Postgraduate Students' Problem-Solving Behaviour through Research Skill Development (RSD) Framework in Research Methodology Course: Case Study in Indonesia and Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025732Keywords:
Problem-Solving Behaviour, Postgraduate Students, Research Skill Development, Thematic AnalysisAbstract
Problem-solving ability is a crucial skill for postgraduate students, playing a vital role in research success, particularly in designing, conducting, and evaluating research. However, many students encounter difficulties during the process, such as determining a viable research topic, selecting suitable methods, and accurately interpreting data. The problem-solving behaviors that students exhibit could potentially influence their level of research skills within the Research Skill Development (RSD) framework, which offers six key aspects for developing research skills. This study aimed to explore the relationship between graduate students' problem-solving behaviours and their research skills based on the RSD framework. The study involved eight students from two universities in Malaysia and Indonesia. Data were collected through problem-solving tests and semi-structured interviews. The RSD framework was used to assess the students' level of research skills, which included aspects such as planning, conducting, and evaluating research. Analysis was conducted to identify patterns of problem-solving behaviours associated with the level of RSD. The results showed that students with more sophisticated problem-solving behaviours achieved higher levels of research skills in the RSD framework. Recommendations are provided for the development of more effective programmes so that students can be better prepared to face challenges in the academic and professional world.
References
1. Greer B. Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learn Instr. 1997;7(4):293–307.
2. Kim YR, Moore TJ. Multiple Levels of Metacognition: Circumstances Interfering with Students’ Spontaneous Metacognitive Activities. J Educ Res Pract. 2019;9(1):158–78.
3. Novotná, Jarmila, Eisenmann P, Přibyl J, Ondrušová J, Břehovský J. Problem Solving in School Mathematics Based on. J Effic Responsib Educ Sci. 2012;7(1):1–6.
4. Gulacar O, Bowman CR, Feakes D. Observational investigation of student problem solving: The role and importance of habits. Sci Educ Int. 2013;24(2):344–60.
5. Schoenfeld AH. Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint). J Educ. 2016;196(2):1–38.
6. Harisman Y, Noto MS, Hidayat W. Experience Student Background and Their Behavior in Problem Solving. Infin J. 2020;9(1):59–68.
7. Harisman Y, Khairani K. Perilaku Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa pada Perkuliahan Kalkulus Secara Daring. JNPM (Jurnal Nas Pendidik Mat. 2021;5(2):277.
8. Harun L, Darhim D, Dahlan JA, Harisman Y, Sovia A, Bakar MT. Students’ gesture of naive, routine, and shopisticated behavior oriented on mathematical problem solving. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1157(4):0–7.
9. Harisman Y, Noto MS, Hidayat W. Investigation of Students’ Behavior in Mathematical Problem Solving. Infin J. 2021;10(2):235–58.
10. Mahanal S, Zubaidah S, Setiawan D, Maghfiroh H, Muhaimin FG. Empowering College Students’ Problem-Solving Skills through RICOSRE. Educ Sci. 2022;12(3).
11. Yearworth M, Edwards G, Davis J, Burger K, Terry A. Integrating problem solving and research methods teaching for systems practice in engineering. Procedia Comput Sci [Internet]. 2013;16(December):1072–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.113
12. Muir T, Beswick K, Williamson J. “I’am nor very goot at solving problems”: An exploration of students’ problem solving behaviours. 2008.
13. Nouri J, Larsson K, Saqr M. Identifying Factors for Master Thesis Completion and Non-completion Through Learning Analytics and Machine Learning [Internet]. Vol. 11722, Ec-Tel 2019. Springer International Publishing; 2019. 555–569 p. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7
14. Rauf FHA. Challenges of Thesis Work: Towards Minimizing the Non-Completion Rate in the Postgraduate Degree Program. Eur J Bus Manag www.iiste.org ISSN [Internet]. 2016;8(7). Available from: www.iiste.org
15. Valdez DJR, Dela Rosa J. The Completion of the Academic Requirements at the Graduate School and Its Relation to Thesis-Writing. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2021;11(6):762–8.
16. Pfeffer CA, Rogalin CL. Three Strategies for Teaching Research Methods: A Case Study. Teach Sociol. 2012;40(4):368–76.
17. Shahsavar Z, Kourepaz H. Postgraduate students’ difficulties in writing their theses literature review. Cogent Educ. 2020;7(1).
18. Noviarni. Mengatasi Ragam Kesulitan Mahasiswa dalam Merancang Perangkat Pembelajaran untuk Matematika Sekolah melalui Metode Tugas dan Latihan Terbimbing. Lemma [Internet]. 2016;2(2):115–28. Available from: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/144809-ID-none.pdf
19. Willison JW. Research skill development spanning higher education: Critiques, curricula and connections. J Univ Teach Learn Pract. 2018;15(4).
20. Willison J, Buisman-Pijlman F. PhD prepared: research skill development across the undergraduate years. Int J Res Dev. 2016;7(1):63–83.
21. Sarawi AS. Outcomes and uptake of explicit research skill development across degree programs [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/92390PERMISSIONShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
22. Wilmore M, Willison J. Graduates’ Attitudes to Research Skill Development in Undergraduate Media Education. Asia Pacific Media Educ. 2016;26(1):113–28.
23. Ain CT, Sabir F, Willison J. Research skills that men and women developed at university and then used in workplaces. Stud High Educ. 2019;44(12):2346–58.
24. Willison J, Zhu X, Xie B, Yu X, Chen J, Zhang D, et al. Graduates’ affective transfer of research skills and evidence based practice from university to employment in clinics. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):1–18.
25. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Defign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed M ethods Approaches. Research Defign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed M ethods Approaches. 2018. pg 418.
26. B K, D B. PROBING CHILDREN’S STRATEGIES IN MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING. 1994;19(5):1–23.
27. Mataniari R, Willison J, Hasibuan MHE, Sulistiyo U, Dewi F. Portraying students’ critical thinking skills through research skill development (RSD) framework: A case of a biology course in an Indonesian University. J Turkish Sci Educ. 2020;17(2):302–14.
28. Chang CY. Does problem solving = prior knowledge + reasoning skills in earth science? An exploratory study. Res Sci Educ. 2010;40(2):103–16.
29. Missingham D, Shah S, Sabir F. Student engineers optimising problem solving and research skills. J Univ Teach Learn Pract. 2018;15(4).
30. Willison J, O’Regan K. Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers. High Educ Res Dev. 2007;26(4):393–409.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yulyanti Harisman, Aqilul Asra, Suherman, Armiati, Mazlini Adnan, Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo, Hafizatunnisa, Pipin Sumarni, Hamdani Syaputra (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
