Global Research Trends in Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills: A Bibliometric Review of 2020–2024 Publications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025453Keywords:
Mathematical Problem Solving, Bibliometric Analysis, Scopus, Global Trends, Mathematics EducationAbstract
Introduction: Mathematical problem-solving skills are a core competency in 21st-century education, linked to critical, creative, and reflective thinking. This study mapped the global development and research direction of this topic using bibliometric analysis.
Methods: The research followed four systematic stages: retrieving Scopus articles with the keywords “problem-solving skills” and “mathematics,” filtering relevant documents, validating metadata, and conducting visual analysis via VOSviewer. A total of 295 documents were analyzed.
Results: Publications surged in 2020 (42 documents), 2021 (36), and 2023 (35), reflecting shifts during and post-COVID-19. Journal articles (49.2%) and conference papers (47.8%) dominated, with minimal contributions from reviews (1.0%) and books (0.3%). Key sources included the Journal of Physics: Conference Series and AIP Conference Proceedings. Subject areas were primarily social sciences (31.4%), physics/astronomy (24.4%), and mathematics (9.0%). Keyword analysis revealed five thematic clusters, while Indonesia led in publications (146 documents), followed by the U.S. and Malaysia.
Conclusions: The study confirmed mathematical problem-solving as a rapidly growing interdisciplinary field, progressing toward theoretical consolidation and cross-sector collaboration. Future research could address gaps in review articles and diversify geographic contributions.
References
1. Sukri, A., Rizka, M. A., Purwanti, E., Ramdiah, S., & Lukitasari M. European Journal of Educational Research. Eur J Educ Res. 2022;11(2):859–72.
2. Li D, Fan X, Meng L. Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1–20.
3. Lepore M. A holistic framework to model student’s cognitive process in mathematics education through fuzzy cognitive maps. Heliyon. 2024;10(16):e35863.
4. Ismail RN, Arnawa IM. Improving StudentsReasoning and Communication Mathematical Ability by Applying Contextual Approach of The 21st Century at A Junior High School In Padang. In: 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education 2018 (ICM2E 2018). Atlantis Press; 2018. p. 144–9.
5. Kassenkhan AM, Moldagulova AN, Serbin V V. Gamification and Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review of Innovative Approaches to Fostering Critical Thinking. IEEE Access. 2025;13(May).
6. Asysyauqi MF, Riyadi A, Jauhari MI. The Revival of Classical Wisdom : Implementing Mixed Learning Approach The Revival of Classical Wisdom : Implementing Mixed Learning Approach Based on Ibnu Khaldun ’ s Theory in Pesantren. 2024;(November).
7. Ismail RN, Mudjiran N. Membangun karakter melalui Implementasi Teori Belajar behavioristik pembelajaran matematika berbasis kecakapan abad 21. Menara Ilmu J Penelit dan Kaji Ilm. 2019;13(11).
8. Ismail RN, Yerizon AF. Students’ Perception of the Digital Learning System for Junior High Schools in Padang, Indonesia. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci. 2023;50(1).
9. Grandgirard J, Poinsot D, Krespi L, Nénon JP, Cortesero AM. Costs of secondary parasitism in the facultative hyperparasitoid Pachycrepoideus dubius: Does host size matter? Entomol Exp Appl. 2002;103(3):239–48.
10. Lengnick-Hall CA, Beck TE, Lengnick-Hall ML. Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2011;21(3):243–55.
11. Holman D, Švejdarová E. The 21st-Century Empowering Wholeness Adaptive (EWA) Educational Model Transforming Learning Capacity and Human Capital through Wholeness Systems Thinking towards a Sustainable Future. Sustain . 2023;15(2).
12. Burke CM, Morley MJ. Toward a non-organizational theory of human resource management? A complex adaptive systems perspective on the human resource management ecosystem in (con)temporary organizing. Hum Resour Manage. 2023;62(1):31–53.
13. García-Pérez L, García-Garnica M, Olmedo-Moreno EM. Skills for a working future: How to bring about professional success from the educational setting. Educ Sci. 2021;11(1):1–25.
14. Ivaldi S, Scaratti G, Fregnan E. Dwelling within the fourth industrial revolution: organizational learning for new competences, processes and work cultures. J Work Learn. 2022;34(1):1–26.
15. Poláková M, Suleimanová JH, Madzík P, Copuš L, Molnárová I, Polednová J. Soft skills and their importance in the labour market under the conditions of Industry 5.0. Heliyon. 2023;9(8).
16. Ada N, Ilic D, Sagnak M. A Framework for New Workforce Skills in the Era of Industry 4.0. Int J Math Eng Manag Sci. 2021;6(3):111–86.
17. Gahan P, Theilacker M, Adamovic M, Choi D, Harley B, Healy J, et al. Between fit and flexibility? The benefits of high-performance work practices and leadership capability for innovation outcomes. Vol. 31, Human Resource Management Journal. 2021. 414–437 p.
18. Xu B, Lu X, Yang X, Bao J. Mathematicians’, mathematics educators’, and mathematics teachers’ professional conceptions of the school learning of mathematical modelling in China. ZDM - Math Educ. 2022;54(3):679–91.
19. Faulkner F, Breen C, Prendergast M, Carr M. Profiling mathematical procedural and problem-solving skills of undergraduate students following a new mathematics curriculum. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2023;54(2):220–49.
20. Aulakh D, Asha RR, Goyal P, Garg A, Khurana S, Singh A, et al. Assessing the Impact of Creative Tasks on Cognitive and Imaginative Development in Children. Evol Stud Imaginative Cult. 2024;8(2 S2):1011–22.
21. Hernández-Martínez M, Posso-Yépez M, Cadena-Povea H, Rivadeneira-Flores J, Placencia-Enríquez F. ICT for the development of mathematical competencies in secondary education: a systematic review. Cogent Educ. 2025;12(1).
22. González MM. CURRICULAR INTEGRATION OF MATHEMATICS AND DANCE TO IMPROVE GEOMETRIC REASONING IN SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS Yanira Mayerly Salinas Suárez 1. 2025;1–41.
23. Yuniasih N, Sopandi W, Suhandi A, Syaodih E. Tracing Trends in Educational Research on Creative Problem Solving : A Bibliometric Analysis ( 2007-2024 ). 2025;17:720–35.
24. Yıldız SG. Trends and insights of AI in mathematics education : A bibliometric analysis. 2025;20(3).
25. Wardat Y, Al-Omari AAH, Khasawneh OM, Rawagah HG. Mapping the landscape: A bibliometric analysis of integrating STEM into science and mathematics classes. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2025;21(5):1–16.
26. Kumar R. Bibliometric Analysis : Comprehensive Insights into Tools , Techniques , Applications , and Solutions for Research Excellence. 2025;3(1):45–62.
27. Choirudin C, Lubis M, Masuwd MA. Enhancing High School Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills through Interactive Media: A Classroom Action Research Approach. 2025;2(2):104–21.
28. Naim MA, Rizkiya NB, Rahmatullah J. Integration of Scratch Media in Mathematics Learning to Improve Computational Thinking Skills of High School Students. 2025;2(2):62–81.
29. Engelbrecht J, Borba MC. Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM - Math Educ. 2024;56(2):281–92.
30. Santos-Trigo M. Problem solving in mathematics education: tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM - Math Educ. 2024;56(2):211–22.
31. Fitriati F, Rosli R, Iksan Z, Hidayat A. Exploring challenges in preparing prospective teachers for teaching 4C skills in mathematics classroom: A school-university partnership perspectives. Cogent Educ. 2023;11(1).
32. Mohammed AB, Zegeye RT, Dawed HA, Tessema YM. Implementation of Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education in Ethiopia: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024;15:105–19.
33. Ma Y, Yang Q, Cao R, Li B, Huang F, Li Y. How to Understand Whole Software Repository? 2024;
34. Hutchins NM, Biswas G. Co-designing teacher support technology for problem-based learning in middle school science. Br J Educ Technol. 2024;55(3):802–22.
35. Akcay B, Benek İ. Problem-Based Learning in Türkiye: A Systematic Literature Review of Research in Science Education. Educ Sci. 2024;14(3).
36. Sagatbek A, Oni TK, Adah Miller E, Gabdullina G, Balta N. Do High School Students Learn More or Shift Their Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Learning Physics with the Social Constructivism of Problem-Based Learning? Educ Sci. 2024;14(12).
37. Wang Q, Ge S, Yahya AN, Khalid NM, Li J. Exploring Engagement and Efficacy in Secondary English Education in China: A Problem-Based Social Constructivism Approach. J Lang Teach Res. 2024;15(3):902–10.
38. Ebiendele Ebosele Peter. Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African J Math Comput Sci Res. 2012;5(3):39–43.
39. Adigun OT, Mpofu N, Maphalala MC. Fostering self-directed learning in blended learning environments: A constructivist perspective in Higher Education. High Educ Q. 2024;(June 2024):1–16.
40. Asare B, Larbi E. Nexus between emotional intelligence and mathematics performance: the role of metacognitive awareness. Cogent Educ. 2025;12(1).
41. Brungs CL, Buchholtz N, Streit H, Theile Y, Rott B. Empirical reconstruction of mathematics teaching practices in problem-solving lessons: a multi-method case study. Front Educ. 2025;10(May):1–15.
42. Tak CC. Mediating role of metacognitive awareness between attitude and mathematics reasoning in pre-service teachers. 2025;13(2):90–102.
43. Cantutay Z, Taganas WR. Computer Upskilling Trainings and Teachers’ Technological Literacy: Basis for Technological Skills Enhancement Plan. Am J Arts Hum Sci. 2024;3(2):215–40.
44. Martínez-Bravo MC, Sádaba-Chalezquer C, Serrano-Puche J. Fifty years of digital literacy studies: A meta-research for interdisciplinary and conceptual convergence. Prof la Inf. 2020;29(4):1–15.
45. Hwang WY, Chen NS, Dung JJ, Yang YL. Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educ Technol Soc. 2007;10(2):191–212.
46. Care A, Committee E. Charles sturt university. 2016;(02):1–442.
47. Booth RDL, Thomas MOJ. Visualization in mathematics learning: Arithmetic problem-solving and student difficulties. J Math Behav. 1999;18(2):169–90.
48. Samo DD, Darhim, Kartasasmita BG. Culture-based contextual learning to increase problem-solving ability of first year university student. J Math Educ. 2018;9(1):81–93.
49. Simamora RE, Saragih S, Hasratuddin H. Improving Students’ Mathematical PrSimamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2018). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Jour. Int Electron J Math Educ. 2018;14(1):61–72.
50. Tsuchiya LM. An Action Research Case Study: A Sociocultural Perspective on Native American Students Learning Mathematics in a Public Elementary School Classroom. 2014;
51. Ismail RN, Fauzan A, Arnawa IM. Analysis of student learning independence as the basis for the development of digital book creations integrated by realistic mathematics. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2021. p. 12041.
52. Ismail RN, Fauzan A. Exploring Self-Regulated Learning and Their Impact on Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills on the Topic of Number Patterns With the Blended Learning System. J High Educ Theory Pract. 2023;23(16).
53. Ismail RN, Fauzan A, Yerizon. Analysis of students’ motivation and self-regulation profiles in online mathematics learning junior high school at Padang city. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2023. p. 60025.
54. Fauzan A, Nasuha R, Zafirah A. The Roles of Learning Trajectory in Teaching Mathematics Using RME Approach. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Volume II: Invited Lectures. World Scientific; 2024. p. 197–209.
55. Iswari M, Afdal A, Nurhastuti N, Syahputra Y, Ismail RN. Validation of Career Planning Instrument for Deaf (CPID): Rasch Model Analysis. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing; 2023.
56. Bugg N. Teaching critical thinking skills. Radiol Technol. 1997;68(5):433–4.
57. Finegold D, Notabartolo A. 21St-Century Competencies and Their Impact: an Interdisciplinary Literature Review. Res 21st Century Competencies, Natl Res Counc. 2010;1–50.
58. Moreno-Palma N, Hinojo-Lucena FJ, Romero-Rodríguez JM, Cáceres-Reche MP. Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in the Unplugged Computational Thinking of University Students. Educ Sci. 2024;14(7).
59. Bruno A, Polo-Blanco I, Van Vaerenbergh S, Fernández-Cobos R, González-López MJ. Strategies for solving multiplicative problems using a conceptual model-based problem-solving approach. A case study with a student with autism spectrum disorder. ZDM - Math Educ. 2024;1239–56.
60. Wong R, Mee M. Building digital thinkers : A bibliometric analysis of computational thinking in children ’ s education for a sustainable future. 2025;17(3).
61. Pacher C, Woschank M, Zunk BM, Gruber E. Engineering education 5.0: a systematic literature review on competence-based education in the industrial engineering and management discipline. Prod Manuf Res. 2024;12(1):0–45.
62. Molina-García N, González-Serrano MH, Ordiñana-Bellver D, Baena-Morales S. Redefining Education in Sports Sciences: A Theoretical Study for Integrating Competency-Based Learning for Sustainable Employment in Spain. Soc Sci. 2024;13(5).
63. Spaska A, Kozub H, Abylasynova G, Kozub V, Koval Y. Evaluation of Innovative Teaching Methods Using Modern Information Technologies. J Ilm Ilmu Terap Univ Jambi. 2025;9(1):422–40.
64. Azizan MF, Mohd Matore MEE, Omar M. A Bibliometric Analysis of Complex Problem-Solving Approaches in Engineering Education. J Appl Sci Eng Technol Educ. 2025;7(1):17–28.
65. Thanh DT, Khai M, Liem BT, Hong DT, Van NTT, An K, et al. A NALYZING TRENDS AND EMERGING PATTERNS IN TEACHING METHODS FOR CALCULUS : A VOS VIEWER - BASED BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH Calculus : A Foundational Subject and Teaching Challeng. 2025;629–58.
66. Chawinga WD, Zinn S. Global perspectives of research data sharing: A systematic literature review. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2019;41(2):109–22.
67. Heberling JM, Miller JT, Noesgaard D, Weingart SB, Schigel D. Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(6):1–7.
68. Mikalef P, Pappas I, Krogstie J, Giannakos M. Information Systems and e-Business Management. Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Inf Syst E-bus Manag. 2018;16(3):547–78.
69. Walkington CA. Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(4):932–45.
70. Rattanachaithada R, Kwangmuang P, Vongtathum P, Gamlunglert R, Srikoon S. A confirmatory factor analysis of scientific critical thinking in secondary school. Cogent Educ. 2025;12(1).
71. Manuel J, Carracedo C, Education F, Salamanca UP De. Inquiry-Based Learning in Phonetics and Phonology : Promotion of Critical Thinking Skills in an EFL Higher Education Context. 2025;18(1):1–22.
72. Ghazali, Azam Ashari ZM, Hardman J. The Effectiveness of Technology-Project-based Learning (TPBL) Module in Fostering Children’s Creative Thinking Skills Through Science Education Azam. 2025;19(1):56–75.
73. Passas I. Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. Encyclopedia. 2024;4(2).
74. Barrot JS. Trends in automated writing evaluation systems research for teaching, learning, and assessment: A bibliometric analysis. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29(6):7155–79.
75. Banerjee A, Roy K, Gramatica P. A bibliometric analysis of the Cheminformatics/QSAR literature (2000–2023) for predictive modeling in data science using the SCOPUS database. Mol Divers. 2024;(December).
76. Peters MA, Jandrić P, Irwin R, Locke K, Devine N, Heraud R, et al. Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. Educ Philos Theory. 2016;48(14):1401–25.
77. Carrera-Rivera A, Ochoa W, Larrinaga F, Lasa G. How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX. 2022;9:101895.
78. Singh VK, Singh P, Karmakar M, Leta J, Mayr P. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):5113–42.
79. Ismail RN, Mudjiran M, Neviyarni N, Nirwana H. Creative approach guidance and counseling facing independence learning policy: Minimum competency assessment and survey characters in the industrial revolution 4.0. E-Tech. 2020;8(1):391345.
80. Guz AN, Rushchitsky JJ. Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. Int Appl Mech. 2009;45(4):351–62.
81. Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Delgado López-Cózar E. Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics. 2018;116(3):2175–88.
82. Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud. 2020;1(1):377–86.
83. Zou Y, Kuek F, Feng W, Cheng X. Digital learning in the 21st century: trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Front Educ. 2025;10.
84. Levidze M. Mapping the research landscape: A bibliometric analysis of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2024;10(13):e33875.
85. Prasse D, Webb M, Deschênes M, Parent S, Aeschlimann F, Goda Y, et al. Challenges in Promoting Self-Regulated Learning in Technology Supported Learning Environments: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Technol Knowl Learn. 2024;29(4):1809–30.
86. Syarifuddin H, Riza Y, Harisman Y, Ismail RN. Students’ Response to the Use of a Flipped Learning Model (FLM) in Abstract Algebra Course. In: Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022). Atlantis Press; 2023. p. 1435–41.
87. Ismail RN, Fauzan A, Arnawa M, Armiati A. Pengembangan Hypothetical Learning Trajectory Berbasis Realistics Mathematics Education Geometri Transformasi pada Topik Rotasi. Lattice J J Math Educ Appl. 2021;1(1):74–90.
88. Yerizon I, Ismail RN. Improving Student’s Mathematical Communication Skills Through Mathematics Worksheet Based on Realistic Mathematics Education. 2020;
89. Zhang C, Wang P, Zeng X, Wang X. A case study on developing students’ problem-solving skills through interdisciplinary thematic learning. Front Psychol. 2025;16.
90. Guven İ, Alpaslan B. Investigation of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Science Activities on 5th Grade Students’ Creative Problem Solving and 21 st Century Skills. TOJET Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2022;21(1):80–96.
91. Ariza JA, Restrepo MB, Hernandez CH. Generative AI in Engineering and Computing Education: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies and Educational Practices. IEEE Access. 2025;13(February):30789–810.
92. Song Y, Huang L, Zheng L, Fan M, Liu Z. Interactions with generative AI chatbots: unveiling dialogic dynamics, students’ perceptions, and practical competencies in creative problem-solving. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2025;22(1).
93. Okada A, Sherborne T, Panselinas G, Kolionis G. Fostering Transversal Skills Through Open Schooling Supported by the CARE-KNOW-DO Pedagogical Model and the UNESCO AI Competencies Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2025.
94. Lamichhane BR. STEAM Education for Transformative Mathematics Learning Basanta Raj Lamichhane Lecturer, Department of Mathematics, Saptagandaki Multiple Campus, TU. 3243(12):36–53.
95. Wright N, Wrigley C. Broadening design-led education horizons: conceptual insights and future research directions. Int J Technol Des Educ. 2019;29(1):1–23.
96. Mahlaba SC. Exploring the discourses of preservice mathematics teachers when solving geometry problems. 2021;
97. Madileng MM, Ndlangamandla SC. Integration and Contextualisation of TPACK and ICT 21st Century Skills When e-Tutoring in Online Distance Learning. Scrutiny2. 2024;5441.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tetiana Lysenko , Svitlana Shestakova , Olga Yakovlieva , Nataliia Savastru , Oksana Mykhailova (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
