The Dragon Fruit Advantage: Exploring University Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of a Targeted Nutrition Education Module

Authors

  • Adelfa Silor Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology Author
  • Faith Stephanny C. Silor Office of Research Management, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Enterprise, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3379-0990

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025924

Keywords:

Nutrition Literacy, Dragon Fruit, Dietary Behavior, University Students, Food Education, Functional Foods

Abstract

Introduction: nutrition literacy plays a vital role in shaping healthy dietary habits, particularly among university students who are developing lifelong food behaviors. Functional foods such as dragon fruit provide a culturally relevant entry point for improving students’ understanding of nutrition and promoting healthier eating patterns.
Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of a Dragon Fruit Nutrition Education Module in enhancing nutrition literacy and improving dietary behaviors among university students.
Method: a mixed-methods design was used with fifty students participating in a multimodal intervention that integrated classroom instruction, hands-on cooking workshops, and digital reinforcement through mHealth tools. Nutrition literacy—comprising functional, interactive, and critical components—was assessed pre- and post-intervention. Dietary behaviors were examined through changes in fruit intake, dragon fruit consumption, and reliance on take-out meals. Qualitative feedback was analyzed using thematic analysis to understand student experiences and contextual factors.
Results: the intervention led to notable improvements in overall nutrition literacy, reflected in enhanced comprehension of nutrition information, improved communication of healthy eating concepts, and stronger critical evaluation skills. Students also reported positive dietary behavior changes, including increased fruit consumption, more frequent inclusion of dragon fruit in meals, and reduced dependence on convenience foods. Qualitative findings highlighted increased awareness, high engagement through experiential learning, motivation to adopt healthier behaviors, effective technological reinforcement, and environmental facilitators and barriers.
Conclusion: the module effectively strengthened nutrition literacy and encouraged healthier eating habits among university students. Its experiential and technology-supported design demonstrates strong potential for integration into university-based nutrition education programs.

References

1.

Ko E, Jang E, Sim J, Jeong M, Park S. Development of a campus-based intervention program to strengthen food literacy among university students: a qualitative formative study. Korean J Community Nutr. 2023;28(6):495–508. doi:10.5720/kjcn.2023.28.6.495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2023.28.6.495

2.

Jeong M, Kim J, Han D, Jang E, Choi K, Park S. A pilot investigation of a combined food literacy and exercise program for college students: a one-group pre-post intervention study. Korean J Community Nutr. 2024;29(6):455–466. doi:10.5720/kjcn.2024.00248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2024.00248

3.

Silva P. Nutrition and food literacy: framing the challenges to promote healthy eating. Nutrients. 2023;15(22):4708. doi:10.3390/nu15224708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15224708

4.

Schaafsma HN, Vidgen H, Gallegos D. Understanding food literacy intervention effectiveness: student perspectives on an mHealth food literacy program. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.01.001.

5.

Manna A, Vidgen H, Gallegos D. Examining the effectiveness of food literacy interventions in improving food literacy behavior and healthy eating: a systematic scoping review. Syst Rev. 2024;13:221. doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02632-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02632-y

6.

Royer MF, et al. Serving up FLAN: a food literacy and nutrition intervention to improve food security among older adults. BMC Nutr. 2024;10. doi:10.1186/s40795-024-00909-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00909-y

7.

Guiné RPF, et al. Food knowledge for better nutrition and health: a study on university students. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(11):1597. doi:10.3390/healthcare11111597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111597

8.

Qi Q, Sun Q, Yang L, Cui Y, Du J, Liu H. High nutrition literacy linked with low frequency of take-out food consumption in Chinese college students. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:1132. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16078-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16078-9

9.

Alshahrani NZ, Bafaraj AG, Alamri HM. Exploring university students’ nutrition literacy in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey. Front Nutr. 2024;11:1425650. doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1425650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1425650

10.

Yildirim M, Demir-Başaran S. Evaluating the effectiveness of the Food Literacy Program designed for a sustainable future. Int J Mod Educ Stud. 2025;9(2):434–453. doi:10.51383/ijonmes.2025.419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2025.419

11.

Watras E. On cooking abilities, nutrition literacy, and fruit and vegetable consumption: effects of a cooking and nutrition education intervention for college students [master’s thesis]. University of Maine; 2024. Available from: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5151&context=etd

12.

Watras E, et al. College student perceptions of a pilot cooking and nutrition workshop (College Cooking Connection). J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.

13.

Shakibazadeh E, Omidvar N, Doustmohammadian A. School-based interventions for promoting food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) in children: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2020;9:87. doi:10.1186/s13643- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01339-0

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025924

11 C. Silor A, et al

ISSN: 3008-8127

020-01339-0.

14.

Omidvar N, Doustmohammadian A, Shakibazadeh E, Clark CCT, Kasaii MS, Hajigholam-Saryazdi M. Effects of school-based interventions on food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) in primary-school-age children: a systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2023;129(12):2102–2121. doi:10.1017/S0007114522002811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114522002811

15.

Saengrut B, Chintanawat R, Suwankruhasn N. Effects of collaborative learning-based food literacy program on healthy eating behavior and HbA1c among older adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Belitung Nurs J. 2024;10(5):498–508. doi:10.33546/bnj.3482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.3482

16.

Ko E, Jang E, Sim J, Jeong M, Park S. Evaluating the effectiveness of a food literacy pilot program for university students: using a mixed methods research approach. Nutr Res Pract. 2024;18(6):885–896. doi:10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.885

17.

Evaluation of the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Questionnaire for college students. BMC Public Health. 2023;23. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17062-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17062-z

18.

Forray AI, Gologan AG, Coman M, Cherecheş RM, Petreus D, Vizitiu S, Borzan CM. A pilot study to examine the effects of a school-based intervention for promoting food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) in Romanian school children. Acta Med Transilv. 2021;26(3):12–17. doi:10.2478/amtsb-2021-0041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amtsb-2021-0041

19.

Dewi NU, Khomsan A, Dwiriani CM, Riyadi H, Ekayanti I, Hartini DA, et al. The combination of nutrition education at school and home visits to improve adolescents’ nutritional literacy and diet quality in food-insecure households in post-disaster areas (De-Nulit study): study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023;35:101185. doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101185

20.

Li Q, Wang J. Effectiveness of nutrition literacy intervention on pregnancy weight and eating behavior: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):21858. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-07979-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07979-3

21.

Patel D, Prescott M, Ellison B. Exploring changes in perceived stress across food security status before and after a cooking and food skills intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025;57(8). doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.159

22.

Omori K. Food literacy among Japanese university students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025;57(8 Suppl):S56. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.120

23.

Schaafsma HN, Caruso OT, McEachern LW, Seabrook JA, Gilliland JA. Understanding food literacy intervention effectiveness: postsecondary students’ perspectives on how a mHealth food literacy intervention impacted their dietary behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.01.003

24.

Saengthong W, et al. Effects of a nutrition literacy promotion program on nutrition literacy and food consumption behavior. Princess Naradhiwas Univ J. 2023.

25.

Russell RD, Begley A, Daly A, Dunlop E, Pham MN, Grech LJ, Black LJ. Feasibility of a co-designed online nutrition education program for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024;90:105816. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2024.105816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2024.105816

26.

Meng Y, Koundinya V, Price N, Jessop D, Van Zeghbroeck J. Basic food and nutrition knowledge: assessing nutrition knowledge, behaviors, and cooking skills among high school culinary career and technical education students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025;57(8). doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.015

27.

Russell RD, Begley A, Daly A, Dunlop E, Pham MN, Grech LJ, Black LJ. Evaluating experiences in a digital nutrition education program: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2024;27(5):e70012. doi:10.1111/hex.70012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70012

28.

Duffy V, Avelino D, Lituma-Solis B, Chen X, Mofrad M, Zigmont D, et al. Multi-level intervention combining digital food and nutrition literacy education with policy, systems, and environmental changes to improve nutrition security. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025;57(8 Suppl):S88. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.186

29.

Anderson A, King J. International students’ knowledge and use of campus food security resources at a Midwest state university. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025;57(8 Suppl). doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.126

Seminars in Medical Writing and Education. 2025; 4:924 12

https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025924

ISSN: 3008-8127

30.

Katenga-Kaunda LZ, Iversen PO, Kamudoni PR, Holmboe-Ottesen G, Fjeld HE. Food-based nutrition counselling and education intervention for improved diets of pregnant women in rural Malawi: a qualitative study of factors influencing dietary behaviour change. Public Health Nutr. 2022;25(9):2436–2447. doi:10.1017/S1368980022000593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000593

31.

Chatterjee P, Nirgude A. A systematic review of school-based nutrition interventions for promoting healthy dietary practices and lifestyle among school children and adolescents. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e53127. doi:10.7759/cureus.53127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53127

32.

Osei AN, Djekic-Ivankovic M, Larson CP, Agbemafle I, Agbozo F. Effect of school-based nutrition interventions among primary school children in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068901

Downloads

Published

2025-12-14

How to Cite

1.
Silor A, C. Silor FS. The Dragon Fruit Advantage: Exploring University Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of a Targeted Nutrition Education Module. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 14 [cited 2025 Dec. 29];4:924. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/924