as active citizens.
References
1. Design for Change. (2013). Disponible en: [https://dfcworld.org/SITE/Toolkit](https://dfcworld.org/SITE/Toolkit)
2. Barbosa-Quintero GM, Estupiñán-Ortiz BL. La metodología activa Design Thinking para mejorar y transformar los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Ibero-Am J Educ Soc Res. 2023;3(1):1. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.600](https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.600)
3. Caiza DTC, Silva CDV, Diaz CJA, Catagña MPL, Cantuña JPL. El Design Thinking Como Método Activo En El Proceso De Enseñanza-Aprendizaje. Estud Perspect Rev Cient Acad. 2024;4(2):2. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.61384/r.c.a..v4i2.225](https://doi.org/10.61384/r.c.a..v4i2.225)
4. Chafla Piray RV. El impacto de las metodologías activas en el aprendizaje significativo de Estudios Sociales en la U.E. Tomás Oleas [Tesis de maestría]. Riobamba, Ecuador: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024. Disponible en: [http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/13783](http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/13783)
5. Dorland A. Designing our Thinking: Examining the Effects of Experiential Learning and Design Thinking on Creativity, Innovation, and Collaboration Skills Development in the Undergraduate Classroom. Can J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2024;15(1). Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.1.14235](https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.1.14235)
6. García DA. Design for change para la enseñanza de la Historia. mSchools. 3 de marzo de 2022. Disponible en: [https://mschools.com/es/design-for-change-para-ensenanza-historia/](https://mschools.com/es/design-for-change-para-ensenanza-historia/)
7. Guaita Oña JE. Las metodologías activas en el desarrollo del aprendizaje de los estudiantes [Tesis de maestría]. Quito, Ecuador: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador; 2024. Disponible en: [http://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/handle/10644/9912](http://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/handle/10644/9912)
8. Hernández-Gil C, Núñez-López JA. Design thinking aplicado al mejoramiento de las competencias ciudadanas en universitarios: Voto popular. Rev Investig Desarr Innov. 2020;11(1):85-98. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n1.2020.11685](https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n1.2020.11685)
9. Hervis EE. La educación en América Latina: Desarrollo y perspectivas. Act Investig Educ. 2017;17(2):355-77.
10. IDEO Design Thinking. IDEO | Design Thinking. 2018. Disponible en: [https://designthinking.ideo.com](https://designthinking.ideo.com)
11. Izquierdo MI, Calero CG, Lázaro DG. DESIGN THINKING, UNA METODOLOGÍA PARA FOMENTAR EL APRENDIZAJE SIGNIFICATIVO. Rev Ing Ind. 2022;21. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.22320/S07179103/2022.01](https://doi.org/10.22320/S07179103/2022.01)
12. Lake D, Guo W, Chen E, McLaughlin J. Design Thinking in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges for Decolonized Learning. Teach Learn Inq. 2024;12. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.4](https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.4)
13. LOPC. (2011).
14. Mejía Zarazúa H. Ciudadanía Y Educación. Xihmai. 2006;1(1):9.
15. Moreira JA, Zambrano Montes LC, Rodríguez Gámez M. El modelo Design Thinking como estrategia pedagógica en la enseñanza-aprendizaje en la educación superior. Polo Conocim Rev Cient Prof. 2021;6(3):1062-74.
16. Ñontol LM, Montenegro Marín MR, Ruíz Acuña HM, Fernández Otoya FA. El design thinking como metodología para desarrollar el aprendizaje autónomo en estudiantes de escuelas peruanas. Rev San Gregorio. 2022;1(51):209-30. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v0i51.2045](https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v0i51.2045)
17. Objetivo 4: Educación de calidad | Programa De Las Naciones Unidas Para El Desarrollo. UNDP. 2015. Disponible en: [https://www.undp.org/es/sustainable-development-goals/educacion-calidad](https://www.undp.org/es/sustainable-development-goals/educacion-calidad)
18. Oviedo HC, Campo-Arias A. Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2005;34(4):572-80.
19. Páez Álvarez A. La participación ciudadana y su relación con el acceso a la información pública. Ra Ximhai. 2006;2(3):611-40. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.02.03.2006.04.ap](https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.02.03.2006.04.ap)
20. Ramírez SVA. Pedagogical Strategy Based on the Application of Design Thinking Techniques for the Teaching-Learning Process of Research Methodologies in Psychology Students of the Technical Corporation for Human, Social and Cultural Development of Colombia- CORPODESC, 2023. Int J Soc Sci Hum Res. 2023;6(12). Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i12-71](https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i12-71)
21. RGLOEI. (2023).
22. Sánchez M, Aguilar Trujillo D, Cebrián Robles D, Gallego Arrufat MJ, García Peralta A, Jiménez Ocaña M, et al. #DIenlínea UNIA: Guía para una docencia innovadora en red. Universidad Internacional de Andalucía. 2021. Disponible en: [https://doi.org/10.56451/10334/5981](https://doi.org/10.56451/10334/5981)
23. Schmidt-Behlau B. Estado del arte de la Educación para la ciudadanía y Educación ciudadana mundial en Colombia, Perú y Ecuador. DVV International. 2021. Disponible en: [https://www.dvv-international.org.ec/noticias/detail/estado-del-arte-de-la-educacion-para-la-ciudadania-y-educacion-ciudadana-mundial-en-colombia-peru-y-ecuador](https://www.dvv-international.org.ec/noticias/detail/estado-del-arte-de-la-educacion-para-la-ciudadania-y-educacion-ciudadana-mundial-en-colombia-peru-y-ecuador)
24. Torres EKB. Educación y desarrollo social. Horiz Cienc. 2018;8(14):113-21.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adriana Elizabeth Asanza Romero , Joffre Vicente Quinteros Kohlhauser, Yilena Montero Reyes , Iliana Verónica Bastidas Cazares , Joanna Maricela Gallardo Solís (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
