Implementing a Collaborative-Inquiry learning Model to Foster 21st Century Critical Thinking: A Validity and Practicality Study for Sustainable Human Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025724Keywords:
collaborative learning, inquiry learning, critical thinking, validity and practicality, sustainable developmentAbstract
Introduction: Critical thinking skills are core competencies of the 21st century for individuals to solve complex problems, make data-based decisions, and adapt to rapid social, technological, and environmental changes. This condition indicates the need for innovative learning models to encourage active student involvement and develop critical thinking in a meaningful collaborative context. This study aims to evaluate the validity and practicality of the Collaborative-Inquiry Learning (Collin) model in developing 21st century critical thinking skills, which contribute to sustainable human development in the era of digital transformation.
Method: The study was conducted in stages: preliminary study, prototype design, and formative evaluation. The products developed include model books, student’s book, and teacher’s book designed to support collaborative inquiry learning. Validation was carried out by education experts, colleagues, and practitioners, while the practicality test was obtained from teachers and students’ feedback.
Results: The validation results showed a very high level of validity with an average score: model book (0.85), teacher’s book (0.85), and student’s book (0.82). The practicality from teachers resulted in a score of 89.27 for teacher’s and student’s book. The practicality from students resulted a score of 94.82 for student’s book. All instruments were declared feasible and relevant to be applied in 21st century learning.
Conclusion: The Collaborative-Inquiry learning model is declared valid and practical to be applied in learning, especially in developing students’ critical thinking skills. This model supports active and reflective learning needed to form human resources that are adaptive, collaborative, and ready to face global challenges sustainably.
References
1. Naikoo AA, Thakur SS, Guroo TA, Lone AA. Development of society under the modern technology - A review. Sch Int J Bus Policy Gov [Internet]. 2018;5(1):1–8. Available from: 10.19085/journal.sijbpg050101
2. Vivitsou M. Digitalisation in education, allusions and references. Cent Educ Policy Stud J [Internet]. 2019;9(3):117–36. Available from: 10.26529/cepsj.706
3. Katyeudo KK, de Souza RAC. Digital transformation towards education 4.0. Informatics Educ [Internet]. 2022;21(2):283–309. Available from: 10.15388/infedu.2022.13
4. Pecson R, Sarmiento J. Integrating 21st-century skills into instructional materials for sustainable education. Indones J Instr Media Model [Internet]. 2024;6(2):89–99. Available from: 10.32585/ijimm.v6i2.5934
5. Ydyrysbayev D, Kakimova LS, Sailaubaikyzy BG, Talgatbekovich SY, Urmatova A, Orazbaev E. Determining the digital transformation in education in the society 5.0 process. Int J Emerg Technol Learn [Internet]. 2022;17(18):136–45. Available from: 10.3991/ijet.v17i18.32331
6. Bozkurt A, Sharma R. Digital transformation and the way we (mis)interpret technology. Asian J Distance Educ [Internet]. 2022;17(1):1–8. Available from: https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/630
7. Bond M, Marín VI, Dolch C, Bedenlier S, Zawacki-Richter O. Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. Int J Educ Technol High Educ [Internet]. 2018;15(1):1–20. Available from: 10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
8. Renyaan SA. Information and communication technology for inclusive education: A literature review and its implications for community services. J Community Dedication [Internet]. 2024;4(2):383–96. Available from: https://adisampublisher.org/index.php/pkm/article/view/708
9. Erlangga IS, Tarigan FPP, Ternasih L. Digital transformation in education: Challenges and opportunities in the modern era. Int J Teach Learn [Internet]. 2020;2(12):3251~3260. Available from: https://injotel.org/index.php/12/article/view/341
10. Amelia M, Prystiananta NC. Using inquiry based learning strategy in teaching writing descriptive text. Linguist English Educ Art J [Internet]. 2021;5(1):1–10. Available from: 10.31539/leea.v5i1.2648
11. Wale BD, Bishaw KS. Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific J Second Foreign Lang Educ [Internet]. 2020;5:1–14. Available from: 10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2
12. Sotiriou SA, Lazoudis A, Bogner FX. Inquiry-based learning and e-learning: How to serve high and low achievers. Smart Learn Environ [Internet]. 2020;7:1–15. Available from: 10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x
13. Courtney M, Costley J, Baldwin M, Lee K, Fanguy M. Individual versus collaborative note-taking: results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing. Internet High Educ [Internet]. 2022;55(July):1–14. Available from: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
14. Kitjaroonchai N. The effect of collaborative writing tasks on EFL university students’ writing performance. Hum Behav Dev Soc [Internet]. 2022;23(3):20–31. Available from: https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hbds/article/view/259659
15. Latifah U, Ulfa SM, Rachmawati I. The effectiveness of using collaborative writing strategy for writing ability of senior high school students. SELL J [Internet]. 2020;5(1):1–18. Available from: https://publikasi.stkippgri-bkl.ac.id/index.php/SL/article/view/315
16. Huda SAN, Suyanto S, Arifi A, Putranta H, Azizah ANM. Experiences of participants in teacher professional education on obtaining soft skills: A case study in Indonesia. Eur J Educ Res [Internet]. 2021;10(1):313–25. Available from: 10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.313
17. Munawar S, Chaudhary AH. Effect of cooperative learning on the writing skill at elementary level in the subject of English. Bull Educ Res [Internet]. 2019;41(3):35–44. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244646
18. Oratmangun R. Teacher’s roles as: Classroom manager and classroom instructor. Cerdika J Ilm Indones [Internet]. 2020;1(2):164–70. Available from: 10.59141/cerdika.v1i2.24
19. Hamid SM, Mannong ABM, Hidayat N, Insyirah L. The effect of inquiry-based learning on secondary student learning outcomes in writing ability. J Dev Res [Internet]. 2021;5(2):126–31. Available from: 10.28926/jdr.v5i2.179
20. Darling-Hammond L, Floo L, Cook-harvey C, Barron B, Osher D. Implication for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appl Dev Sci [Internet]. 2020;24(2):1–44. Available from: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
21. Exline J. Concept to classroom inquiry-based learning. In Accessed on September, 20, 2022, at 10 pm. Link:; 2004. Available from: http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/inquiry/credit.
22. Abbas MFF, Herdi H. Solving the students’ problems in writing argumentative essay through collaborative writing strategy. English Rev J English Educ [Internet]. 2018;7(1):105–14. Available from: 10.25134/erjee.v7i1.1499
23. Helda T, Atmazaki A, Gani E. The validity and practicality of discovery-group learning models to improve 21st century skills of high school students. rEFLections [Internet]. 2024;31(3):1408–33. Available from: 10.61508/refl.v31i3.277735
24. Hanafi H. Konsep penelitian R&D dalam bidang pendidikan. Saintifika Islam J Kaji Keislam. 2017;4(2):129–50.
25. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Fifth edition. California: SAGE Publication; 2018. 388 p.
26. Branch RM. Instructional design: the ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.; 2009.
27. Sugiyono S. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.; 2017.
28. Arikunto S. Manajemen penelitian. Edisi revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.; 2016.
29. Prasetiyo WH, Naidu NBM, Sari BI, Mustofa RH, Rahmawati N, Wijaya GPA, et al. Survey data of internet skills, internet attitudes, computer self-efficacy, and digital citizenship among students in Indonesia. Data Br [Internet]. 2021;39:1–20. Available from: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107569
30. Kamsker S, Monitzer S. Digital transformation and higher education: A survey on the digital competencies of learners to develop higher education teaching. Int J Bus Educ [Internet]. 2020;160(160):22–41. Available from: 10.30707/ijbe160.1.1648090946.696630
31. Saputra MD, Joyoatmojo S, Wardani DK, Sangka KB. Developing critical-thinking skills through the collaboration of jigsaw model with problem-based learning model. Int J Instr [Internet]. 2019;12(1):1077–94. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201249
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M. Fadhly Farhy Abbas, Yenni Rozimela, Hamzah Hamzah (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.