Experimental Evaluation Of Cloud-Integrated Iot Training Modules For Advancing 21st-Century Skills In Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025802Keywords:
IoT, cloud-based learning, 21st-century skills, higher education, experimental researchAbstract
Introduction: The accelerating shift toward Industry 4.0 compels higher education to adopt innovative technologies that foster critical 21st-century competencies, including problem-solving, critical thinking, collaboration, and digital literacy. While the Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud-based platforms are widely implemented in industrial domains, their integration into educational training modules remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of cloud-integrated IoT training modules in enhancing university students’ 21st-century skills.
Method: A quasi-experimental research design with pre-test and post-test control groups was conducted involving 120 undergraduate engineering students from two institutions. The training modules were developed with web server and cloud platform integration to enable real-time data acquisition, remote monitoring, and interactive learning experiences simulating authentic engineering practices. Data were collected through standardized 21st-century competency assessments, system usage analytics, and structured student feedback questionnaires.
Results: Analysis using ANCOVA indicated a significant improvement in critical thinking (p < 0.01), problem-solving (p < 0.01), and collaboration skills (p < 0.05) in the experimental group compared to the control group. Qualitative feedback further revealed that students perceived the modules as engaging, relevant, and supportive of real-world skill development.
Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that cloud-integrated IoT training modules not only enhance essential 21st-century competencies but also provide scalable solutions for technology-driven curriculum innovation in higher education. This research enriches the literature on IoT-based learning environments and offers practical implications for educators seeking to integrate Industry 4.0 technologies into teaching and learning practices.
References
1. Abd Wahab, M. H., Hassan, R., Samsudin, K., & Aris, N. S. (2021). Cloud-based laboratory for the Internet of Things (IoT) education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1235–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10309-2
2. Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
3. Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2020). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1544232
4. Botta, A., De Donato, W., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2016). Integration of cloud computing and Internet of Things: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.021
5. Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), The Adaptive Web (pp. 3–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1
6. Chatterjee, S., Bhattacharjee, K. K., & Kar, A. K. (2023). Adoption of IoT-based smart learning in higher education: A developing country perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1801–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11011-7
7. Chen, C. H., & Huang, K. C. (2020). The effects of project-based learning with flipped classroom on elementary students’ computing skills. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636079
8. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
9. Elahi, T., Hoque, R., & Islam, R. (2020). IoT-based cloud laboratory for engineering education. International Journal of Online Engineering, 16(5), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i05.13359
10. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
12. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
13. Haryani, T., Kusumawardani, S. S., & Rahardjo, B. (2021). IoT-based cloud computing in education: A case study of remote laboratory. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 24(3), 1452–1461. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v24.i3
14. Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2021). Student engagement in online learning: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(2), 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020478
15. Johnson, M., & Brown, T. (2020). Enhancing 21st-century skills through IoT-enabled cloud learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20345
16. Kaur, A., Singh, R., & Mahajan, P. (2020). IoT and cloud computing in education: A review. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 17(2–3), 875–883. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.8790
17. Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Libraries Unlimited.
18. Li, F., & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
19. Lin, M., Chen, H., & Liu, K. (2021). A cloud-based IoT platform for smart learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(7), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i07.21207
20. Mekki, K., Bajic, E., Chaxel, F., & Meyer, F. (2019). A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment. ICT Express, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2017.12.005
21. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
22. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project
23. Papadakis, S. (2021). Advances in mobile learning educational research (AMLER): Mobile learning as an educational reform. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.01.001
24. Ray, P. P. (2018). A survey on Internet of Things architectures. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 30(3), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.10.003
25. Sharma, G., Singh, R., & Gill, P. (2022). IoT and cloud-enabled learning environments: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(4), 310–316. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1608
26. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
27. Smith, J., & Clark, T. (2021). Pedagogical strategies for IoT and cloud learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106939
28. Sun, Y., & Looi, C. K. (2020). Designing for 21st-century learning in a smart learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1558252
29. UNESCO. (2022). ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (Version 4). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
30. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). 21st century skills: Discussion paper. University of Twente.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
32. Wang, S., & Wang, H. (2019). Big data and IoT for education: Opportunities and challenges. Future Internet, 11(11), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11110243
33. Wei, X., Cheng, I., & Li, X. (2018). Virtual labs for IoT education: A case study. International Journal of Online Engineering, 14(5), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v14i05.8739
34. Weng, F., Yang, R. J., Ho, H. J., & Su, H. M. (2018). A TAM-based study of IoT applications in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.010
35. Xu, B., & Chen, N. S. (2016). The moderating effects of use contexts on the mobile learning adoption. Computers & Education, 102, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.004
36. Yadav, A., & Nagpal, R. (2022). Role of IoT in Industry 4.0 education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8237–8258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10920-x
37. Yang, X., Li, X., & Lu, T. (2020). Cloud-based IoT education platform with AI integration. Sensors, 20(17), 4905. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174905
38. Zhang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2021). IoT-enhanced collaborative learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 42–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977825
39. Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
40. Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M., & Li, F. (2020). “School’s out, but class’s on”: The largest online education in the world today. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1301.07.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andri Dermawan, Yasdinul Huda, Yeka Hendriyani, M. Giatman, Ifdil, Wiki Lofandri (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
