The impact of pedagogical support on improving teaching practice: a systematic review.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025431Keywords:
Environmental education, Ecological awareness, Sustainability education, Experiential pedagogy, Family and environment, Nature-based learningAbstract
Introduction: in the context of educational reforms and the ongoing pursuit of improved teaching quality, pedagogical accompaniment has emerged as a key strategy to strengthen teacher performance. Its implementation has spread across various educational institutions, but the results vary depending on the approach, the training of the mentors, and the institutional culture.
Objective: to systematically analyze the impact of pedagogical accompaniment on the improvement of teaching practices, considering studies published between 2021 and 2025.
Methods: a systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA protocol. Renowned scientific databases such as Scopus and Web of Science were consulted. A total of 568 documents were identified, of which 86 met the inclusion criteria. The review focused on empirical studies with qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches that addressed the relationship between pedagogical accompaniment and teaching improvement.
Results: the reviewed studies reveal that pedagogical accompaniment fosters reflection on practice, improves methodological strategies, promotes classroom innovation, and strengthens teachers' professional development. Factors influencing its effectiveness were also identified, such as the quality of feedback, mentor training, time allocated to the process, and the willingness of the accompanied teacher.
Conclusion: pedagogical accompaniment is an effective tool for improving teaching practice, if it is guided by principles of collaboration, contextualization, and continuous improvement. Its implementation must be supported by clear policies, adequate resources, and a formative approach focused on professional teacher growth.
References
1. Iqbal J, Asgarova V, Hashmi ZF, Ngajie BN, Asghar MZ, Järvenoja H. Exploring faculty experiences with generative artificial intelligence tools integration in second language curricula in Chinese higher education. Discov Comput [Internet]. 2025 Jun 19; 28(1):128. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10791-025-09655-6
2. Al-Kamzari F, Alias N. A systematic literature review of project-based learning in secondary school physics: theoretical foundations, design principles, and implementation strategies. Humanit Soc Sci Commun [Internet]. 2025 Mar 1; 12(1):286. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04579-4
3. Yang Y, Jirawit Y. Navigating HSK level 5 challenges: dual perspectives from Thai undergraduates and Chinese lecturers. Lang Test Asia [Internet]. 2025 Apr 11; 15(1):24. https://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40468-025-00360-1
4. Ayanwale MA, Idowu KO, Adelana OP, Shosanya SO, Falebita OS, Adewale KA. Quantifying teachers’ readiness for artificial intelligence adoption in education: a mathematical modeling perspective. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2025 Jul 18; 15(1):26043. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-08018-x
5. Terblanche A, van Rooyen AA, Enwereji PC. When teachers become learners: Challenges with the integration of critical thinking into accounting curricula. Think Ski Creat [Internet]. 2025 Dec;58:101878. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871187125001270
6. Lin L-C, Tsou W. Technology-mediated online EMI professional development: Developing faculty self-efficacy and teaching practice through the community of inquiry framework. System [Internet]. 2025 Oct;133:103727. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0346251X2500137X
7. Brazil AM, Swyers SC, Ecker‐Lyster M. Come for the Professional Capital, Stay for the Community Cultural Wealth: Motivations and Pedagogical Outcomes for Educators Earning ESOL Endorsements in a Test‐Only State. TESOL J [Internet]. 2025 Sep 15; 16(3). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesj.70059
8. HarlanEller K. “New Ways of Knowing”: Collaborative Multimodal Response Assignments in Teacher Education. J Adolesc Adult Lit [Internet]. 2025 Jul 3; 69(1). https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaal.70014
9. MacCallum K. Integrating computational thinking through digital creation: The (TPAC)2K model. Teach Teach Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jul;161:105056. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0742051X25001325
10. Ubaque-Casallas DF, Aguirre-Garzón EA, Molina-Ríos JA, Salazar-Sierra AM. English Language Pedagogization: A Territory-Based Approach to Student-Teachers’ Epistemologies. Rev Colomb Educ [Internet]. 2025 Mar 7; (96):e20384. https://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/20384
11. Zach S, Arnon M, Fox O, Lidor R. Teaching through Turbulence: Post-Pandemic Pedagogical Shifts in Physical Education Teacher Training. Int Sport Stud [Internet]. 2025 Jun 29; 47(1):4–34. https://issjournal.iscpes.net/index.php/iss/article/view/46
12. Flores K, Gadaza A, Galdonez D, Pihnuton J, Soriano R, Killip AJ. Decolonizing Pedagogy: Integrating Indigenous Knowledge and Philippine Historical Narratives in Higher Education Curricula. Int J Cult Hist Relig [Internet]. 2025 Jun 16; 7(1):333–56. https://ijchr.net/index.php/journal/article/view/130
13. Deshaies I. Changes in Support Intervention Practices in Mathematics for 5-Year-Old Preschool Education: The Importance of a Collaborative and Reflective Process. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2025 Jun 13; 15(6):741. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/6/741
14. Fan H, Li M. Gender and regional differences in technological pedagogical readiness among primary mathematics teachers in post-pandemic China. Educ Inf Technol [Internet]. 2025 Jun 17; 30(8):10281–310. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-024-13255-0
15. Lkamel K, Assermouh J. Exploring the factors influencing innovative teaching practices in Moroccan primary schools: an exploratory study. Int J Eval Res Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jun 1; 14(3):1834. https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/32917
16. Koirala KP. De/colonizing epistemic of science teaching styles among novice and experienced teachers in Nepal: a case study of multicultural classroom. Cult Stud Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jun 3; 20(1–2):115–33. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11422-024-10245-z
17. Cheah YH, Lu J, Kim J. Integrating generative artificial intelligence in K-12 education: Examining teachers’ preparedness, practices, and barriers. Comput Educ Artif Intell [Internet]. 2025 Jun;8:100363. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666920X25000037
18. Jaya S, Zaharudin R, Amar Singh PS s/o. Designing a computational thinking module for STEM teachers: a design and development approach. Int J Eval Res Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jun 1; 14(3):2197. https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/32540
19. Belkina M, Daniel S, Nikolic S, Haque R, Lyden S, Neal P, et al. Implementing generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies. Comput Educ Artif Intell [Internet]. 2025 Jun;8:100407. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666920X25000475
20. Peretti S, Caruso F, Pino MC, Giancola M, D’Amico S, Di Mascio T. The CrazySquare project for music learning in Italian school-age pre-adolescents: integrating technology into educational practice. J Comput Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jun 30; 12(2):503–27. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40692-024-00320-3
21. Carrasco-Aguilar C, Ortiz-Mallegas S, Martín-Civantos M, Luzón Trujillo A. The Engineer as a Teacher. Int J Eng Pedagog [Internet]. 2025 May 21; 15(4):110–26. https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jep/article/view/50987
22. Romero-Ochoa M-A, Romero-González J-A, Perez-Soltero A, Terven J, García-Ramírez T, Córdova-Esparza D-M, et al. Knowledge Management Strategies Supported by ICT for the Improvement of Teaching Practice: A Systematic Review. Information [Internet]. 2025 May 18; 16(5):414. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/5/414
23. Aggleton J, Mannard E, Aljanahi MH, Ehret C. Overcoming barriers and improving outcomes: teachers’ perspectives on using narrative videogames to teach literacy/English. Literacy [Internet]. 2025 May 13; 59(2):165–76. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.12384
24. Rhew BT, Lilley KD, Lineback R, Spencer E. Tips and Tricks for Mentoring New Educators. In: Mentoring Students and Instructors for Retention and Success [Internet]. IGI Global; 2025. p. 77–120. https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-7590-7.ch004
25. Rodríguez-Padín R. Developing Mathematical Competencies in Teachers. In: Holistic Approaches to Teacher Development [Internet]. IGI Global; 2025. p. 171–204. https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3373-0472-4.ch008
26. Lapidot-Lefler N. Teacher Responsiveness in Inclusive Education: A Participatory Study of Pedagogical Practice, Well-Being, and Sustainability. Sustainability [Internet]. 2025 Mar 25; 17(7):2919. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2919
27. Thu TT, Lap TQ, Cang NT. Research Engagement in Practice: From EFL University Lecturers’ Perceived Effects to Strategies for Integration into Teaching. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res [Internet]. 2025 Apr 30; 24(4):93–110. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/12878
28. Huong TT, Minh LH, Linh NT, Vy PNT. The Voice of Primary Teacher Education Alumni: From Satisfaction to Suggestions for Training Enhancement. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res [Internet]. 2025 Apr 30; 24(4):111–26. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/12947
29. Freeman AS, Carter TB, Google AN, Jia Z, Grinath AS. Learning to Support Students to Reason Through Talk: How Pedagogically (Dis)Content Teaching Assistants Use a Curriculum Guide Integrated With Professional Development. Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Mar 28; 109(2):537–60. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21919
30. Getenet S, Fielding J, Hay I, Callingham R. Describing a teacher’s pedagogical mathematical knowledge in STEM teaching. Math Educ Res J [Internet]. 2025 Mar 22; 37(1):1–26. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13394-023-00480-y
31. Castro A, Díaz B, Aguilera C, Prat M, Chávez-Herting D. Identifying Rural Elementary Teachers’ Perception Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Practices. Sustainability [Internet]. 2025 Mar 20; 17(6):2748. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2748
32. Awang NE, Zulkifli H, Hamzah MI. Factors Affecting Teachers’ Implementation of Innovative Pedagogies: A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res [Internet]. 2025 Mar 30; 24(3):366–82. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/12622
33. Healy S, Walaszczyk J, Martins M de L, Fonseca P, Buss C, Rabat A. Facilitating global virtual exchange: Insights from a feminist perspective. Res Comp Int Educ [Internet]. 2025 Mar 21; 20(1):69–87. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17454999241301611
34. Kewalramani S, Devi A, Ng A. Supporting Early Childhood Preservice Teachers to Effectively Integrate STEM in Their Future Teaching Practice. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2025 Feb 5; 15(2):189. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/189
35. Loi NT, Hong B Van. Exploring Vietnamese Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices in Integrating Skills in General English Classrooms. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res [Internet]. 2025 Feb 28; 24(2):586–612. http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/12572
36. Jiang J, Abu Ziden A. Development of a teacher competency model in game-based learning: a need analysis. Int J Eval Res Educ [Internet]. 2025 Feb 1; 14(1):621. https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/31831
37. Novitskaya Y, Gordon RR, Hartman DK, Green-Eneix C. Curators and Mediators of Language, Content, Pedagogy, and Technology: Teachers’ Expanding Roles in Fully-Online CLIL Contexts. Chinese J Appl Linguist [Internet]. 2025 Feb 25; 48(1):50–69. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2025-0104/html
38. De Costa PI, Hartman D, Green-Eneix C, Philip Montgomery D. Advancing CLIL Approaches in EMI Settings Through International Collaboration: An Introduction. Chinese J Appl Linguist [Internet]. 2025 Feb 25; 48(1):3–11. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2025-0101/html
39. Olayiwola J, Yusuf AO, Akanmu AA, Murzi H, Gao X, Afsari K. Construction practice knowledge for complementing classroom teaching during site visits. Smart Sustain Built Environ [Internet]. 2025 Jan 2; 14(1):119–39. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689187.3709614
40. Kolajo Y. Advancing pedagogical excellence through reflective teaching practice and adaptation. Reflective Pract [Internet]. 2025 May 12; 1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623943.2025.2504143
41. Aumiller R. Pedagogical Wellness in Dance Education: Practical Applications for the Studio Classroom. J Danc Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jul 7; 1–8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15290824.2025.2464779
42. Devi VR, Singh R, Aravind K, Kumar PP, Anitha G. Transforming Teaching Practices: The Critical Role of Teaching-Learning Centers in Academic Institutions. J Eng Educ Transform [Internet]. 2025 May 12; 38(IS2):546–9. https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/2122/2065
43. Pun J, Luke Moorhouse B, Tan A. Exploring the teaching challenges and pedagogical strategies of teachers in English-medium instruction in online modalities. In: English-Medium Instruction Pedagogy in Disciplinary Classrooms [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2025. p. 25–41. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003432500/chapters/10.4324/9781003432500-3
44. Tierney G, Adams C, Ward S. In the Service of Student Engagement: Project-Based Learning Classrooms and Teacher Practices. J Exp Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jan 2; 93(1):38–53. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00220973.2023.2287446
45. Sandoval-Ríos F, Gajardo-Poblete C, López-Núñez JA. Role of data literacy training for decision-making in teaching practice: a systematic review. Front Educ [Internet]. 2025 Mar 31;10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1485821/full
46. Consadine CE, Goodman SG. Becoming a Better Teacher Means Becoming a Better Learner: Metacognitive Abilities Predict Effective Learning Strategy Use by College Instructors. Coll Teach [Internet]. 2025 Feb 11; 1–9. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/87567555.2025.2463894
47. Neves da Silva JR, Santos AL dos, Silva GA, DaHora SAB. Joint constructions of pedagogical practices on the teaching of experimental physics among higher education professors: analysis of the potential of a joint planning group. Investig in Science Teaching [Internet]. 2025 May 1; 30(1):336–68. https://ienci.if.ufrgs.br/index.php/ienci/article/view/4244
48. Rugano P, Masingila JO, Kamau LM, Makumba P, Omoze H. Using video case studies to provide prospective secondary teachers in Kenya opportunities to notice and reflect on pedagogical practices. Teach Educ [Internet]. 2025 Apr 3; 36(2):125–41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10476210.2024.2446289
49. Lin Y, Curle S. Understanding Willingness to Communicate in English Medium Instruction: Cultural and Pedagogical Influences on Chinese University Students. Asia-Pacific Educ Res [Internet]. 2025 Jan 22; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40299-025-00973-3
50. Fortet J. Structured pedagogy in rural Uganda: teachers’ use of structured lesson plans. J Educ Teach [Internet]. 2025 Mar 15; 51(2):216–29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02607476.2025.2449673
51. Dack H, Ann Tomlinson C. Preparing Novice Teachers to Differentiate Instruction: Implications of a Longitudinal Study. J Teach Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jan 20; 76(1):12–28. https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3373-2267-4.ch010
52. Xu Y, Zhang Z, Lai C. Culture-DPACK: A TPACK scale for evaluating Chinese language teachers’ perceptions of integrated literacies. Educ Inf Technol [Internet]. 2025 Apr 10; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-025-13538-0
53. Bhaw N, Beer J De, Kriek J. An Assessment of Teacher Professional Development Interventions for the Integration of Indigenous Knowledge in Science. Sci Educ Int [Internet]. 2025 Mar 29; 36(1):25–34. https://www.icaseonline.net/journal/index.php/sei/article/view/891
54. Lan G, Feng X, Du S, Song F, Xiao Q. Integrating ethical knowledge in generative AI education: constructing the GenAI-TPACK framework for university teachers’ professional development. Educ Inf Technol [Internet]. 2025 Feb 12; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-025-13427-6
55. Zhang W, Li L, Disney L. How kindergarten teachers in China create conditions for children’s mathematics concept learning. Early Years [Internet]. 2025 May 4; 1–19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09575146.2025.2499874
56. Jones L, Smith M, Martinez A, Cooper S. Using instructional coaching to support elementary preservice mathematics teachers’ development of questioning strategies. Sch Sci Math [Internet]. 2025 Jan 28; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ssm.18332
57. Scheiner T. Transformative learning: noticing student strengths through frame shifting. ZDM – Math Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jul 7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11858-025-01715-x
58. Vieira EE, Medeiros FP de A. Feasibility Analysis of an Immersive Network Laboratory as a Support Tool for Teaching Practices. J Interact Syst [Internet]. 2025 Apr 7; 16(1):236–55. https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/jis/article/view/5352
59. Jain J, Mok SJ, Lee YL. EXPLORING SCIENCE TEACHERS’ TRANSLATION OF NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) KNOWLEDGE TO PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (NOS PCK). Malaysian J Learn Instr [Internet]. 2025 Jan 31; 22(1):200–15. https://www.e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/mjli/article/view/22355
60. de Souza e Silva RF, Deimling N, Valderrama P. A DIDACTIC-PEDAGOGICAL PROPOSAL USING A FREE SOFTWARE TO INTERPRET THE PCA. Quim Nova [Internet]. 2025; https://quimicanova.sbq.org.br/audiencia_pdf.asp?aid2=9740&nomeArquivo=ED2023-0336.pdf
61. Lakhe Shrestha BL, Dahal N, Hasan MK, Paudel S, Kapar H. Generative AI on professional development: a narrative inquiry using TPACK framework. Front Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jun 4;10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1550773/full
62. Wahyuni A, Kusumah YS, Martadiputra BAP, Hendriyanto A. Technological-pedagogical knowledge in problem-solving teaching: an exploratory study of mathematics teachers. Int J Learn Technol [Internet]. 2025; 20(2):212–37. http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=146793
63. Ali BT, Abdellah H-A, Hicham O, Ouidad B, Mohamed E-S. From hesitation to integration: A UTAUT model analysis of ChatGPT adoption in Moroccan universities. Edelweiss Appl Sci Technol [Internet]. 2025 May 28; 9(5):2980–95. https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/7623
64. Thao LT, Yen PH, Thuy PT, Chau TNB. Reflective syllabus design: exploring Vietnamese tertiary EFL teachers’ perceptions of syllabus revision as a practice of reflective teaching. Reflective Pract [Internet]. 2025 Apr 19; 1–10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623943.2025.2494317
65. Pawliszko J. Integrating translanguaging and multimodal resources in EMI classrooms: a comparative study of inclusive strategies. Innov Lang Learn Teach [Internet]. 2025 Feb 17; 1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17501229.2025.2462112
66. Manurung S, Anwar S, Saimroh S, Ryandi R, Bahri AN, Zueni A. Political News Literacy in Indonesian Classrooms. J Polit Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jul 2; 1–14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15512169.2025.2523387
67. Refvem E, Jones MG. Science Instructional Coaches: Characteristics, Contexts, Beliefs, and Community. J Sci Teacher Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jan 2; 36(1):28–47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1046560X.2024.2370702
68. Wang S, Sitthiworachart J. Enhancing preservice teacher education: Integrating assistive technology and UDL within the TPACK framework: A systematic literature review. Edelweiss Appl Sci Technol [Internet]. 2025 Apr 28; 9(4):2706–21. https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/6642
69. Nair B (Kichu) R, Bleasel J, Mwangi F, Malau-Aduli BS. Reimagining faculty development: A paradigm shift from content to transformative learning processes. Med Teach [Internet]. 2025 Jun 3; 47(6):976–84. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2390035
70. Morady Moghaddam M, Parsaiyan SF. The mediational role of ‘teacher guides’ in TESOL: teachers’ reported practices on scaffolding, appropriation, and self-regulation. Lang Cult Curric [Internet]. 2025 Apr 3; 38(2):131–57. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07908318.2024.2423757
71. Azzam A, Charles T. K-12 STEM Teachers’ Experiences with Artificial Intelligence. TEM J [Internet]. 2025 Feb 27; 463–8. https://www.temjournal.com/content/141/TEMJournalFebruary2025_463_468.html
72. Zhuang T, Cheung ACK, Lau WWF, Su Y. What affects the teaching agency of university instructors? A social realist perspective. Asia Pacific J Educ [Internet]. 2025 Mar 15; 45(2):531–50. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02188791.2023.2167807
73. Tran D, Bull R, Waschl N. Measuring preservice teacher beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching: an evaluation of the TEDS-M beliefs scale. Math Educ Res J [Internet]. 2025 Apr 21; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13394-025-00526-3
74. Uyar A. EFFECTIVE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS IN STEM EDUCATION: PERSPECTIVES OF STEM EDUCATORS. J Balt Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jun 25; 24(3):552–66. https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/1481
75. Ghim H. Transcending Translation: A Qualitative Case Study of Chinese Teachers’ Translanguaging Practices in Supporting Chinese Children and Families in the United States. Early Child Educ J [Internet]. 2025 Mar 25; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10643-025-01901-2
76. Mäkiharju A, Hilli C. Curriculum leadership of cross-curricular teaching in lower secondary school – the Finnish principal as a mediator. J Curric Stud [Internet]. 2025 Mar 4; 57(2):111–32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00220272.2024.2323584
77. Hurrell ER, Hutchinson SM, Yorke L, Batty LC, Bunting MJ, Swanton D, et al. The role of virtual field trips in Geography higher education: A perspective paper. Area [Internet]. 2025 Mar 31; https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/area.70011
78. Guo F, Li T, Cunningham CJL. One year in the classroom with ChatGPT: empirical insights and transformative impacts. Front Educ [Internet]. 2025 May 27;10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1574477/full
79. Bateman KM, Conrath B, Ham J, Egger A, St. John K, Shipley T. Managing disruptions and dilemmas in online geoscience instruction during the early 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. J Geosci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jul 3; 73(3):276–89. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10899995.2024.2388014
80. Stackpool L, Premarathna GI, Jacobi L. Flipped Classroom and Supplemental Instruction in a High-Structure Course Design and Their Effects on Students’ Learning in Gateway Chemistry Course. Int J Learn High Educ [Internet]. 2025; 32(2):241–66. https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/flipped-classroom-and-supplemental-instruction-in-a-highstructure-course-design
81. Yuan Z, Zhong X, Huang W, Li Z, Tang X, Tan Q. GenAI-enabled microteaching lesson study: developing prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK in an online summer camp. Int J Lesson Learn Stud [Internet]. 2025 Jun 6; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLLS-11-2024-0273/full/html
82. Sert O, Wulff Sahlén E, Schröter T. Corpus-Based Reflective Practice for Professional Development: A Collaborative Micro Auto-Ethnography. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2025 Jan 13; 15(1):79. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/1/79
83. Çer E. Enhancing lecturer awareness of technology integration within the TPACK framework: A mixed methods study. STEM Educ [Internet]. 2025; 5(3):356–82. http://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/steme.2025018
84. Ab Rashid R, M.Madanat H, Al-Smadi OA, Mohamed M, Alqaryouti MH, Hashmi UM, et al. We are clueless: The voices of jordanian teachers untrained in conflict-sensitive pedagogy. Teach Teach Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jan;153:104839. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0742051X2400372X
85. Stockero SL, Van Zoest LR, Leatham KR, Peterson BE. Noticing in the midst of building on a critical event. J Math Teach Educ [Internet]. 2025 Feb 1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10857-024-09675-x
86. Handrianto C, Nor-Azhar NF. Augmented reality competencies and integration challenges among primary school teacher education students: a mixed-methods study. Perspect Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Mar 1; 73(1):651–64. https://pnojournal.wordpress.com/2025/03/01/salmaini/
87. Dimici K. The Place of Global Issues in Foreign Language Classes from the Perspective of English Lecturers: A Critical Look. J Lang Educ [Internet]. 2025 Mar 31; 11(1):56–69. https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/21868
88. Østerlie O, Killian CM. Flipped learning in physical education: evolutions over a decade and future horizons. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog [Internet]. 2025 Apr 24; 1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17408989.2025.2497326
89. Xing W, Song Y, Li C, Liu Z, Zhu W, Oh H. Development of a generative AI ‐powered teachable agent for middle school mathematics learning: A design‐based research study. Br J Educ Technol [Internet]. 2025 Apr 17; https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13586
90. Patil MP, Mahgoub YOM, Salama AM, Tahoun Z, Johnston L, Hamza N, et al. Cultivating sustainable architecture and built environments through cross-cultural education. Smart Sustain Built Environ [Internet]. 2025 Jul 1; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SASBE-03-2025-0108/full/html
91. Le Paven Jarno M. A didactic approach to the adjustments involved in physical and sports education. Comparison of examples on the use of forms-representations in the teaching of throws in athletics. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog [Internet]. 2025 Apr 8; 1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17408989.2025.2489674
92. Grannäs J, Frelin A, Östlin T. Unpacking flexibility in innovative learning environments - teachers’ experiences in practice. Educ Stud [Internet]. 2025 Jan 7; 1–17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03055698.2024.2448781
93. Alfredo RD, Echeverria V, Zhao L, Lawrence L, Fan JX, Yan L, et al. Designing a Human-centred Learning Analytics Dashboard In-use. J Learn Anal [Internet]. 2024 Oct 21; 1–20. https://learning-analytics.info/index.php/JLA/article/view/8487
94. Abedi EA. Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. J Comput Educ [Internet]. 2024 Dec 12; 11(4):1215–34. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6
95. Sukkurwalla A, Zaidi SJA, Taqi M, Waqar Z, Qureshi A. Exploring medical educators’ perspectives on teaching effectiveness and student learning. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2024 Dec 18; 24(1):1433. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-024-06465-0
96. Ofosu-Ampong K. Beyond the hype: exploring faculty perceptions and acceptability of AI in teaching practices. Discov Educ [Internet]. 2024 Apr 23; 3(1):38. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44217-024-00128-4
97. van Ameijde J, Cheng S, Wang H. Integrating Urban Analytics into Postgraduate Urban Design Pedagogy: A Mixed-Methods Teaching Approach to Addressing Urban Liveability. J Plan Educ Res [Internet]. 2024 Dec 7; 44(4):2350–63. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0739456X231162842
98. Wang H, Dang A, Wu Z, Mac S. Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines. Comput Educ Artif Intell [Internet]. 2024 Dec;7:100326. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666920X24001292
99. Yánez-Pérez I, Toma RB, Meneses-Villagrá JÁ. The IndagApp mobile app: an inquiry-based science teaching resource: usability evaluation with pre-service teachers. J New Approaches Educ Res [Internet]. 2024 Apr 29; 13(1):7. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44322-024-00008-7
100. Nguyen PT, Nguyen LT, Nguyen VM. Teacher practices regarding teaching presence in Vietnamese tertiary online distance education programmes. Humanit Soc Sci Commun [Internet]. 2024 Aug 22; 11(1):1062. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03549-6
101. Schmitz B. What teachers can do to enhance students’ well-being: Discussion. Learn Instr [Internet]. 2024 Dec;94:101980. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959475224001075
102. Auby H, Jeong B, Bureau C, Koretsky MD. From cognitive coach to social architect: shifts in learning assistants’ valued practices. Int J STEM Educ [Internet]. 2024 Oct 29; 11(1):55. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-024-00515-1
103. Mphahlele RS, Ngoveni MA, Mphuthi GT. Enhancing Mathematics Teaching in Open Distance and e-Learning: Effective External Supervision Strategies. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res [Internet]. 2024 Dec 30; 23(12):216–36. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/11879
104. Kraft AR, Atieh EL, Shi L, Stains M. Prior experiences as students and instructors play a critical role in instructors’ decision to adopt evidence-based instructional practices. Int J STEM Educ [Internet]. 2024 Mar 25; 11(1):18. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-024-00478-3
105. Shi L, Ding A-C (Elisha), Choi I. Investigating Teachers’ Use of an AI-Enabled System and Their Perceptions of AI Integration in Science Classrooms: A Case Study. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2024 Oct 30; 14(11):1187. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/11/1187
106. Machado Godoy JP, Milani R. Use of unconventional algorithms in the teaching of basic arithmetic. Prometeica - Rev Filos y Ciencias [Internet]. 2024 Nov 29; 31:311–25. https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/prometeica/article/view/16407
107. Ulum ÖG. Empowering voices: A deep dive into translanguaging perceptions among Turkish high school and university language learners. Heliyon [Internet]. 2024 Oct; 10(20):e39557. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844024155880
108. Shamsudin NM, Hoon TS, Aris SRS, Yunus MM. Metaverse Technology for Teacher Training Programmes in Higher Learning Institutions: Perceptions of Teacher Trainees. Asian J Univ Educ [Internet]. 2024 Oct 31; 20(3):717–27. https://ajue.uitm.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/12-Nurshamshida-Md-Shamsudin.-Metaverse-Technology.pdf
109. Ahmed HN, Mahmood S. Focus on form, forms, or meaning in grammar instruction: a study of Pakistani university EFL teachers’ cognition and practices. Lang Learn High Educ [Internet]. 2024 Oct 28; 14(2):435–62. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2023-0047/html
110. Córdova MMER, Orozco MEP, Castillo MJAC. Pedagogical Support in Human Talent Management: A Systematic Review. J Ecohumanism [Internet]. 2024 Nov 10; 3(7). https://ecohumanism.co.uk/joe/ecohumanism/article/view/4697
111. Llangari JDC, Correa XPC, Simbaña CRQ, Porras EBC. Good Teaching Practices in Education and Support to Learning in Middle School. J Ecohumanism [Internet]. 2024 Oct 30; 3(7):4183–9. https://ecohumanism.co.uk/joe/ecohumanism/article/view/4541
112. Radović S. Is it only about technology? The interplay between educational technology for mathematics homework, teaching practice, and students’ activities. J Comput Educ [Internet]. 2024 Sep 19; 11(3):743–62. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40692-023-00277-9
113. Sahn SF, Riesen K. Building a community of practice for instruction librarians: Programmatic elements and strategies for implementation. J Acad Librariansh [Internet]. 2024 Sep; 50(5):102928. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0099133324000892
114. Ion G, Kowalczuk‐Walędziak M, Brown C. Unlocking the potential of research‐informed practice: Insights into benefits, challenges, and significance among teachers in Catalonia, Poland, and England. Eur J Educ [Internet]. 2024 Sep 18; 59(3). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12639
115. Lutaj L, Grillo Mukli H, Gokaj R, Muho A. Professional Anxiety in Pedagogical Communication: Mitigating Effects of Teaching Methodology. J Educ Soc Res [Internet]. 2024 Sep 5; 14(5):473. https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/13990
116. Walker A, Yoon B, Pankowski J. Advancing Middle Grade Research on Critical Pedagogy: Research Synthesis. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2024 Sep 11; 14(9):997. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/9/997
117. Li M, Noori AQ. Exploring the nexus of attitude, contextual factors, and AI utilization intentions: A PLS-SEM analysis among primary mathematics teachers in China. Asian J Math Educ [Internet]. 2024 Sep 5; 3(3):289–311. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/27527263241269060
118. Sikder S. Studying children’s small science and early engineering learning process to help shape their cultural identity in culturally valued play-based experience. Cult Stud Sci Educ [Internet]. 2024 Sep 19; 19(2–3):231–55. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11422-023-10209-9
119. Engle EW, Larkins M, Bratman E, Higgins AK. Centering diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice in environmental studies and sciences by practicing compassionate pedagogies. J Environ Stud Sci [Internet]. 2024 Sep 14; 14(3):469–83. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-024-00952-y
120. Furman M, Luzuriaga M, Taylor I, Podestá ME. How does coaching influence teacher implementation of a science programme? Evidence from an experimental study. Int J Mentor Coach Educ [Internet]. 2021 Dec 13; 10(4):449–65. http://www.emerald.com/ijmce/article/10/4/449-465/140435
121. Souza GF de, Lopes PTC. The perspective of public schools mathematics teachers on their knowledge and teaching practice in connection with the BNCC. Acta Sci [Internet]. 2021 Nov 18; 23(6):93–120. http://www.periodicos.ulbra.br/index.php/acta/article/view/6839
122. Feixas M, Martínez-Usarralde M-J. The transfer of teaching innovation projects: a study on their capacity to transform teaching and learning. Educating [Internet]. 2022 Jan 31; 58(1):69–84. https://educar.uab.cat/article/view/v58-n1-feixas-martinez
123. Irwahand FNE, Mat-Rasid SM, Lee JLF, Elumalai G, Shahril MI, Ahmad MAI. Perceived barriers to adopting information and communication technology in physical education. Pedagog Phys Cult Sport [Internet]. 2022 Sep 26; 26(5):291–9. https://sportpedagogy.org.ua/index.php/ppcs/article/view/1981
124. Wiese AF, Lima FV, Retamero FPA, Haracemiv SMC, Kaiper-Marquez A. Seeing behind the fog: A case study on teachers' working conditions during the pandemic in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Educ Policy Anal Arch [Internet]. 2022 Nov 8;30. https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/7320
125. Artiles Olivera I, Peralta González MJ, Martínez Paz D, Peralta Castellón L. Formative Evaluation and Information Management: alternative pedagogical support to teachers in the Information Sciences career. Data Metadata [Internet]. 2022 Dec 3;1:68. https://dm.ageditor.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/21
126. Walsh LL, Bills RJ, Lo SM, Walter EM, Weintraub BE, Withers MD. We Can’t Fail Again: Arguments for Professional Development in the Wake of COVID-19. J Microbiol Biol Educ [Internet]. 2022 Apr 29; 23(1). https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.00323-21
127. Leinonen R, Kesonen MHP, Asikainen MA. Finnish university physics teachers’ experiences of transferring to online teaching due to COVID-19 pandemic. SN Soc Sci [Internet]. 2023 Mar 23; 3(4):68. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43545-023-00647-1
128. MacKinnon G, MacLean T. Emergency Remote Teaching: The Challenges Associated with a Context of Second Language Instruction. Can J Learn Technol [Internet]. 2023 Jul 17; 49(1):1–23. https://cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/28277
129. Arredondo JLA, Vera JRE, Mejia PJC. Model of pedagogical accompaniment from a socio-critical reflective perspective for teaching performance in pre-professional practice, Abancay 2024. Edelweiss Appl Sci Technol [Internet]. 2024 Dec 28; 8(6):9128–41. https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/3949
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jhon Christian Perez-Ruiz, Teresa Chara-DelosRios, María Elizabeth Aquije-Mansilla, Beymar Pedro Solis-Trujillo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
