The Synergistic Effects of Education, Experience, and Institutional Support on Nursing Lecturer Competency: A Novel Framework for Modern Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025735Keywords:
Lecturer competency, educational qualifications, teaching experience, institutional context, Competency Ecosystem Framework, professional development, nursing education, quality assuranceAbstract
Introduction: Lecturer competency is pivotal to teaching quality amid rapid transformations in higher education. Traditional studies often focus on isolated factors like qualifications or experience, overlooking the interplay between individual, institutional, and global influences. This study addresses this gap by examining the multidimensional determinants of competency among nurse educators in Indonesia, providing insights critical for improving educational outcomes in diverse and resource-constrained settings.
Objectives: This research aims to (1) identify key factors influencing lecturer competency, (2) explore the interaction between education and experience, and (3) develop an integrative framework to guide policy and faculty development.
Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to survey 626 nurse educators across 32 institutions. Data were collected using the WHO-SEARO Regional Competency Assessment Tool, validated through expert review and pilot testing (Cronbach’s α = 0.85–0.87). The analysis integrated empirical data with insights from 48 peer-reviewed sources on faculty development and nursing education. ANOVA and mixed-effects modeling were employed to assess group differences, institutional variability, and interactions between qualifications and experience, while effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were calculated to determine practical significance.
Results: Advanced qualifications (d = 0.51) and teaching experience (d = 0.33) significantly predicted competency. Doctorate holders outperformed master’s graduates, with competency gains accelerating over time, indicating synergy between education and experience. Institutional variability was modest (Var = 0.526), suggesting individual factors are more influential.
Conclusion: The study proposes the Competency Ecosystem Framework, positioning lecturer competency as a dynamic interplay of education, experience, institutional support, and global trends. Recommendations include promoting doctoral education, retaining experienced lecturers, and implementing standardized quality assurance. These findings offer actionable strategies for policymakers. Future research should adopt longitudinal designs and examine cultural variations.
References
1. Sidhu NS, Allen KJ, Civil N, et al. Competency domains of educators in medical, nursing, and health sciences education: An integrative review. Medical Teacher. 2022;45:219-228. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2126758
2. Janković A, Stanojević-Gocić M. Professor’s new clothes: 21st-century teaching competences in higher education. Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Pristini. Published online 2023. doi:10.5937/zrffp53-45162
3. Budi A, Goh TS, Prawiyogi AG, Zebua S, Khanna G, Daeli OP. Implementing Technology to Develop Lecturer Competencies from a Human Resource Management Perspective. 2024 3rd International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT). Published online 2024:1-7. doi:10.1109/ICCIT62134.2024.10701193
4. Flores M. Learning to teach: knowledge, competences and support in initial teacher education and in the early years of teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2020;43:127-130. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1733828
5. Davies K, Fisher K, Dickson M, Thrush S, Heron R. Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. Ecology and Society. 2015;20. doi:10.5751/ES-07581-200237
6. Webb C, Hoeting J, Ames G, Pyne M, Poff L. A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecology letters. 2010;13 3:267-283. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01444.x
7. Maysami A, Elyasi G. Designing the framework of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem: A grounded theory approach in the context of Iran. Technology in Society. 2020;63:101372. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101372
8. Shankar S, Gowtham N, Surekha T. Faculty Competency Framework: Towards A Better Learning Profession. Procedia Computer Science. 2020;172:357-363. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.055
9. Herawati A. Professional Development Programs: Increasing Lecturers’ Competencies in Technology Enhanced Learning and Gaining Students’ Engagement. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. Published online 2023. doi:10.18178/ijlt.9.3.279-283
10. Soro S. Kompetensi Penelitian Dosen dalam Meningkatkan Publikasi Ilmiah Era Digital (Studi Kasus dalam Konteks Pendidikan Umum/Karakter). EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Published online 2024. doi:10.62775/edukasia.v5i1.840
11. Tamozhska I, Rud O, Medynskyi S, Polukhtovych T, Kuzemko N, Rudenko-Kraievska N. The Educational Paradigm as a Conceptual Model of Developing Competencies During Learning. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. Published online 2024. doi:10.18662/rrem/16.2/851
12. Stevani M, Tarigan K. A Paradigm Shift of English Lecturers to Support Education Technology in Online Learning. Tarbiyah Wa Ta’lim: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Published online 2022. doi:10.21093/twt.v9i2.4487
13. Bouncken R, Kraus S. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in an interconnected world: emergence, governance and digitalization. Review of Managerial Science. 2021;16:1-14. doi:10.1007/s11846-021-00444-1
14. Júnior IJDN, Síveres L. THE TRAINING OF LECTURERS IN THE ECOSYSTEMIC THINKING PERSPECTIVE. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH. Published online 2022. doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v10.i9.2022.4779
15. Koroleva D, Khavenson T, Tomasova D. Genesis and Predictive Ability of Ecosystem Approach in Education. Foresight and STI Governance. Published online 2023. doi:10.17323/2500-2597.2023.4.93.109
16. Pinto-Llorente A, Izquierdo-Álvarez V. Digital Learning Ecosystem to Enhance Formative Assessment in Second Language Acquisition in Higher Education. Sustainability. Published online 2024. doi:10.3390/su16114687
17. Phillips M, Ritala P. A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Published online 2019. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119739
18. Furst M, Gandré C, López-Alberca CR, Salvador-Carulla L. Healthcare ecosystems research in mental health: a scoping review of methods to describe the context of local care delivery. BMC Health Services Research. 2019;19. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4005-5
19. Liesa-Orús M, Blasco RL, Arce-Romeral L. Digital Competence in University Lecturers: A Meta-Analysis of Teaching Challenges. Education Sciences. Published online 2023. doi:10.3390/educsci13050508
20. Latip MSA, Newaz F, Ramasamy R. Students’ Perception of Lecturers’ Competency and the Effect on Institution Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Students’ Satisfaction. Asian Journal of University Education. Published online 2020. doi:10.24191/ajue.v16i2.9155
21. Haro AV, Noroozi O, Biemans H, Mulder M. First- and second-order scaffolding of argumentation competence and domain-specific knowledge acquisition: a systematic review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 2019;28:329-345. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2019.1612772
22. Long C, Gee NC. Regression Analysis on the Effect of Lecturers’ Competencies on Students’ Performance. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development. Published online 2018. doi:10.4018/IJTEPD.2018070102
23. Szucs L, Andrzejewski J, Robin L, Telljohann S, Barnes SP, Hunt P. The Health Education Teacher Instructional Competency Framework: A Conceptual Guide for Quality Instruction in School Health. The Journal of school health. 2021;91 10:774-787. doi:10.1111/josh.13076
24. Seidel T, Shavelson R. Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results. Review of Educational Research. 2007;77:454-499. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317
25. Alexander P, Judy J. The Interaction of Domain-Specific and Strategic Knowledge in Academic Performance. Review of Educational Research. 1988;58:375-404. doi:10.3102/00346543058004375
26. Ingersoll R, Merrill E, Stuckey D, Collins G, Harrison B. The Demographic Transformation of the Teaching Force in the United States. Education Sciences. Published online 2021. doi:10.3390/EDUCSCI11050234
27. Ehrich J, Woodcock S, West C. The effect of gender on teaching dispositions: A Rasch measurement approach. International Journal of Educational Research. 2020;99:101510. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101510
28. González OT. The Data on Gender Inequality in Philosophy: The Spanish Case. Hypatia. 2020;35:646-666. doi:10.1017/hyp.2020.39
29. Kogan L, Schoenfeld-Tacher R, Hellyer P. Student evaluations of teaching: perceptions of faculty based on gender, position, and rank. Teaching in Higher Education. 2010;15:623-636. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.491911
30. Conger D, Dickson L. Gender Imbalance in Higher Education: Insights for College Administrators and Researchers. Research in Higher Education. 2017;58:214-230. doi:10.1007/S11162-016-9421-3
31. Lee SW, Lee E. Teacher qualification matters: The association between cumulative teacher qualification and students’ educational attainment. International Journal of Educational Development. 2020;77:102218. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102218
32. Okbay A, Beauchamp J, Fontana M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature. 2016;533:539-542. doi:10.1038/nature17671
33. Marrs S, Quesada-Pallarés C, Nicolai K, Severson-Irby E, Martínez-Fernández J. Measuring Perceived Research Competence of Junior Researchers. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834843
34. Durette B, Fournier M, Lafon M. The core competencies of PhDs. Studies in Higher Education. 2016;41:1355-1370. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.968540
35. King T, Srivastav A, Williams J. What’s in an education? Implications of CEO education for bank performance. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2016;37:287-308. doi:10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2016.01.003
36. Mantai L, Marrone M. Identifying skills, qualifications, and attributes expected to do a PhD. Studies in Higher Education. 2022;47:2273-2286. doi:10.1080/03075079.2022.2061444
37. Pera B, Hajdukiewicz A, Hodak DF. Digital Competencies among Higher Education Professors and High-School Teachers: Does Teaching Experience matter? Business Systems Research Journal. 2022;13:72-95. doi:10.2478/bsrj-2022-0016
38. Thornhill-Miller B, Camarda A, Mercier M, et al. Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence. 2023;11. doi:10.3390/jintelligence11030054
39. Lauermann F, König J. Teachers’ professional competence and wellbeing: Understanding the links between general pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and burnout. Learning and Instruction. 2016;45:9-19. doi:10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2016.06.006
40. Alaways S. Professional Performance Experience Versus Pedagogical Knowledge in Teaching Technique Class as a Creative Process. Journal of Dance Education. 2020;20:214-223. doi:10.1080/15290824.2019.1607352
41. Gore J, Lloyd A, Smith M, Bowe J, Ellis H, Lubans D. Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2017;68:99-113. doi:10.1016/J.TATE.2017.08.007
42. Graham L, White S, Cologon K, Pianta R. Do teachers’ years of experience make a difference in the quality of teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education. Published online 2020. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103190
43. Kunter M, Klusmann U, Baumert J, Richter D, Voss T, Hachfeld A. Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013;105:805-820. doi:10.1037/A0032583
44. Vanblaere B, Devos G. Exploring the link between experienced teachers’ learning outcomes and individual and professional learning community characteristics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2016;27:205-227. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1064455
45. Boring A. Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics. 2017;145:27-41. doi:10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2016.11.006
46. Reilly D, Neumann D, Andrews G. Investigating Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey. Research in Science Education. 2019;49:25-50. doi:10.1007/S11165-017-9630-6
47. Simon E. Cultivating Professional Identity: The Vital Role of Practical Teaching Experience for Future Educators. Education Sciences. Published online 2024. doi:10.3390/educsci14050439
48. Pekkarinen V, Hirsto L. University Lecturers’ Experiences of and Reflections on the Development of Their Pedagogical Competency. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2017;61:735-753. doi:10.1080/00313831.2016.1188148
49. Yim S, Lim EY. English teacher competency: a study with different school levels and teaching experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2023;44:219-233. doi:10.1080/02188791.2023.2291986
Erlina Suci Astuti, Joko Sulistyono, Yupi Supartini, Eviana Sumarti Tambunan, Fitriana Kurniasari Solikhah
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Erlina Suci Astuti, Joko Sulistyono , Yupi Supartini, Moh Wildan, Eviana Sumarti Tambunan , Fitriana Kurniasari Solikhah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
