Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding through contextualized STEM approach: advancing science literacy in health and education

Authors

  • Vanjoreeh A. Madale Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0229-755X
  • Kresha M. Lluisma Graduate Student, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author
  • Monera A. Salic-Hairulla Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9535-2465
  • Arlyn R. Alcopra Department of Professional Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9682-4433
  • Joy R. Magsayo Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-4939
  • Ariel O. Ellare Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author
  • John Jr. G. Adil Department of Professional Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8108-3988
  • Angeline P. Dinoro Department of Professional Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0821-6685

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025712

Keywords:

Contextualized STEM Approach, Plant Asexual Reproduction, Conceptual Understanding, Science Education, Student Engagement

Abstract

Introduction: understanding plant asexual reproduction is vital for fostering scientific literacy, especially in agriculture, biodiversity, and sustainability. Yet, students often struggle with these abstract concepts due to limited contextualization and practical application in traditional instruction. This study examined the effectiveness of a Contextualized STEM Approach in improving students’ conceptual understanding, performance, and perceptions.
Methods: a quantitative one-group pretest-posttest design was employed with 105 Grade 7 students from a public secondary school in Iligan City. Data were collected through a researcher-made pretest and posttest, a perception survey, and performance task scores. Analyses included descriptive statistics and paired t-tests to determine conceptual gains and intervention effects.
Results: findings revealed a significant increase in posttest scores (MD = -10.84, t = -40.996, p < 0.001). More students attained Mastery and Proficient levels, while those in the Unsatisfactory category decreased by 20%. Most groups achieved the Advanced level in performance tasks, demonstrating effective application of propagation techniques. Survey responses showed strong agreement that lessons were relevant, clear, and engaging.
Conclusions: the Contextualized STEM Approach enhanced students’ conceptual understanding, performance, and motivation in learning plant asexual reproduction. These results affirm its potential as an effective pedagogical strategy in science education. Future studies may investigate its scalability across varied topics and learner groups.

References

1. Xie K, Zhang J, Yang Y. Genomewide prediction of switchgrass apomixis-associated genes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(6):1192–204. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13041

2. Hojsgaard D, Hörandl E. The rise of apomixis in natural plant populations. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:358. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00358

3. López CM, Fernández FG, Guisado MR, López-Cobollo R. Asexual reproduction in staple food crops: mechanisms, applications, and perspectives. Plants. 2024;13(2):305. doi: 10.3390/plants13020305

4. Xoconostle-Morán AE, Avendaño-Rodríguez S, Ruiz-Medrano R. Clonal propagation of crops: a sustainable response to climate-related stress. J Agric Biotechnol. 2023;11(4):224–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jab.2023.224

5. Gao L, Zhang C, Wang Q, Chen J. Reproductive plasticity in angiosperms: a comparative study of sexual and asexual strategies under environmental stress. Bot Stud. 2023;64(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40529-023-00345-1

6. Wang T, Li Y, He H. Facultative apomixis in wild plant populations and its ecological implications. Ecol Evol. 2023;13(2):e9811. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9811

7. Higgisson W, Hovenden MJ, Brodribb TJ. Asexual reproduction and habitat specialization in marginal environments. Funct Ecol. 2022;36(7):1675–87.

8. Rushworth CA, Song BH, Lee CR. Ecological genomics in plant reproduction and adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33(8):531–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.05.006

9. Sun L, Yang D, Zhao L. Genetic and ecological insights into vegetative reproduction across plant communities. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2023;42:e02415. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02415

10. Ho M, Chen R, Liu X. Reduced genetic diversity in asexually reproducing plant species: risks and adaptation. Genet Mol Res. 2019;18(1):gmr18210.

11. Zhang Y, Li H, Xu P. Students’ misconceptions in genetics and reproduction: implications for biology teaching. J Biol Educ. 2023;57(2):123–35.

12. Marta RF, Djam’an SN, Nandiyanto ABD. Contextual teaching and learning in science education: improving students’ understanding and motivation. J Sci Learn. 2023;6(1):34–42.

13. Sinaga F, Panggabean H, Simatupang M. Improving motivation and understanding through contextual teaching strategies. Int J Educ Res Rev. 2023;8(2):321–8.

14. O’Keeffe J, Lovey R. Situated cognition and constructivist approaches in science teaching. Educ Philos Theory. 2022;54(9):1318–32. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2021.2002449

15. Rahmawati Y, Kurniawan Y, Ridwan M. The impact of contextual learning on science performance: a meta-analysis. Sci Educ Int. 2022;33(3):191–9.

16. Sudira P, Wiyasa I. Contextual learning and the development of vocational education. J Tech Educ Train. 2020;12(2):1–10. doi: 10.30880/jtet.2020.12.02.001

17. Awaludin A, Setiawan R, Sumarni W. The effectiveness of STEM-based project learning on students’ problem-solving skills. J Pendidik IPA Indones. 2024;13(1):88–95.

18. Luo Y, Lin J, Lee M. Enhancing self-efficacy in STEM: effects of integrated design-based projects. Int J STEM Educ. 2021;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00290-2

19. Julita M, Nurjanah S, Asri M. STEM learning to improve students’ motivation in secondary education. J Phys Conf Ser. 2022;2049(1):012065. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2049/1/012065

20. Cheng M, Wang X, Lin C. The relevance of STEM integration to real-life problem solving in science classrooms. Asia Pac Educ Res. 2021;30(4):345–56. doi: 10.1007/s40299-020-00533-1

21. Castle S, Jones T, Monroe S. Creativity and collaboration in STEM education: preparing students for the future. STEM Educ J. 2024;9(2):101–10.

22. Muzana A, Yusof K, Sabri S. Enhancing 21st-century skills through STEM project-based learning. J Eng Sci Technol. 2021;16(SI):88–98.

23. Sabri S, Abdullah N, Ariffin M. Contextualized STEM teaching and learning: transforming the science classroom. J Res Sci Teach. 2023;60(3):375–93. doi: 10.1002/tea.21738

24. Holmes B, Sanchez D, Wong T. Project-based STEM integration in biology: impact on student creativity and interest. Int J Sci Educ. 2022;44(10):1555–72. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2063845

25. Shidiq AW, Nasrudin H. Building awareness of STEM relevance through community-based projects. Educ Soc. 2021;39(2):215–29.

26. Kurniansyah R, Supriadi I, Mulyani T. Empowering future innovators: the role of contextualized STEM in shaping competencies. Indones J Educ Res Technol. 2022;2(3):147–55.

27. Slavinec M, Aberšek B, Gačević D, Flogie A. Monodisciplinarity in science versus transdisciplinarity in STEM education. J Baltic Sci Educ. 2019;18(3):435–49. doi: 10.33225/jbse/19.18.435

28. Kırkıç K, Arıkan E. Primary school teachers’ attitudes and views toward STEM education. Sci Educ Int. 2023;34(2):132–41. doi: 10.33828/sei.v34.i2.7

29. Boutry J, Tissot S, Mekaoui N, Dujon A, Meliani J, Hamede R, et al. Tumors alter life history traits in the freshwater cnidarian, Hydra oligactis. iScience. 2022;25(10):105034. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105034

30. Dai M, Wang T, Wang Y, Xu J. Effects of warming and phosphorus enrichment on the C:N:P stoichiometry of Potamogeton crispus organs. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:814255. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.814255

31. Idris R, Govindasamy P, Nachiappan S, Bacotang J. Exploring the impact of cognitive factors on learning, motivation and career in Malaysia’s STEM education. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2023;13(6). doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17227

32. Le L, Tran T, Trần N. Challenges to STEM education in Vietnamese high school contexts. Heliyon. 2021;7(12):e08649. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08649

33. Nawawi N, Dafrita I. STEM teaching materials integrated with Arduino science journal for biology prospective teachers. J Pendidikan Sains (JPS). 2022;10(1):36–44. doi: 10.26714/jps.10.1.2022.36-44

34. Idris R, Govindasamy P, Nachiappan S, Bacotang J. Exploring the impact of cognitive factors on learning, motivation and career in Malaysia’s STEM education. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2023;13(6). doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17227

Downloads

Published

2025-08-08

How to Cite

1.
A. Madale V, M. Lluisma K, Salic-Hairulla MA, R. Alcopra A, R. Magsayo J, O. Ellare A, et al. Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding through contextualized STEM approach: advancing science literacy in health and education. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 8 [cited 2025 Aug. 29];4:712. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/712