Educational innovation for entrepreneurship in the university systemAxis model applied in CUAltos

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025691

Keywords:

Academic entrepreneurship, innovation ecosystem, interdisciplinary education, digital economy, sustainability, knowledge transfer

Abstract

Academic entrepreneurship has established itself as a strategic pillar in higher education by promoting competencies focused on innovation, sustainability, and productive transformation. This article presents the experience of the Centro Universitario de los Altos in implementing a multi-axis model that combines different institutional components with the aim of strengthening the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the educational environment. The multi-axis model promotes interaction between the university, industry, and government and integrates socio-ecological, cultural, and digital factors that enable the development of a knowledge-based economy. Through this approach, students acquire essential entrepreneurial skills, digital competencies, and interdisciplinary skills necessary to succeed in a rapidly evolving market. The results underscore the effectiveness of this model in bridging the gap between academic knowledge and industry needs, ultimately fostering innovation and sustainable development.

References

Alexander, U., & Evgeniy, P. (2014). The entrepreneurial university in Russia: From idea to reality. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 10th Triple Helix Conference , 45–51. Bandung: Elsevier.

Arshad, A.S., Rasli, A., Arshad, A.A., & Zain, Z.M. (2013). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance: A study of technology-based SMEs in Malaysia. In Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences , 4th International Conference on Marketing and Retailing , 46–53. Kuala Lumpur: Elsevier.

Barbini, F.M., Corsino, M., & Giuri, P. (2021). How do universities shape their founding teams? Social proximity and informal knowledge transfer mechanisms in student entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer , 46 (4), 1046–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09799-1

Barcellos-Paula, L., De la Vega, I., & Gil-Lafuente, A.M. (2021). The quintuple helix model of innovation and the SDGs: The case of Latin American countries and their forgotten effects. Mathematics , 9 (4), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040416

Bikse, V., Lusena-Ezera, I., Rivza, B., & Volkova, T. (2016). Transforming traditional universities into entrepreneurial universities to ensure sustainable higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability , 18 (2), 75–88.

Bititci, U.S., Mendibil, K., Nudurupati, S., Garengo, P., & Turner, T. (2017). Dynamics of performance measurement and organizational culture. In A. Burcharth, P. Knudsen, & A. Søndergaard (Eds.), International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 26 (12), 1245–1269.

Burcharth, A., Præst Knudsen, M., & Søndergaard, H. (2017). The role of employee autonomy in open innovation performance. Business Process Management Journal , 23 (6), 1245–1269.

Cai, Y., & Amaral, M. (2021). The triple helix model and the future of innovation: A reflection on the triple helix research agenda. Triple Helix (Heidelberg) , 8 (2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-12340004

Cai, Y., & Lattu, A. (2022). Triple helix or quadruple helix: Which innovation model should we choose for empirical studies? Minerva , 60 (2), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09453-6

Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J., & Grigoroudis, E. (2022). The Helix Trilogy: The Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Helices of Innovation from a Theoretical, Policy, and Practical Perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 13 (3), 2272–2301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00813-x

Christensen, C.M., & Eyring, H.J. (2011). The innovative university: Transforming the DNA of higher education from within . San Francisco, CA: Wiley Imprint.

Covin, J.G., & Miller, D. (2014). International entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual considerations, research topics, measurement issues, and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 38 , 11–44.

Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., & Blois, G.V. (2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 135 , 99–111.

Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The entrepreneurial university: Vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education , 30 , 83–97.

Feola, R., Parente, R., & Cucino, V. (2021). The entrepreneurial university: How to develop entrepreneurial orientation in academia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 12 (4), 1787–1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00675-9

Ferreira, J., Reis, N., & Miranda, R. (2015). Thirty years of entrepreneurship research published in top-tier journals: Citation, co-citation, and topic analysis. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research , 5 (17), 2–22.

Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J.A., & Urbano, D. (2015). The economic impact of entrepreneurial university activities: An exploratory study from the UK. Research Policy , 44 (3), 748–764.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Introduction to partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), long-range planning . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Joo, B.K., & Bennett, R.H. (2018). The influence of proactivity on creative behavior, organizational commitment, and job performance: Evidence from a Korean multinational. Journal of International and Interdisciplinary Business Research , 5 (2), 1–21.

Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. (2015). The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation , 1–11.

Liyanage, S.I.H., & Netswera, F.G. (2022). Green universities with the mode 3 and quintuple helix innovation model: Knowledge production and innovation in the knowledge-based economy, Botswana. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 13 (2), 1126–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00769-y

Maas, G., & Jones, P. (2017). The role of entrepreneurship centers. In G. Maas & P. Jones (Eds.), Entrepreneurship centers: Global perspectives on their contributions to higher education institutions (pp. 11–18). Cham: Springer.

Mardani, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M., & Doustar, M. (2018). The relationship between knowledge management and innovation performance. Journal of High Technology Management Research , 29(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002

Mthanti, T., & Ojah, K. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation (EO): Measurement and policy implications of entrepreneurship at the macroeconomic level. Research Policy , 46(4), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.005

Navarro del Toro, G.J., & Yamaguchi Llanes, V.K. (2024). Interdisciplinary entrepreneurship: The engine of academic success in the university system. RIDE. Ibero-American Journal of Educational Research and Development , 15(29). http://dx.doi.org/10.23913/ride.v15i29.2122

Navarro del Toro, G.J. (2022). The digital marketing paradigm in academia, university entrepreneurship, and established companies. RIDE. Ibero-American Journal of Educational Research and Development , 13(25). https://www.ride.org.mx/index.php/RIDE/article/view/1321

Ndou, V., Secundo, G., Schiuma, G., & Passiante, G. (2018). Prospects for shaping entrepreneurship education: Evidence from European entrepreneurship centres. Sustainability , 10, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072399

Neves, S. (2020). Academic entrepreneurship intentions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development , 39(5), 645–704.

Pratono, A.H., & Mahmood, R. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: How can micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises survive environmental turbulence? Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences , 1(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.001

Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., & Benneworth, P. (2019). Does the entrepreneurial university also participate regionally? Analyzing the influence of university structural configuration on the performance of the third mission. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 141, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.015

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J.F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy , 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002

Schepers, J., Voordeckers, W., Steijvers, T., & Laveren, E. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in private family firms: The moderating role of socio-emotional wealth. Small Business Economics , 43(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9526-5

Secundo, G., Del Vecchio, P., Schiuma, G., & Passiante, G. (2016). Activating entrepreneurial learning processes to transform university students' ideas into entrepreneurial practices. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research , 23(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2015-0315

Secundo, G., Dumay, J., Schiuma, G., & Passiante, G. (2016). Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital , 17(2), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2015-0058

Stiglitz, J.E., & Greenwald, B.C. (2014). Creating a learning society: A new approach to growth, development, and social progress . Columbia University Press.

Taucean, I.M., Strauti, A.G., & Tion, M. (2018). Roadmap towards an entrepreneurial university: Case study. In SIM 2017/XIV International Management Symposium (Vol. 238, pp. 582–589). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.082

Wach, K. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation and the process of internationalization: The theoretical foundations of international entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review , 3(2), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2015.030202

Walker, R.M., Chen, J., & Aravind, D. (2015). Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings. European Management Journal , 33(5), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.01.001

Ye, Y., De Moortel, K., & Crispeels, T. (2020). Dynamics of knowledge transfer networks in Chinese universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer , 45(4), 1228–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09748-7

Zhang, J., van Gorp, D., & Kievit, H. (2023). Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer , 48(3), 1077–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09934-0

Ziakis, C., Vlachopoulou, M., & Petridis, K. (2022). Startup ecosystem (StUpEco): A conceptual framework and empirical research. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity , 8(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010035.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06

How to Cite

1.
Romo González LE, Bravo Silva JL, Cortés Palacios EM, Navarro del Toro GJ. Educational innovation for entrepreneurship in the university systemAxis model applied in CUAltos. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 6 [cited 2025 Jul. 19];4:691. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/691