From Education to Transformation: Uncovering the Mechanisms of Strengthening Environmental Health Literacy through the Implementation of the Adiwiyata Program De la Educación a la Transformación: Revelando los Mecanismos de Fortalecimiento de la Alfabetización en Salud Ambiental a través de la Implementación del Programa Adiwiyata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025914Keywords:
Environmental Health Literacy, Environmental Education, School Community, Adiwiyata Program, Sustainability, SDG 3Abstract
Introducción:
Los estudios sobre alfabetización en salud ambiental han avanzado significativamente; sin embargo, su implementación en las escuelas sigue siendo meramente ceremonial, no pedagógica, lo que limita su impacto en la transformación del comportamiento en el entorno escolar. Este estudio busca identificar las iniciativas para fortalecer la alfabetización en salud ambiental dentro del Programa Adiwiyata en diversos niveles educativos de Sumatra Occidental, como parte de la transformación de la salud ambiental en las escuelas.
Métodos:
Este estudio empleó un diseño cualitativo. Los informantes incluyeron directores de escuela, docentes y estudiantes seleccionados mediante muestreo intencional. Se utilizó un Procedimiento Manual de Análisis de Datos (MDAP) para identificar temas y patrones relacionados con el desarrollo de la alfabetización en salud ambiental.
Resultados:
Los resultados de la investigación indican que el Programa Adiwiyata fomenta el aprendizaje contextual y aumenta la participación de la comunidad escolar en comportamientos saludables y respetuosos con el medio ambiente. Por ejemplo, las escuelas desarrollan materiales educativos que fomentan hábitos respetuosos con el medio ambiente entre los estudiantes, integrando temas ambientales en todas las asignaturas. El ODS 3, La alfabetización en salud ambiental se mejora mediante diversas actividades prácticas, como la gestión de residuos, iniciativas de escuelas verdes y actividades de servicio comunitario. La eficacia del programa se basa principalmente en el liderazgo visionario de la escuela y sus prácticas docentes innovadoras.
Conclusiones:
El éxito del Programa Adiwiyata depende en gran medida de la capacidad del profesorado para integrar los principios de la salud ambiental en prácticas pedagógicas sostenibles.
References
1.
Syaifulloh MT, Kodir A, Zubaidah S, Sumarmi S. Dynamics and sustainability of environmental conservation at Adiwiyata school in Malang. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2022;1066:012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1066/1/012015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1066/1/012015
2.
Zaliyanti AM, Azani MZ. Implementation of the Adiwiyata program by the principal to foster students’ morals towards the environment. JIE (J Islam Educ). 2024;9:359–83. https://doi.org/10.52615/jie.v9i1.391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52615/jie.v9i1.391
3.
Amrullah F, Nurcahyo H. Implementation of environmental-based schools in the Adiwiyata program: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020). Atlantis Press; 2021. p. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.003
4.
Purwanto AMDC, Faizah R. Creating the Adiwiyata school with waste and environmental management at SDN Nglumber II Kepohbaru, Bojonegoro. NST Proc. 2023. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2023.3321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2023.3321
5.
Zahrah S, Susanto TTD, Pratama MZ, Aisyah J, Kurniawan A. Improving the quality of education through environmentally based learning. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan. 2024;38:47–56. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.381.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.381.5
6.
Giharto T, Mariah S, Mundilarno M. Manajemen pendidikan lingkungan hidup di sekolah Adiwiyata Mandiri: studi kasus SMA Negeri 2 Banguntapan. Bull Educ Manag Innov. 2024;2:118–34. https://doi.org/10.56587/bemi.v2i2.100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56587/bemi.v2i2.100
7.
Istiq’faroh N, Wibowo AH, Lestari WM, Murni AW, Mahsunah E. Strengthening school literature movement in elementary school during the Covid-19 pandemic. Al-Ishlah J Pendidik. 2022;14:3903–14. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1132
8.
Anisa N, Ainayah A, Nafissah NA, Riyanto S, Endarsti D. Implementation of reduce, reuse, recycle (3R) movement to improve the students’ environmental literacy. Int J Educ Insight. 2023;4:25–34. https://doi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijei.v4i1.10298
Seminars in Medical Writing and Education. 2025; 4:914 10
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025914
ISSN: 3008-8127
org/10.12928/ijei.v4i1.10298
9.
Hermawan I, Suwono H, Paraniti AAI, Wimuttipanya J. Student’s environmental literacy: an educational program reflections for sustainable environment. JPBI (J Pendidik Biol Indones). 2022;8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i1.16889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i1.16889
10.
Saputra DT, Rahmawati LE, Markhamah M. The fostering of multimodal text literacy in elementary school learning. Lensa Kajian Kebahasaan Kesusastraan Dan Budaya. 2024;14:187–210. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.14.1.2024.187-210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.14.1.2024.187-210
11.
Wijayanti A, Hariri H, Karwan DH, Sowiyah S. Principal’s strategies in realizing Adiwiyata school: a literature review. Eduvest J Univ Stud. 2021;1:841–9. https://doi.org/10.36418/edv.v1i9.114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/edv.v1i9.114
12.
Purwati R, Salsabila A, Claresta FC, Suharjo IBP, Nurhamidah N, Azizah SF. Cultivating care and love for the environment through ecobrick making. JETTI. 2023;1:35–43. https://doi.org/10.61227/jetti.v1i1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61227/jetti.v1i1.2
13.
Rachim S, Gunawan H. Persepsi pengunjung pameran HCPSN terhadap konservasi alam dan strategi promosi konservasi di masa pandemi. J Pariwisata Terapan. 2022;6:1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpt.67391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpt.67391
14.
Santillán OS, Cedano KG. Energy literacy: a systematic review of the scientific literature. Energies (Basel). 2023;16:7235. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217235
15.
Bungin B, Irwanti M. Buku referensi: Qualitative data analysis manual data analysis procedur (MDAP). Jakarta: Kencana; 2022.
16.
Vella J. Member checking in qualitative research. MCAST; 2023. Available from: https://mcast.edu.mt/wp-content/uploads/Jonathan-Vella.pdf
17.
Chang TJ. Exploring the multilevel mediation effects of teacher collaboration on the correlation between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy: education level as a moderator. J Res Educ Sci. 2022;67(4):35–72. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0002
18.
Schubatzky T. Navigating the complexities of student understanding: exploring the coherency of students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect. Sci Educ. 2024;108(4):1134–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21867
19.
Klemm K. Apparent biogeographical trends in Alexandrium blooms for northern Europe: identifying links to climate change and effective adaptive actions. Harmful Algae. 2022;119:102335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2022.102335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2022.102335
20.
Gefter L. Assessing health behavior change and comparing remote, hybrid and in-person implementation of a school-based health promotion and coaching program for adolescents from low-income communities. Health Educ Res. 2024;39(4):297–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyae015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyae015
21.
Damayanti MR. Effectiveness of a school-based peer-led education program on high school students’ health behavior in a boarding school in Bali, Indonesia. Enferm Clin. 2020;30(Suppl):90–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.07.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.07.019
22.
Moulton JFG. Developing a critical understanding of environmental activism through active learning. PS Polit Sci Polit. 2024;57(4):578–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096524000143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096524000143
23.
Linvill CQ. Effectiveness of a Hyflex teaching pedagogy in environmental engineering education on student performance and course outcomes. ASEE Annu Conf Expos Proc. 2022. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138314562&origin=inward
24.
Li Y. Analysis of English classroom teaching behavior mode in environmental protection field based on deep learning. Int J Comput Intell Syst. 2024;17(1):1–?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00457-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00457-0
25.
UNITAR. Fostering participatory approaches in environmental sustainability education. United Nations Institute for Training and Research; 2017.
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025914
11 Frinaldi A, et al
ISSN: 3008-8127
26.
Authelet M. Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia. World Dev. 2021;145:105487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487
27.
Schaub S. The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers’ participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes: a systematic review. J Agric Econ. 2023;74(3):617–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12538
28.
Newig J, Jager NW, Challies E, Kochskämper E. Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Glob Environ Change. 2023;82:102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705
29.
Zhang M. The effect of public environmental participation on pollution governance in China: the mediating role of local governments’ environmental attention. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2024;104:107345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107345
30.
Lemos MC, Agrawal A. Environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2006;31:297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
31.
Middleton J. Global governance for improved human, animal, and planetary health: the essential role of schools and programs of public health. Public Health Rev. 2021;42:1604610. https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1604610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1604610
32.
Goertzen L. Co-designing formative assessment practices: a collaboration between elementary school teachers and researchers to conceptualize and implement formative assessment as a unified practice. Teach Teach Educ. 2023;134:104306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104306
33.
Moutaraji IE. Cross effect of exercise, gender and level of sport expertise on cognition: visual perception, information processing and motor response. Int J Hum Mov Sport Sci. 2021;9(3):412–20. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090304
34.
Bai H. A critical reflection on environmental education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Philos Educ. 2020;54:916–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12472
35.
Ferreira J-A, Keliher V, Blomfield J. Becoming a reflective environmental educator: students’ insights on the benefits of reflective practice. Reflect Pract. 2013;14:368–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.767233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.767233
36.
Halimah L, Nurul SF. Refleksi terhadap kewarganegaraan ekologis dan tanggung jawab warga negara melalui program ecovillage. J Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan. 2020;17:142–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i2.28465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i2.28465
37.
Turasih T, Koosbandiah H, Riandi R. Field trips (outdoor learning) untuk melatih berpikir kritis dan peduli lingkungan pada materi perubahan lingkungan: literature review. J Pendidik Matematika Dan Sains. 2024;12. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i1.70479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i1.70479
38.
Adzani IA, Azizah KN, Adiwinata NJ. Implementasi ekopedagogi dalam pembelajaran sekolah dasar: meningkatkan kesadaran lingkungan dan keterlibatan siswa. J Pendidik Bahasa Dan Budaya. 2023;3. https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v3i1.2730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v3i1.2730
39.
Holst J, Brock A, Grund J, Schlieszus A-K, Singer-Brodowski M. Whole-school sustainability at the core of quality education: wished for by principals but requiring collective and structural action. J Clean Prod. 2025;145897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145897
40.
Müller U, Hancock DR, Wang C, Stricker T, Cui T, Lambert M. School leadership, education for sustainable development (ESD), and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives of principals in China, Germany, and the USA. Educ Sci (Basel). 2022;12:853. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120853
41.
Awodiji OA, Uleanya C, Naicker SR. School leadership development for sustainability in the post-digital
Seminars in Medical Writing and Education. 2025; 4:914 12
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025914
ISSN: 3008-8127
era. SFU Educ Rev. 2023. Available from: https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/sfuer/article/view/6146
42.
Peng Y, Alias BS, Wan X. The impact of sustainable leadership on education quality: a systematic review. J Law Sustain Stud. 2024. Available from: https://ojs.journalsdg.org/jlss/article/view/3760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i6.3760
43.
Fitriana N, Zuraida L. The role of ecological and digital leadership in improving school performance. J Reg Econ Dev. 2025;2(4):1–20. Available from: http://eprint.stieww.ac.id/2783/14/Penelitian-Artikel.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/jred.v2i4.843
44.
Chen X. Research on the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and teaching innovation as a mediator. Int J Innov Res Sci Stud. 2023;6(2):381–8. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i2.1476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i2.1476
45.
Warr M, Mishra P. Integrating the discourse on teachers and design: an analysis of ten years of scholarship. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;99:103274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103274
46.
Togo M, Gandidzanwa CP. The role of Education 5.0 in accelerating the implementation of SDGs and challenges encountered at the University of Zimbabwe. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2021;22:1520–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2020-0158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2020-0158
47.
Santos GL. The history of the first Brazilian device for ongoing teacher training through information technology. Educ Pesqui. 2025;51:1–?. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202551282277por DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202551282277en
48.
Ya’cub M. Strategi kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran melalui pengembangan sarana prasarana. Munaddhomah. 2021;2(2):60–9. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v2i2.67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v2i2.67
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Prof. Aldri Frinaldi, S.H., M.Hum., Ph.D, Angga Putra Tri Rezeki, S.AP, Adil Mubarak, S.IP., M.Si, Dr. Nora Eka Putri, S.IP., M.Si, Boni Saputra, S.Ap., M.Si, Irvan Renaldi, S.AP., MPA (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
