Effectiveness of English Literature Material (ELM) Module for Indonesian Students throught Meaningful Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025736

Keywords:

English literature, English teacher candidate, meaningful learning, new learning approach

Abstract

English literature played a vital role for non-native English speakers. It provided them with new experiences and insights, enhancing both their spoken and written global communication skills. These skills offered authentic experiences that helped the students to develop into English language teacher skills through meaningful learning in a controlled environment. But many universities in Indonesia still used classical ways. A new approach to learning English literature was urgent needed in the globalization era. So, this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the English literature material module for Indonesian students through meaningful learning to English teacher candidates. This was a quantitative paired research design. Fifteen students were involved in this study, involved in comparing two measurements, a pretest and a posttest taken from the same individual under different conditions. The results indicated that the module improved students’ English literary works in communicative ways through meaningful learning in the aspects of prior knowledge, critical analysis, and integration with related materials. In conclusion, the module quite effective to improve the students’ English literary works for students in higher education in Indonesia through meaningful learning. The study emphasized the importance of understanding students' knowledge before giving new materials, creating trigger questions, and the ability to associate materials with other new concepts. Therefore, it was recommended that the module integrated by meaningful learning could be applied for foreign language students to improve their communicative skills through English literary works, so it could be beneficial in self-efficacy, self-critical analysis, and self-integration.

References

1. Al Sabiri AR, Kaymakamoğlu SE. A Study on the Views of English Literature Teachers about How to Teach English Literature: Libyan Higher Education Context. Folklor/Edebiyat. 2019;97(1).

2. Syafiqa N, Nawi M, Asma’ N, Muhmad Nor A. the Challenges in the Teaching of English Literature: a Systematic Review. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy. 2023;6(1).

3. Hu Y, Fang C, He X, Wu J. Implementing and Assessing a Teaching Mode Based on Smart Education in English Literature Teaching. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies. 2024;19(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.336484

4. Calafato R. Literature in Language Education: Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs, Practices, Creativity, and Literary Competence. Pedagogies. 2024;19(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2022.2164500

5. Istiani I, Anam Z. Integrating Peace Education in Literature Class. Rainbow : Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies. 2021;10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v10i1.46147

6. Mohd Nawi NS, Muhmad Nor NAA. The Challenges in the Teaching of English Literature. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy. 2023;6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v6i1.2640

7. A.E. T, M.O. O. Literature Modules in the Use of English Curriculum for Nigerian Polytechnics: Problems and Prospects. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics. 2022;5(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52589/IJLLL-POOB4WTP

8. Mystakidis S. Deep Meaningful Learning. Encyclopedia. 2021 Sep 18;1(3):988–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1030075

9. Vallori AB. Meaningful Learning in Practice. Journal of Education and Human Development. 2014;3(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a18

10. Saldarriaga et. al. Schoolwork in Meaningful Student Learning. International journal of social sciences. 2024;7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/ijss.v7n1.2233

11. Mubarok H, Sofiana N, Kristina D, Rochsantiningsih D. Meaningful Learning Model: The Impact on Students’ Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2022;12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0027

12. Yoon B, Uliassi C. Meaningful Learning of Literary Elements by Incorporating Critical Literacies. Lit Research. 2018;67(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336918786939

13. Sailin SN, Mahmor NA. Promoting Meaningful Learning through Create-Share-Collaborate. Proceedings of The ICECRS. 2016 Oct 30;1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.502

14. Joseph D. Novak, Alberto J. Cañas. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them 1 [Internet]. Florida; 2008 Jan. Available from: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/

15. Zafarani-Moattar E, Kangavari MR, Rahmani AM. Neural Network Meaningful Learning Theory and its Application for Deep Text Clustering. IEEE Access. 2024;12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3375754

16. Fan KK, Xiao P wei, Su CH. The Effects of Learning Styles and Meaningful Learning on the Learning Achievement of Gamification Health Education Curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2015;11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1413a

17. Polman J, Hornstra L, Volman M. The Meaning of Meaningful Learning in Mathematics in Upper-Primary Education. Learn Environ Res. 2021;24(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09337-8

18. Ningrum E, Yani A, Nandi. Meaningful Learning and Use of Mind-Map in Geography Subject at Senior High School. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. 2021;56(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.1.21

19. Hodgson J. Experience into Words. Vol. 59, English in Education. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2025. p. 125–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2025.2487351

20. Irshad S, Maan MF, Batool H, Hanif A. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): An Evaluative Tool for Language Learning and Social Development in Early Childhood Education. Multicultural Education. 2021;7(6).

21. Shabani K, Khatib M, Ebadi S. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers’ Professional Development. English Language Teaching. 2010;3(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237

22. Ofori-Attah K. Early Childhood Education and Instructional Ecology: A Vygotskian Approach In Teaching Early Childhood Social Studies. Athens Journal of Education. 2021;8(2):139–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.8-2-2

23. Teng MF, Mizumoto A, Takeuchi O. Understanding Growth Mindset, Self-Regulated Vocabulary Learning, and Vocabulary Knowledge. System. 2024;122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103255

24. Pansera M, Fressoli M. Innovation without Growth: Frameworks for Understanding Technological Change in a Post-Growth Era. Organization. 2021;28(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420973631

25. Jeon J. A Study on Practical Direction and Strategy of a Growth-Oriented Mindset in Knowledge Information Age. The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence. 2022;44(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2022.7.44.7.75

26. Andrews D, van Lieshout E, Kaudal BB. How, Where, And When Do Students Experience Meaningful Learning? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 2023;31(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.31.03.003

27. Yoon B, Uliassi C. “Researcher-As-Instrument” in Qualitative Research: The Complexities of the Educational Researcher’s Identities. Qualitative Report. 2022;27(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5074

28. Mardiani, Baharuddin AF. Literature-Based EFL Instruction: Benefits for Language Skills Development, Learning Motivation, and Cultural Understanding. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching. 2023 Oct 1;26(2):796–811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6366

29. Santoso W, Hamied FA, Muslim AB. Investigating Indonesian University Students’ Attitudes Toward ELF-Informed Materials in Business English Contexts. Studies in English Language and Education. 2025;12(1):103–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.38286

30. Antonio J, Valadares CS. Concept Maps and the Meaningful Learning of Science Los mapas conceptuales y el aprendizaje significativo de la ciencia. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers JETT [Internet]. 2013;4(1):164–79. Available from: http://www.ugr.es/~jett/index.phphttp://www.ugr.es/~jett/index.php

31. Bryce TGK, Blown EJ. Ausubel’s Meaningful Learning Re-Visited. Current Psychology. 2024;43(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4

32. Kusmaryono I, Jupriyanto, Kusumaningsih W. Construction of Students’ Mathematical Knowledge in the Zone of Proximal Development and Zone of Potential Construction. European Journal of Educational Research. 2021 Jan 1;10(1):341–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.341

33. Fryer LK, Li C, Guo Z, Liang L, Zhong Y. Self-Efficacy’s Role within Learning a New Language during Formal Education: Systematic review, critical evaluation of past research and paths forward for research and practice. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching [Internet]. 2025 Jun 30;15(2):251–78. Available from: https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/48234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.48234

Downloads

Published

2025-08-27

How to Cite

1.
Manurung P, Rozimela Y, Atmazaki A. Effectiveness of English Literature Material (ELM) Module for Indonesian Students throught Meaningful Learning. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 27 [cited 2025 Dec. 29];4:736. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/736